The CREATE strategy for intensive analysis of primary literature can be used effectively by newly trained faculty to produce multiple gains in diverse students

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 224-242

  Stevens, Leslie M ^a   Hoskins, Sally G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; SCIENCE; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FACULTY; HUMANS; SCIENCE; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84901833634     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0239     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. AdamsWK, Perkins KK, Podolefshy NS, DubsonM, Finkelstein ND, Wieman CE (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: the Colorado LearningAttitudes about Science Survey. Phys Rev ST Phys Ed Res 2, 010101.
2. AdamsWK, Wieman CE, Perkins KK (2008). Modifying and validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for use in chemistry. J Chem Educ 85, 1435.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC.
4. American Association of Physics Teachers (2013). The Role of Scientific Societies in STEM Faculty Workshops: Report of the May 2012 meeting. www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/upload/ STEM_REPORT-2.pdf (accessed 6 December 2013).
5. Andrews TM, Leonard MJ, Colgrove CA, Kalinowski ST (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 394-405.
6. Baxter Magolda MB (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Brownell SE, Tanner KD (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and. tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 339-346.
8. Cloud-Hansen K, Kuehner J, Tong L, Miller S, Handelsman J (2008). Money, sex, and drugs: a case study to teach the genetics of antibiotic resistance. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 302-309.
9. Coe R (2002). It's the Effect Size, stupid. What Effect Size is and why it is important. Presentation to British Educational Research Association, Annual Conference, held September 12-14, 2002, in Exeter, UK, www.psych.yorku.ca/mcnelles/documents/ESguide.pdf (accessed 23 September 2012).
10. D'Avanzo C (2013). Post Vision and Change: do we know how to change? CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 373-382.
11. DeHaan RL (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE Life Sci Educ 8, 172-181.
12. Dembo MH, SeliHP (2004). Students' resistance to change in learning strategies courses. J Dev Educ 27, 2-11.
13. Duncan D, Lubman A, Hoskins SG (2011). Introductory biology textbooks under-represent scientific process. J Microbiol Biol Educ 12, 143-151.
14. Ebert-May D, Derting T, Hodder J, Momsen J, Long T, Jardleza S (2011). What we say is not what we do: effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. BioScience 61, 550-558.
15. Emerson JD, Mosteller F (2000). Development programs for college faculty: preparing for the twenty-first century. In: EducationalMedia and TechnologyYearbook, vol. 25, ed. RMBranch andMAFitzgerald, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 25, 26-42.
16. FlandersN (1963). Intent, action, feedback: a preparation for teaching. J Teach Educ 3, 251-260.
17. Freeman S, O'Connor E, Parks JW, Cunningham M, Hurley D, Haak D, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 132-139.
18. Gasper BJ, Minchella DJ, WeaverGC, Csonka LN, GardnerSM (2012). Adapting to osmotic stress and the process of science. Science 335, 1590-1591.
19. Gottesman AJ, Hoskins SG (2013). CREATE cornerstone: Introduction to Scientific Thinking, a new course for stem-interested freshmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 159-172.
20. Gray KE, Adams WK, WiemanCE, PerkinsKK (2008). Students know what physicists believe but they don't agree: a study using the CLASS survey. Phys Rev ST Phys Ed Res 4, 020106.
21. Gregg C, Ales J, Pomaric S, Wischusen E, Siebenaller J (2013). Scientific teaching targeting faculty from diverse institutions. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 382-393.
22. Henderson C, Beach A, Finkelstein N (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate stem instructional practices: an analytic review of the literature. J Res Sci Teach 48, 952-984.
23. Henderson C, Dancy MH (2007). Barriers to the use of researchbased instructional strategies: the influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Phys Rev ST Phys Ed Res 3, 020102.
24. Henderson C, DancyMH (2011). Increasing the impact and diffusion ofSTEMeducation innovations. Awhite paper commissioned for the Characterizing the Impact and Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations forum, held February 7-8, 2011, in New Orleans, LA. www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=36304 (accessed 20 October 2013).
25. Henderson C, Finkelstein N, Beach A (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: an introduction to four core change strategies. J Coll Sci Teach 39, 18-25.
26. Hoskins SG, Kenyon KL (2014). Letter to the editor. J Microbiol Biol Educ. http://jmbe.asm.org/index.php/jmbe/article/view/ 725/html.
27. Hoskins SG, Lopatto D, Stevens LM (2011). The CREATE approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates' self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemological beliefs. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 368-378.
28. Hoskins SG, Stevens LM (2009). Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less ismore in teaching science. Adv Physiol Educ 33, 17-20.
29. Hoskins SG, Stevens LM, Nehm RH (2007). Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory. Genetics 176, 1381-1389.
30. House JD (1994). Student motivation and achievement in college chemistry. Int J Instr Media 21, 1-12.
31. House JD (1995). Student motivation, previous instructional experience, and prior achievement as predictors of performance in college mathematics. Int J Instr Media 22, 157-168.
32. Hurley MH (2009). CREATE Grant 2: Year 3. Unpublished final program evaluation report.
33. Knight JK, Wood WB (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol Educ 4, 298-310.
34. Lovelace M, Brickman P (2013). Best practices for measuring students' attitudes toward learning science. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 606-617.
35. Maher JM, Markey JC, Ebert-MayD (2013). The other half of the story: ES analysis in quantitative research. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 345-351.
36. Momsen JL, Long TM, Wyse SA, Ebert-May D (2010). Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 435-440.
37. National ResearchCouncil (NRC) (2003). BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. NRC (2009). A New Biology for the 21st Century, Washington DC: National Academies Press.
39. Oliver JS, Simpson RD (1998). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self-concept on achievement in science: a longitudinal study. Sci Educ 72, 143-155.
40. Perry W (1970). Forms of Intellectual Development in the College Years: A Scheme, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41. Pfund C et al. (2009). Professional development. Summer institute to improve university science teaching. Science 324, 470-471.
42. Pintrich PR (2004). Aconceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educ Psychol Rev 16, 385-407.
43. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Washington, DC.
44. Rybarczyk B (2011). Visual literacy in biology: a comparison of visual representations in textbooks and journal articles. J Coll Sci Teach 41, 106-114.
45. Scott G, Levritz L, MumfordM (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creat Res J 16, 361-388.
46. Segura-Totten M, Dalman NE (2013). The CREATE method does not result in greater gains in critical thinking than a more traditional method of analyzing the primary literature. J Microbiol Biol Educ 14, 166-175.
47. Seidel SB, Tanner KD (2013). "What if students revolt?" Considering student resistance: origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 586-595.
48. Semsar K, Knight JK, Birol G, Smith MK (2011). The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for use in biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 268-278.
49. Shi J, Power JM, Klymkowsky MW (2011). Revealing student thinking about experimental design and the roles of control experiments. Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn 5, 1-16.
50. SilverthornDU, Thorn PM, SvinickiMD (2006). It's difficult to change theway we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. Adv Physiol Educ 30, 204-214.
51. Singer SR, Nielsen NR, Schweingruber H (eds.) (2012). Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nap.edu/ catalog.php?record_id=13362 (accessed 19 July 2013).
52. Stanger-Hall KF (2012). Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 294-306.
53. Stein B, Haynes A, Redding M (2012). The Critical thinking Ability Test (CAT), Cookeville: Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning, Tennessee Tech University.
54. Trujillo C, Cooper MM, KlymkowskyMW (2012). Using graph-based assessments within Socratic tutorials to reveal and refine students' analytical thinking about molecular networks. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 40, 100-107.
55. Weiss IR, Ridgeway CJ, Bond SL (1998). Local Systemic Change through Teacher Enhancement: Year Three Cross-Site Report, Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.