Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 117-122

  Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza ^a   Carli, Rafael Imai ^a   Falcón Antenucci, Rosse Mary ^a   Verri, Fellippo Ramos ^a   Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ^a   Villa, Luiz Marcelo Ribeiro ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implant; Implant systems; Photoelasticity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BIREFRINGENCE; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BIREFRINGENCE; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; OPTICAL IMAGING; PHOTOGRAPHY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84901828893     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00138     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:99-119.
2. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:247-259.
3. Costa CES, Pelegrine AA, Lopes FM, Guimarães CPD, Sendyk CL, Sendyk WR. Avaliação comparativa fotoelástica de diferentes desenhos de implantes submetidos á carga de compressão. Rev Implant News. 2007;4:377-382.
4. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:585-598.
5. Steigenga JT, Al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003;12:306-317.
6. Zadeh HH, Daftary F. Implant design for the spectrum of esthetic and functional requirements. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2004;32: 1003-1010.
7. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements: a biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:394-405.
8. Sutter F, Weber HP, Sorenson J, Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: design and engineering. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13:409-431.
9. Balfour A, O'Brien GR. Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:36-43.
10. Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:75-78.
11. Engquist B, Åstrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:30-37.
12. Misch CE, Strong T. Scientific rationale for dental implant design. In: Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis, Mo: Elsevier; 1999:200-229.
13. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:565-574.
14. Abususse NH, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang H-L. The effect of thread pattern implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;21:129-136.
15. Barbier L, Schepers E. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:215-223.
16. Bumgardner JD, Boring JG, Cooper RC Jr, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a new dental implant design in canine models. Implant Dent. 2000;9:252-260.
17. Chou H-Y, Jagodnik JJ, Muftu S. Predictions of bone remodeling around dental implant Systems. J Biomech. 2008;41: 1365-1373.
18. French AA, Bowles CQ, Parham PL, Eick JD, Killoy WJ, Cobb CM. Comparison of peri-implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989;9:221-230.
19. Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:333-340.
20. Cehreli M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Implant design and interface force transfer: a photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:249-257.
21. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:523-530.
22. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago. Ill: Quintessence Publishing; 1987.
23. Da Silva EF, Pellizzer EP, Quinelli Mazaro JV, Garcia Júnior IR. Influence of the connector and implant design on the implanttooth- connected prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12: 254-262.
24. Akça K, Çehreli MC. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:391-399.
25. Schrotenber J, Tsao Y-P, Kinariwala V, Wang H-L. Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal bone stress levels: a finite element analysis. Periodontology. 2008;79:2166-2172.