Preliminary evaluation of a new dental implant design in canine models

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 252-260

  Bumgardner, Joel D ^a   Boring, J Gregg ^b   Cooper, Robert C ^b   Gao, Cheng ^b   Givaruangsawat, Surmal ^b   Gilbert, Jerome A ^a   Misch, Craig M ^c   Steflik, David E ^d  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ST FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Histology; Implant design; Root form implant

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL ALLOY; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; DENTURE; DISEASE MODEL; DOG; EDENTULOUSNESS; FOLLOW UP; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE RESORPTION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOGS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0034577012     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200009030-00011     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW, et al. Functional surface area: Thread-form parameter optimization for implant body design. Compend Contin Educ Dent Spec Iss. 1998;19:4-9.
2. Steflik DE, Koth DL, Robinson FG, et al. Prospective investigation of the single-crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: Ten year results. J Oral Implantol. 1995;21:8-18.
3. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontal. 1991;62:2-4.
4. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4, 641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of complete prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:142-146.
5. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, et al. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:129-134.
6. Buchs AU, Hahn J, Vassos DM. Interim clinical study report: A threaded hydroxyiapatite-coated implant: Five year post-restoration safety and efficacy. J Oral Implantol. 1995;21:266-274.
7. Garretto LP, Chen J, Parr JA, et al.Remodeling dynamics of bone supporting rigidly fixed titanium implants: A histomor-phometric comparison in four species including humans. Implant Dent. 1995;4: 235-243.
8. Warren-Bidez M, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: Basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:264-273.
9. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transfor-maton der Knochen. Berlin: A. Hir-schwald; 1892.
10. Hart RT, Davy DT. Theories of bone modeling and remodeling. In: Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989.
11. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 1975;8:393-405.
12. Barbier L, Schepers E. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:215-223.
13. Steflik DE, Lake FT, Sisk AL, et al.A comparative investigation in dogs: 2 year morphometric results of the dental implant-bone interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11:15-25.
14. Steflik DE, Noel C, McBrayer C, et al. Histological observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 1995;21:96-106.
15. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Yearbook Inc.; 1993:123-156.
16. Fritz ME, Lemons JE, Jeffcoat M, et al. Evaluation of consecutively placed unloaded root-form and plate-form implants in adult Macaca mulatta monkeys. J Periodontal. 1994;65:788-795.
17. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Yearbook Inc.; 1993:29-42.
18. 3. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39:77-85.
19. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxyiapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:60-607.
20. Block MS, Finger IM, Fontenot MG, et al. Loaded hydroxyiapatite-coated and grit blasted titanium implants in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4: 219-225
21. Burr DB, Mori S, Boyd RD, et al. Histomorphometric assessment of the mechanisms for rapid ingrowth of bone to HA/TCP coated implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:645-653.
22. Barbier L, Schepers E. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in a dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:215-223.
23. Hoshaw JJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:345-360.
24. Garetto LP, Chen J, Parr JA, et al. Remodeling dynamics of bone supporting rigidly fixed titanium implants: A histomorphometric comparison in four species including humans. Implant Dent 1995;4: 235-243.
25. Kohn DH, Ko CC, Holliser SJ. Localized stress analysis of dental implants using homogenization theory. ASME-BED Advanced in Bioengineering, Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers V22 Anaheim, CA; New York: ASME 1992:607-610.
26. Misch CE, Dietsh-Misch F, Hoar J, et al. A bone quality-based implant system: First year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Im-plantol. 1999;25:185-197.