Impact of navigated-control assistance on performance, workload and situation awareness of experienced surgeons performing a simulated mastoidectomy

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 187-195

  Luz, M ^a   Manzey, D ^a   Mueller, S ^b   Dietz, A ^c   Meixensberger, J ^c   Strauss, G ^d  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d Centre Management   (Germany)

Author keywords

Health care ergonomics; Human automation interaction; Image guided navigation; Navigated control

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; COST REDUCTION; ERGONOMICS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ADDITIONAL CONTROL; CONTROL FUNCTIONS; HEALTH CARE ERGONOMICS; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; IMAGE-GUIDED NAVIGATIONS; NAVIGATED CONTROL; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; SITUATION AWARENESS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; AWARENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASTOIDECTOMY; NAVIGATED CONTROL TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; SIMULATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKLOAD; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EAR SURGERY; MASTOID; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; SURGERY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AWARENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MALE; MASTOID; MIDDLE AGED; OTOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84901804416     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1527     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Koele W, Stammberger H, Lackner A, et al. Image guided surgery of paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base - five years' experience with the InstaTrak-System. Rhinology 2002; 40(1): 1-9.
2. Dixon BJ, Daly MJ, Chan H, et al. Augmented image guidance improves skull base navigation and reduces task workload in trainees: a preclinical trial. Laryngoscope 2011; 121(10): 2060-2064.
3. Dixon BJ, Chan H, Daly MJ, et al. The effect of augmented real-time image guidance on task workload during endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2(5): 405-410.
4. Strauss G, Koulechov K, Hofer M, et al. The navigation-controlled drill in temporal bone surgery: a feasibility study. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 434-441.
5. Trantakis C, Dengl M, Grunert R, et al. Evaluation of a navigated and power controlled milling system 'navigated control spine' for spinal surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2009; 4: 487-495.
6. Ferris T, Sarter N, Wickens CD. Cockpit automation: still struggling to catch up. In Human Factors in Aviation, Salas E, Allard T, Maurino D (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; 479-503.
7. Parasuraman R, Manzey D. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum Factors 2010; 52(3): 381-410.
8. Reijnders K, Coppes MH, van Hulzen ALJ, et al. Image-guided surgery: new technology for surgery of soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33(3): 390-398.
9. Casap N, Wexler A, Eliashar R. Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: comparison of two navigation systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66(7): 1467-1475.
10. Gong J, Mohr G, Vezina JL. Endoscopic pituitary surgery with and without image guidance: an experimental comparison. Surg Neurol 2007; 67(6): 572-578.
11. Alobid I, de Pablo J, Mullol J, et al. Increased cardiovascular and anxiety outcomes but not endocrine biomarkers of stress during performance of endoscopic sinus surgery: a pilot study among novice surgeons. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137(5): 487-492.
12. Dixon BJ, Daly MJ, Chan H, et al. Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention. Surg Endosc 2013; 27(2): 454-461.
13. Strauss G, Koulechov K, Roettger S, et al. Evaluation of a navigation system for ENT with surgical efficiency criteria. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(4): 564-572.
14. Manzey D, Röttger S, Bahner-Heyne JE, et al. Image-guided navigation: the surgeon's perspective on performance consequences and human factors issues. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2009; 5: 297-308.
15. Manzey D, Luz M, Mueller S, et al. Automation in surgery: the impact of navigated-control assistance on performance, workload, situation awareness, and acquisition of surgical skills. Hum Factors 2011; 53: 584-599.
16. Endsley M. Direct measurement of SA: Validity and use of SAGAT. In Situation Awareness: Analysis and Measurement, Endsley MR, Garland DJ (eds). Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2000; 147-173.
17. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of a multidimensional workload rating scale: results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human Mental Workload, Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988; 139-183.
18. Mulder G, Mulder LJM. Information processing and cardiovascular control. Psychophysiology 1981; 18(4): 392-402.
19. Metson RB, Cosenza MJ, Cunningham MJ, et al. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2000; 110(6): 972-976.
20. Strauss G, Schaller S, Zaminer B, et al. Clinical experiences with an automatic collision warning system. Instrument navigation in endoscopic transnasal surgery. HNO Praxis 2011; 59(5): 470-479.