Image-guided navigation: The surgeon's perspective on performance consequences and human factors issues

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 297-308

  Manzey, Dietrich ^a   Röttger, Stefan ^a   Bahner Heyne, J Elin ^a   Schulze Kissing, Dirk ^b   Dietz, Andreas ^c   Meixensberger, Jürgen ^c   Strauss, Gero ^c  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automation; Human factors; Image guided navigation; Surgical performance; User survey

Indexed keywords

NAVIGATION; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SURGERY;

BACKGROUND IMAGE; IMAGE-GUIDED NAVIGATIONS; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE; SAFETY-RELATED; SITUATION AWARENESS; SURGICAL PERFORMANCE; TIME PRESSURES; USER SURVEYS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGING; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; SURGEON; WORKLOAD;

EID: 70350714544     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.261     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ecke U, Luebben B, Maurer J, et al. Comparison of different computer-aided surgery systems in skull base surgery. Skull Base 2003; 13(1): 43-50. (Pubitemid 36322173)
2. Koele W, Stammberger H, Lackner A, et al. Image guided surgery of paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base - five years' experience with the InstaTrak-System. Rhinology 2002; 40(1): 1-9. (Pubitemid 34436225)
3. Caversaccio M, Nolte LP, Hausler R. Present state and future perspectives of computer aided surgery in the field of ENT and skull base. Acta Otorrinolaringol Belg 2002; 56(1): 51-60. (Pubitemid 34225513)
4. Olson G, Citardi MJ. Image-guided functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123(3): 188-194. (Pubitemid 30703690)
5. Manzey D, Strauss G, Trantakis C, et al. Automation in surgery: a systematic approach. Surg Technol Int (in press).
6. Parasuraman R, Riley V. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors 1997; 39(2): 230-253. (Pubitemid 27327641)
7. Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 2000; 30(3): 286-297. (Pubitemid 30883563)
8. Reijnders K, Coppes MH, van Hulzen ALJ, et al. Image-guided surgery: new technology for surgery of soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33(3): 390-398. (Pubitemid 46488668)
9. Casap N, Wexler A, Eliashar R. Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: comparison of two navigation systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66(7): 1467-1475. (Pubitemid 351822422)
10. Smith HE, Yuan PS, Sasso R, et al. An evaluation of image-guided technologies in the placement of percutaneous iliosacral screws. Spine 2006; 31(2): 234-238. (Pubitemid 43117715)
11. van de Kraats EB, Walsum T, Kendrick L, et al. Accuracy evaluation of direct navigation with an isocentric 3D rotational X-ray system. Med Image Anal 2006; 10(2): 113-124. (Pubitemid 43174968)
12. Gong J, Mohr G, Vézina JL. Endoscopic pituitary surgery with and without image guidance: an experimental comparison. Surg Neurol 2007; 67(6): 572-578. (Pubitemid 46738575)
13. Strauss G, Koulechov K, Röttger S, et al. Evaluation of a navigation system for ENT with surgical efficiency criteria. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(4): 564-572. (Pubitemid 44318066)
14. Manzey D, Strauss G, Trantakis C, et al. Automation in surgery: a systematic approach. Surg Technol Int (in press).
15. Sheridan TB, Parasuraman R. Human-automaton interaction. In Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, vol 1, Nickerson RS (ed.). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA, 2005; 89-129.
16. Morrow D, North R, Wickens CD. Reducing and mitigating human error in medicine. In Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, vol 1, Nickerson RS (ed.). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA, 2005; 254-296.
17. Vicente K. Less is (sometimes) more in cognitive engineering: the potential role of technology in improving patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 291-294. (Pubitemid 36981327)
18. Manzey D. Systemgestaltung und Automatisierung. In Human Factors: Psychologie der Sicherheit, Badke-Schaub P, Hofinger G, Lauche K (eds). Springer: Heidelberg, 2008; 307-324.
19. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995; 37(1): 32-64.
20. Röttger S, Bali K, Manzey D. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour, and workload in a simulated supervisory control task. Ergonomics (in press).
21. Wiener E. Human Factors of Advanced Technology ('Glass Cockpit') Transport Aircraft. 1989 NASA Ames Research Center Report: NASA Contractor Report 177528. NASA: Moffet Field, CA.
22. Metson RB, Cosenza MJ, Cunningham MJ, et al. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2000; 110(6): 972-976.
23. Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh IL. Performance consequences of automation induced 'complacency'. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3(1): 1-23.
24. Funk K, Lyall B, Wilson J, et al. Flight deck automation issues. Int J Aviat Psychol 1999; 9(2): 109-123.
25. Bahner JE, Hüper A-D, Manzey D. Misuse of automated decision aids: complacency, automation bias and the impact of training experiences. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2008; 66: 688-699.
26. Manzey D, Reichenbach J, Onnasch L. Performance-consequences of automated aids in supervisory control: the impact of function allocation. In 52nd Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, September 2008. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA, 2008; 297-301.
27. Skitka LJ, Mosier KL, Burdick M. Does automation bias decision-making. Int J Hum Comput Stud 1999; 51: 991-1006.
28. Lee JD, See KA. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 2004; 46(1): 50-80.
29. Lee JD, Moray N. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 1992; 35(10): 1243-1270.
30. Lee JD, Moray N. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 1994; 40(1): 153-184.
31. Parasuraman R, Byrne EA. Automation and human performance in aviation. In Principles and Practice of Aviation Psychology, Tsang PS, Vidulich MA (eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 2003; 311-357.
32. Sheridan TB. Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. Wiley: New York, 2002; 280.
33. Sindwani R, Bucholz RD. The next generation of navigational technology. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2005; 38(3): 551-562.
34. Hart SG. NASA task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA, 2007; 904-908.
35. Mosier KL, Skitka LJ. Human decision makers and automated decision aids: made for each other? In Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, Parasuraman R, Mouloua M (eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 1996; 201-220.
36. International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomics of human-system interaction, Part 110: dialogue principles. ISO 9241-10110 International Organization for Standardization: Genève, 2006.
37. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inf Sys Res 2000; 11: 342-365. (Pubitemid 33224535)
38. Heeren T, D'Agostino R. Robustness of the two independent samples t-test when applied to ordinal scaled data. Statist Med 1987; 6(1): 79-90. (Pubitemid 17017362)
39. Abdi H. The Bonferonni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, Salkind N (ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007; 103-107.