The navigation-controlled drill in temporal bone surgery: A feasibility study

Laryngoscope

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 434-441

  Strauss, Gero ^a,c   Koulechov, Kirill ^b   Hofer, Mathias ^a,c   Dittrich, Elmar ^c   Grunert, Ronny ^c   Moeckel, Hendrick ^c   Müller, Eva ^a,c   Korb, Werner ^c   Trantakis, Christos ^a,c   Schulz, Thomas ^a   Meixensberger, Juergen ^a,c   Dietz, Andreas ^a,c   Lueth, Tim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automation; Drill; Mastoidectomy; Navigated control; Navigation; Temporal bone surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRILL; EAR SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; FACIAL NERVE INJURY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MASTOIDECTOMY; MODEL; PETROUS BONE; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY; SKULL SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL RISK; TEMPORAL BONE; WORKPLACE;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MASTOID; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33947173899     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802c93a1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Müller A. Workflow-Analysis of 30 Procedures of Mastoidectomy. Leipzig: SHSG, 2003.
2. Green JD, Shelton C, Brackmann DE. Iatrogenic facial nerve injury during otologic surgery. Laryngoscope 1994;104:922-926.
3. Wormald PJ, Nilssen EL. Do the complications of mastoid surgery differ from those of the disease? Clin Otolaryngol 1997;22:355-357.
4. Olson JE, Dorwart RH, Brant WE. Use of high resolution thin section CT scanning of the petrosal bone in temporal bone anomalies. Laryngoscope 1982;92:1274-1278.
5. Seemann MD, Beltle J, Heuschmid M, et al. Image fusion of CT and MRI for the visualization of the auditory and vestibular system. Eur J Med Res 2005;10:47-55.
6. Gunkel AR, Vogele M, Martin A, et al. Computer-aided surgery in the petrousal bone. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1793-1799.
7. Plinkert PK, Plinkert B, Hiller A, Stallkamp J. Einsatz eines Roboters an der lateralen Schadelbasis. Evaluation einer robotergesteuerten mastoidectomy am anatomischen Praparat. HNO 2001;49:514-522.
8. Gourin CG, Terris DJ. Surgical robotics in otolaryngology: expanding the technology envelope. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12:204-208.
9. Lueth T, Bier J, Bier A, Hein A. Verfahren und Gerätesystem zum Materialabtrag oder zur Materialbearbeitung. DE patent 101 17 403 C2. 2001.
10. Klein M, Hein A, Lueth T, Bier J. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:712-718.
11. Strauss G, Koulechov K, Richter R, et al. Navigated control: ein neues Konzept fur die Computer-Assistierte-HNO-Chirurgie. Laryngorhinootologie 2005;84:567-576.
12. Grunert R, Thalheim M, Korb W. Simulationssystem für chirurgische Eingriffe In der Human-und Veterinärmedizin. Patent PCT/DE 2006/001966. 2006.
13. Strauss G, Hofer M, Korb W, et al. Genauigkeit und Prazision in der Bewertung von chirurgischen Navigations- und Assistenzsystemen. Eine Begriffsbestimmung. HNO 2006;54:78-84.
14. Moeckel H, Grunert R, Hofer M, et al. Anatomic and Functional Simulators for Surgical Education and Evaluation of Surgical Instrument. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2006;1(suppl 1):511-512.
15. Stanton NA, Pinto M. Behavioural compensation by drivers of a simulator when using a vision enhancement system. Ergonomics 2000;43:1359-1370.