PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: Rationale and design of the PROMISE trial

American Heart Journal

Volumn 167, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Douglas, Pamela S ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^b   Lee, Kerry L ^a   Mark, Daniel B ^a   Al Khalidi, Hussein R ^a   Anstrom, Kevin ^a   Dolor, Rowena J ^a   Kosinski, Andrzej ^a   Krucoff, Mitchell W ^a   Mudrick, Daniel W ^a,c   Patel, Manesh R ^a   Picard, Michael H ^b   Udelson, James E ^d   Velazquez, Eric J ^a   Cooper, Lawton ^e  

^a DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c McConnell Heart Health Center   (United States)

^d TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEATH; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); MULTIDETECTOR CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAM; STRESS NUCLEAR IMAGING; THORAX PAIN; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

AGED; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEART; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 84901747217     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A.S. Go, D. Mozaffarian, and V.L. Roger et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation 127 1 2013 e6 e245
2. H.P. Selker, R.J. Zalenski, and E.M. Antman et al. An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group Ann Emerg Med 29 1 1997 13 87 (Pubitemid 27030023)
3. S.D. Fihn, J.M. Gardin, and J. Abrams et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/ SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J Am Coll Cardiol 60 24 2012 e44 e164
4. Non-invasive cardiac imaging technologies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a summary of evidence-based analyses Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 10 7 2010 1 40
5. L.J. Shaw, T.H. Marwick, and W.A. Zoghbi et al. Why all the focus on cardiac imaging? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3 7 2010 789 794
6. K.E. Fleischmann, M.G. Hunink, and K.M. Kuntz et al. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance JAMA 280 10 1998 913 920 (Pubitemid 28423920)
7. Mowatt G, Vale L, Brazzelli M, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(30):iii-iv, 1-207.
8. D.W. Mudrick, P.A. Cowper, and B.R. Shah et al. Downstream procedures and outcomes after stress testing for chest pain without known coronary artery disease in the United States Am Heart J 163 3 2012 454 461
9. A. Rozanski, H. Gransar, and S.W. Hayes et al. Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009 J Am Coll Cardiol 61 10 2013 1054 1065
10. M.R. Patel, E.D. Peterson, and D. Dai et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography N Engl J Med 362 10 2010 886 895
11. J.K. Iglehart The new era of medical imaging - progress and pitfalls N Engl J Med 354 26 2006 2822 2828
12. L. Shaw, and J. Narula From adequate evidence to optimal evidence JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5 12 2012 1292 1293
13. M.J. Budoff, D. Dowe, and J.G. Jollis et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 1724 1732
14. W.B. Meijboom, M.F.L. Meijs, and J.D. Schuijf et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 2135 2144
15. J.M. Miller, C.E. Rochitte, and M. Dewey et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT N Engl J Med 359 22 2008 2324 2336
16. G.M. Schuetz, N.M. Zacharopoulou, and P. Schlattmann et al. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging Ann Intern Med 2010 167 177
17. M. Hadamitzky, R. Distler, and T. Meyer et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography in comparison with calcium scoring and clinical risk scores Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 16 23
18. F. Bamberg, W.H. Sommer, and V. Hoffmann et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the long-term predictive value of assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 2426 2436
19. E.A. Hulten, S. Carbonaro, and S.P. Petrillo et al. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 2011 1237 1247
20. J.B. Shreibati, L.C. Baker, and M.A. Hlatky Association of coronary CT angiography or stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among Medicare beneficiaries JAMA 306 19 2011 2128 2136
21. P.A. Tonino, B. De Bruyne, and N.H. Pijls et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 3 2009 213 224
22. M.S. Lauer CT angiography: first things first Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2 1 2009 1 3
23. P.S. Douglas, A. Taylor, and D. Bild et al. Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2 7 2009 897 907
24. M.A. Hlatky, P.S. Douglas, and N.L. Cook et al. Future directions for cardiovascular disease comparative effectiveness research: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute J Am Coll Cardiol 60 7 2012 569 580
25. K. Chalkidou, S. Tunis, and D. Whicher et al. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research Clin Trials 9 4 2012 436 446
26. G.A. Beller, R.O. Bonow, and V. Fuster ACCF 2008 Recommendations for Training in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine Core Cardiology Training (COCATS 3) (revision of the 2002 COCATS Training Statement) J Am Coll Cardiol 51 3 2008 335 338
27. P.A. Pellikka, S.F. Nagueh, and A.A. Elhendy et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20 9 2007 1021 1041 (Pubitemid 47321932)
28. K.J. Nichols, S.L. Bacharach, and S.R. Bergmann et al. Instrumentation quality assurance and performance J Nucl Cardiol 14 6 2007 e61 e76
29. G.L. Raff, A. Abidov, and S. Achenbach et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 2 2009 122 136
30. S. Abbara, A. Arbab-Zadeh, and T.Q. Callister et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 3 2009 190 204
31. A.S. Kosinski, and H.X. Barnhart A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present Stat Med 22 17 2003 2711 2721 (Pubitemid 37038352)
32. T.A. Alonzo, and M.S. Pepe Assessing accuracy of a continuous screening test in the presence of verification bias Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 54 1 2005 173 190 (Pubitemid 40166929)
33. D. Hedeker, and R.D. Gibbons A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis Biometrics 50 4 1994 933 944
34. G.S. Thomas, S. Voros, and J.A. McPherson et al. A blood-based gene expression test for obstructive coronary artery disease tested in symptomatic nondiabetic patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging the COMPASS study Circ Cardiovasc Genet 6 2 2013 154 162