An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1123-1130

  Sharma, Sanjay ^a   Balan, Srinivasan ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING NITIE   (India)

Author keywords

Multi criteria goal programming; Supplier selection; Taguchi's loss function; Technique for Order preference by similarity to ideal solution

Indexed keywords

GOAL PROGRAMMING; GOAL PROGRAMMING MODEL; MULTI-CRITERIA; QUALITY , DELIVERY; SUPPLIER SELECTION; TAGUCHI LOSS FUNCTIONS; TAGUCHI'S LOSS FUNCTION; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

TAGUCHI METHODS;

EID: 84888637609     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-012-0640-y     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Al-Faraj T. N.; Alidi A. S.; Al-Zayer J. A. (1993) Vendors selection via a spreadsheet analytical hierarchy process. Computers and Industrial Engineering 25(1-4): 65-68
2. Aouni B.; Kettani O. (2001) Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future. European Journal of Operational Research 133(2): 225-231
3. Athawale, V. M.; Chakraborty, S. (2010). A TOPSIS method based approach to Machine tool selection. In International conference on Industrial engineering and operations management, Dhaka.
4. Banker R. D, Charnes A.; Cooper W. W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science 30(9): 1078-1092
5. Chakraborty T.; Ghosh T.; Dan P. K. (2011) Application of analytical hierarchy process and heuristic algorithm in solving vendor selection problem. Business Intelligence Journal 4(1): 167-177
6. Chan F. T. S.; Kumar N.; Tiwari M. K.; Lau H. C. W.; Choy K. L. (2008) Global supplier selection: A fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research 46(14): 3825-3857
7. Chang C. T. (2007) Multi choice goal programming. Omega The international journal of management science 35(4): 389-396
8. Chang C. (2008) Revised multi choice goal programming. Applied mathematical modelling volume 32(12): 2587-2595
9. Charnes A.; Cooper W.; Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of the decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444
10. Charnes A.; Cooper W. W. (1961) Management models and industrial application of linear programming. Wiley, New York
11. Chen, Y.-S.; Cheng, C.-H.; Lai, C.-J. (2011). Extracting performance rules of suppliers in the manufacturing industry: An empirical study. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0530-8.
12. Dickson G. W. (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing 2(1): 5-17
13. Farrell M. J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, A 120(III): 253-290
14. Guan Z.; Jin Z.; Zou B. (2007) A multi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming model for the vendor selection problem under multi-product purchases. Information and Management sciences 18(3): 241-252
15. Ha S. H.; Krishnan R. (2008) A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 34(2): 1303-1311
16. Hwang C. L.; Yoon K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making method and applications. Springer, New York
17. Ignizio J. P. (1976) Goal programming and extensions. Lexington books, Lexington, MA
18. Kang, H.-Y.; Lee, A. H. I.; Yang, C.-Y. (2010). A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-010-0448-6.
19. Kasilingam R. G.; Lee C. P. (1996) Selection of vendors - a mixed integer programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 31(1/2): 347-350
20. Liao C. N.; Kao H.-P. (2010) Supplier selection model using Taguchi Loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi choice goal programming. Computers & Industrial Engineering 58(4): 571-577
21. Liao C. N. (2010) Supplier selection project using an integrated Delphi, AHP and Taguchi loss function. Probstat forum 3: 118-134
22. Liao C. N. (2009) Formulating the multi segment goal programming. Computers and Industrial Engineering 56(1): 138-141
23. Liu J.; Ding F. Y.; Lall V. (2000) Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5(3): 143-150
24. Lu, J.; Zhang, G.; Ruan, D.; Wu, F. (2007). Multi-objective group decision making: methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. ISBN-13 978-1-86094-793-3, ISBN-10 1-86094-793-X. Imperial College Press, London.
25. Ozaki, T.; Lo, M.-C.; Kinoshita, E.; Tzeng G.-H. (2011). Decision-making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0563-z.
26. Pang, B.; Bai, S. (2011). An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0551-3.
27. Pi W.; Low C. (2005) Supplier evaluation and selection using Taguchi loss functions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 26(1-2): 155-160
28. Ramanathan R. (2007) Supplier selection problem: Integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management - An International Journal 12(4): 258-261
29. Romero C. (2001) Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 29(1): 63-71
30. Ross P. J. (2005) Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. Tata McGraw Hill Edition, New Delhi
31. Saaty T. L. (2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. The Analytic hierarchy/network process. Statistics and Operations Research 102(2): 251-318
32. Saaty T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill edition, New York
33. Sharma S. (2010) Policies concerning decisions related to quality level. International Journal of Production Economics 125(1): 146-152
34. Sharma, S. (2012). Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2012.666866.
35. Sharma S.; Dubey D. (2010) Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: A case on carton sourcing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 51(9-12): 1171-1178
36. Taguchi G.; Elsayed A.; Hsiang C. T. (1989) Quality Engineering in production systems. Mc Graw Hill Book company, Tokyo
37. Talluri, S. (2000) Data envelopment analysis: Models and extensions. Decision Line, 8-11.
38. Tamiz M.; Jones D.; Romero C. (1998) Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state of the art. European Journal of Operational Research 111(3): 569-581
39. Tsai H. Y.; Huang B. H.; Wang A. S. (2008) Performance evaluation model of property-liability insurance companies in Taiwan-application of analysis network process. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 29(6): 1045-1065
40. Weber C. A. (1996) A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Management - An International Journal 1(1): 28-39