Still part of the conversation: Gender issues in science education

Second International Handbook of Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 499-512

  Scantlebury, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901695127     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_34     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (AAUW). (2004). Under the microscope: A decade of projects in the sciences. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2. Andersson, K., Hussenius, A., & Gustafsson, C. (2009). Gender theory as a tool for analyzing science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 336-343.
3. Baker, D. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 869-895). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bayne, G. (2008). Cogenerative dialogues: The creation of interstitial culture in the New York metropolis. In W. -M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America (pp. 513-528). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
5. Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971-1002.
6. Calabrese Barton, A. (2008). Feminisms and a world not yet: Science with and for social justice. In W. -M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America (pp. 409-426). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
7. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50-73.
8. Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 68-103.
9. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls' access, participation and resilience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392-414.
10. Cheung, D. (2009). Students' attitudes toward chemistry lessons: The interaction effect between grade level and gender. Research in Science Education, 9, 75-91.
11. Corbett, C., Hill, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: AAUW.
12. Deutsch, F. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21 (1), 106-127.
13. Garcia, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals:A research initiative of the campaign for educational equity. Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1. New York: Columbia, University, Teachers College.
14. Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-01). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
15. Hanson, S. (2009). Swimming against the tide: African American girls and science education. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.
17. Huang, S., & Fraser, B. (2009). Science teachers' perceptions of the school environment: Gender differences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 404-420.
18. Jovanovic, J., & Bhanot, R. (2008). Gender differences in science. In W. -M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America. (pp. 427-450). Rotterdam, the Netherlands:Sense Publishers.
19. Johnson, A. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805-821.
20. Kahle, J. B. (2004). Will girls be left behind? Gender differences and accountability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 961-969.
21. Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 542-576). Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association.
22. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (with Olson, J. F., Erberber, E., Preuschoff, C., & Galia, J.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA:Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
23. Martin, S., & Siry, C. (2011). Choosing the right tool for the job: An analysis of the utilization of video/multi-media resources in teacher education. In B. Fraser, C. McRobbie, & K. Tobin (Eds.), The second international handbook of science Education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
24. McRobbie, A. (2008). The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change. London:Sage Publication.
25. Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls and physics: Continuing barriers to 'belonging'. The Curriculum Journal, 17, 281-305.
26. Organization for Economic Coordination and Development (OECD). (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Retrieved June 30, from http://www. pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/50/42843625.pdf
27. Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Samarapungayan, A. (2009). Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 166-191.
28. Rahm, I. (2008). Urban youths' hybrid positioning in science practices at the margin: A look inside a school-museum-scientist partnership project and an after-school science program. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 97-121.
29. Scantlebury, K. (2007). Outsiders within: Urban African American girls' identity and science. In W. -M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Science, learning, and identity: sociocultural and culturalhistorical perspectives (pp. 121-134). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
30. Scantlebury, K., & Baker, D. (2007). Gender issues in science education research: Remembering where the difference lies. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 257-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Scantlebury, K., Baker, D., Sugi, A., Yoshida, A., & Uysal, S. (2007). Avoiding the issue of gender in Japanese science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 415-438.
32. Scantlebury, K., & Martin, S. (2010). How does she know? Re-visioning conceptual change from feminist perspectives. In W. -M Roth (Ed), Re/structuring science education: Reuniting sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 173-186). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
33. Tan, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2008). Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-inpractice:The stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 43-71.
34. Weisgram, E. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2007). Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls' attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 262-269.
35. Zapata, M., & Gallard, A. (2007). Female science teacher beliefs and attitudes: Implications in relation to gender and pedagogical practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 43-71.