Girls and physics: Continuing barriers to ‘belonging’

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 281-305

  Murphy, Patricia ^a   Whitelegg, Elizabeth ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gender; Influences and course choice; Interests, relevance and attitudes; Pedagogy; Physics; Physics self concept; Representations of physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149134179     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585170600909753     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. AAUW. 1998. Separated by sex: a critical look at single-sex education for girls, Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2. Aikenhead, G., 1994. “ What is STS science teaching? ”. In STS education: international perspectives on reform, Edited by: Solomon, J., and Aikenhead, G., New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Aikenhead, G., Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. paper presented at European Science Education Research Association. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
4. Angell, C., Guttersrud, O., Henriksen, E. K., and Isnes, A., 2004. Physics: frightful, but fun. Science and Education, 88 (5): 684–706.
5. Arnot, M., 1983. “ A cloud over co-education: an analysis of the forms of transmission of class and gender relations ”. In Gender, class and education, Edited by: Walker, S., and Barton, L., London: Falmer Press.
6. Bell, B., 2005. Pedagogies developed in the learning in science projects and related theses. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (2): 159–182.
7. Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., and Lubben, F., 2003. A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science–Technology–Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Research Evidence in Education Library
8. Boaler, J., 1994. When do girls prefer football to fashion? An analysis of female underachievement in relation to realistic mathematics contexts. British Educational Research Journal, 20 (5): 551–564.
9. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., and Brown, M. L., 2000. Students' experiences of ability grouping—disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26 (5): 631–648.
10. Breakwell, G. M, Vignoles, V. L., and Robertson, T., 2003. Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: the case of gender and science education. British Journal of Psychology, 94 (4): 437–455.
11. Browne, N., and Ross, C., 1991. “ Girls' stuff, boys' stuff: young children talking and playing ”. In Science and technology in the early years, Edited by: Browne, N., Buckingham: Open University Press.
12. Bruner, J., 1996. The culture of education, London: Harvard University Press.
13. Brutsaert, H., and Van Houtte, M., 2002. Girls' and boys' sense of belonging in single-sex versus co-educational schools. Research in Education, 68: 48–56.
14. Cheng, Y., Payne, J., and Witherspoon, S., 1995. England and Wales youth cohort study: science and mathematics in full-time education after 16, London: Institute of Policy Studies, Department for Education and Employment.
15. Clarricoates, K., ed. 1987. Dinosaurs in the classroom. Gender and the politics of schooling, London: Hutchinson.
16. Colley, A., Comber, C., and Hargreaves, D., 1994. School subject preferences of pupils in single-sex and co-educational secondary schools. Educational Studies, 20 (3): 379–385.
17. Davies, B., 2003. Shards of glass: children reading and writing beyond gendered identities, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
18. Dearing, S. R., 1996. Review of 16–19 qualifications, London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
19. Delamont, S., 1990. Sex roles and the school (), 2nd edn, London: Routledge.
20. Delamont, S., and Duffin, L., eds. 1978. Nineteenth-century woman, London: Croom Helm.
21. Elwood, J., and Comber, C., 1996. Gender differences in examinations at 18+, final report, London: Institute of Education.
22. Elwood, J., and Murphy, P., 2002. Tests, tiers and achievement: gender and performance at 16 and 14 in England. European Journal of Education, 37 (4): 395–416.
23. Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., and Maw, J., eds. 1998. Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement, Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., and Vincent, L., 1994. Candidates' performance in public examinations in mathematics and science, London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. CEM Centre Report, 30
25. Fox Keller, E., 1985. “ How gender matters or, why it's so hard to count past two ”. In Perspectives on gender and science, Edited by: Harding, J., London: Falmer Press.
26. Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Archer, L., and Melling, L., 2003. Subject choice and occupational aspirations among pupils at girls' schools. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11 (3): 425–442.
27. Francis, B., Hutchings, M., and Read, B., 2004. Science in girls' schools: factors that contribute to girls' engagement and attainment, London: Institute for Policy Studies.
28. Freeman, M. P., 2002. The influence of laboratory instruction on science achievement and attitude toward science across gender differences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8: 191–200.
29. Galton, M., ed. 1981. Differential treatment of boy and girl pupils during science lessons The missing half, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
30. Gillibrand, E., Robinson, P., Brawn, R., and Osborn, O., 1999. Girls' participation in physics in single-sex classes in mixed schools in relation to confidence and achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (4): 349–362.
31. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M. W., and Rennie, L., 2001. The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools, Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
32. Gorard, S., 2000. Education and social justice: the changing composition of schools and its implications, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
33. Hammersley, M., 2001. On ‘systematic’ reviews of research literatures: a ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27 (5): 543–554.
34. Hart, C., 1997. How the examination shapes the subject: the case of VCE physics, Adelaide: Australasian Science Education Research Association.
35. Hart, C., 2002. Framing curriculum discursively: theoretical perspectives on the experience of VCE physics. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (10): 1055–1077.
36. Havard, N., 1996. Student attitudes to studying A-level sciences. Public Understanding of Science, 5 (4): 321–330.
37. Hildebrand, G., 2001. “ Re/writing science from the margins ”. In Teaching science in diverse settings, Edited by: Barton, A. C., and Osborne, M. D., New York: Peter Lang.
38. Hildebrand, G., and Allard, A., Gender inclusive assessment practices. paper presented at International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement. Melbourne, Australia.
39. Hildebrand, G. M., 1996. “ Redefining achievement ”. In Equity in the classroom: towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys, Edited by: Murphy, P. F., and Gipps, C. V., London: Falmer Press.
40. Hodson, D., 1998. Teaching and learning science: towards a personalized approach, Buckingham: Open University Press.
41. Hoffmann, L., An intervention project promoting girls' and boys' interest in physics: opening the door to physics for girls. paper presented at ESERA Symposium: Gender Issues in Physics. Rome, Italy.
42. Hoffmann, L., 2002. Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12: 447–465.
43. Howe, C., 1997. Gender and classroom interaction, Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
44. Hughes, G., 2000. Salters' curriculum projects and gender inclusivity in science. School Science Review, 81 (296): 85–89.
45. Johnson, S., and Murphy, P., 1984. The underachievement of girls in physics: towards explanations. European Journal of Science Education, 6: 399–409.
46. Kahle, J. B., and Meece, J., 1994. “ Research on gender issues in the classroom ”. In Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, Edited by: Gabel, D. L., New York: Macmillan for the National Science Teachers Association.
47. Kelly, A., 1988. Gender differences in teacher–pupil interactions: a meta-analytic review. Research in Education, 39: 1–24.
48. Kenway, J., and Gough, A., 1998. Gender and science education in schools: a review ‘with attitude’. Studies in Science Education, 31: 1–30.
49. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., and Kelly, V., 1991. The assessment of performance in design and technology, London: Schools Examinations and Assessment Council.
50. Krogh, L. B., and Thomsen, P., 2005. Studying students' attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (3): 281–302.
51. Lips, H. M., 2004. The gender gap in possible selves: divergence of academic self-views among high school and university students. Sex Roles, 50 (5/6): 357–371.
52. Lyons, T., Choosing physical science courses: the importance of cultural and social capital in the enrolment decisions of high achieving students. paper presented at IOSTE XI Symposium: Science and Technology Education for a Diverse World: Dilemmas, Needs and Partnerships. Lublin, Poland.
53. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N., 1974. The psychology of sex differences, Paulo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
54. MacDonald, A., Saunders, L., and Benefield, P., 1999. Boys' achievement, progress, motivation and participation: issues raised by the recent literature, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
55. Manthorpe, C., 1985. “ The value of an historical perspective on girls and science and technology: the English experience ”. In Contributions to the Third GASAT conference, London: Chelsea College, University of London.
56. Matyas, M. L., 1985. “ Factors affecting female achievement and interest in science and scientific careers ”. In Women in science, Edited by: Kahle, J., London: Falmer Press.
57. McGinn, M. K., and Roth, W. -M., 1999. Preparing students for competent scientific practice: implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28 (3): 14–24.
58. Murphy, C., and Beggs, J., 2003. Children's perceptions of school science. School Science Review, 84 (308): 109–116.
59. Murphy, P., 1997. “ Gender differences: messages for science education ”. In Growing up with science: developing early understanding of science, Edited by: Härnqvist, K., and Burgen, A., London: Jessica Kingsley.
60. Murphy, P., 2000a. “ Are gender differences in achievement avoidable? ”. In Issues in science teaching, Edited by: Sears, J., and Sorensen, P., London: RoutledgeFalmer.
61. Murphy, P., 2000b. “ Gender identities and the process of negotiation in social interaction ”. In Rethinking collaborative learning, Edited by: Joiner, R., Littleton, K., Faulkner, D., and Miell, D., London: Free Association Books.
62. Murphy, P., 2000c. “ Equity, assessment and gender ”. In Gender, policy and educational change: shifting agendas in the UK and Europe, Edited by: Salisbury, J., and Riddell, S., London/New York: Routledge.
63. Murphy, P., and Elwood, J., 1998. Gendered experiences, choices and achievement—exploring the links. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2 (2): 95–118.
64. Murphy, P., and Whitelegg, E., 2006. Girls in the physics classroom: a review of the research into the participation of girls in physics, London: Institute of Physics.
65. Murphy, P., Ponchaud, B., Whitelegg, E. L., and Hollins, M., Girls in the physics classroom: a guide for teachers, London: Institute of Physics. forthcoming
66. Osborne, J., and Collins, S., 2000. Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum, London: Wellcome Trust.
67. Osborne, J., and Collins, S., 2001. Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (5): 441–467.
68. Parker, L. H., and Rennie, L. J., 2002. Teachers' implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (9): 881–897.
69. Pell, T., and Jarvis, T., 2001. Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23: 847–862.
70. Piburn, M. D., and Baker, D. R., 1993. If I were the teacher…qualitative study of attitudes towards science. Science Education, 77 (4): 393–406.
71. Purvis, J., 1981. “ The double burden of class and gender in the schooling of working-class girls in nineteenth-century England 1800–1870 ”. In Schools, teachers and teaching, Edited by: Barton, L., and Walker, S., Barcombe: Falmer Press.
72. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 1998. Can do better: raising boys' achievement in English, London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
73. Qualter, A., 1993. I would like to know more about that: a study of the interest shown by girls and boys in scientific topics. International Journal of Science Education, 15 (3): 307–317.
74. Reid, N., and Skryabina, E. A., 2002. Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20 (1): 67–80.
75. Ruddock, G., Sturman, L., Schagen, I., Styles, B., Gnaldi, M., and Vappula, H., 2003. Where England stands in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003, Summary of national report for England, London: Department for Education and Skills. National Foundation for Educational Research Report, 12
76. Sharp, C., Hutchison, D., Davis, C., and Keys, W., 1996. The take-up of advanced mathematics and science courses—summary report, London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. National Foundation for Educational Research Report, 19
77. Sharp, G., A longitudinal study investigating pupil attitudes towards their science learning experiences from a gender perspective, The Open University, Milton Keynes 2004, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis
78. Smail, B., 1984. “ Girl-friendly science: avoiding sex bias in the curriculum ”. In Schools Council Programme 3, York: Longman Resource Unit.
79. Spall, K., Stannisstreet, M., Dickson, D., and Boyes, E., 2004. Development of school students' constructions of biology and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (7): 787–803.
80. Spear, M., 1987. “ The biasing influence of pupil sex in a science marking exercise ”. In Science for girls?, Edited by: Kelly, A., Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
81. Spender, D., 1982. Invisible women: the schooling scandal, London: Chameleon Books.
82. Spielhofer, T., O'Donnell, L., Benton, T., Schagen, S., and Schagen, I., 2002. The impact of school size and single-sex education on performance, London: NFER.
83. Stables, A., 1990. Differences between pupils from mixed and single-sex schools in their enjoyment of school subjects and in their attitudes to science and to school. Educational Review, 42 (3): 221–230.
84. Stanworth, M., 1987. Girls on the margins: a study of gender divisions in the classroom, London: Unwin Hyman.
85. Stewart, M., 1998. Gender issues in physics education. Educational Research, 40 (3): 283–293.
86. Stobart, G., White, J., Elwood, J., Hayden, M., and Mason, K., 1992. Differential performance at 16+: English and mathematics, London: Schools Examination and Assessment Council.
87. Tobin, K., 1988. Differential engagement of males and females in high school science. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (3): 239–252.
88. Wajcman, J., 1991. Feminism confronts technology, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
89. Warrington, M., and Younger, M., 2000. The other side of the gender gap. Gender and Education, 12 (4): 493–508.
90. Warrior, J., 2003. Singularly successful. Report on teaching science and technology in single-sex classes in a co-educational school, London: WISE.
91. Whitelegg, E., 1996. The supported learning in physics project. Physics Education, 31 (5): 291–296.
92. Whitelegg, E., and Edwards, C., 2001. “ Beyond the laboratory: learning physics in real life contexts ”. In Research in science education: past, present and future, Edited by: Duit, R., Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
93. Wilder, G. Z., and Powell, K., 1989. Sex differences in test performance: a survey of the literature, New York: College Board Report, College Entrance Examination Board.
94. Wilkinson, J., 1999. Teachers' perceptions of the contextual approach to teaching VCE physics. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 45: 58–65.
95. Woolnough, B. E., 1994. Why students choose physics, or reject it. Physics Education, 29: 368–374.