Critical evaluation of stents in the peripheral arterial disease of the superficial femoral artery - Focus on the paclitaxel eluting stent

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 149-156

  Litsky, Jason ^a   Chanda, Arijit ^b   Stilp, Erik ^a   Lansky, Alexandra ^a   Mena, Carlos ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Atherosclerotic disease; Self expanding stent; Superficial femoral artery; Zilver PTX

Indexed keywords

DISEASE CONTROL;

BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY; CRITICAL EVALUATION; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; SELF-EXPANDING NITINOL STENTS; SELF-EXPANDING STENT; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERIES; ZILVER PTX;

STENTS;

EVEROLIMUS; PACLITAXEL; POLITEF; RAPAMYCIN;

ANTIPROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY; BARE METAL STENT; CLAUDICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COVERED STENT; CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMORAL ARTERY STENT; HUMAN; LEG REVASCULARIZATION; MATERIAL COATING; NITINOL STENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SELF EXPANDING STENT; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 84901664086     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S45472     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:1329-1340.
2. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2011 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:e18-e209.
3. Pande RL, Perlstein TS, Beckman JA, Creager MA. Secondary prevention and mortality in peripheral artery disease: National Health and Nutrition Examination Study, 1999 to 2004. Circulation. 2011;124:17-23.
4. Smith GD, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Intermittent claudication, heart disease risk factors, and mortality. The Whitehall Study. Circulation. 1990;82:1925-1931.
5. Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, et al, and the Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:197-208.
6. Stoffers HE, Rinkens PE, Kester AD, Kaiser V, Knottnerus JA. The prevalence of asymptomatic and unrecognized peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:282-290.
7. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286:1317-1324.
8. McDermott MM, Fried L, Simonsick E, Ling S, Guralnik JM. Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease is independently associated with impaired lower extremity functioning: the women's health and aging study. Circulation. 2000;101:1007-1012.
9. White C. Clinical practice. Intermittent claudication. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1241-1250.
10. Dotter CT, Judkins MP. Transluminal treatment of atherosclerotic obstructions: description of a new technique and preliminary report of its applications. Circulation. 1964;30:654-670.
11. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45 Suppl S:S5-S67.
12. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1879-1888.
13. Dick P, Wallner H, Sabeti S, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74:1090-1095.
14. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, et al. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:267-276.
15. Schienert D, Schienert S, Sax J, et al. Prevalence and clinical impact of stent fractures after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(2):312-315.
16. Cheng CP, Wilson NM, Hallett RL, Herfkens RJ, Taylor CA. In vivo MR angiographic quantification of axial and twisting deformations of the superficial femoral artery resulting from maximum hip and knee flexion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(6):979-987.
17. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al. Balloon angioplasty and stent implantation induce a vascular inflammatory reaction. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9(1):59-66.
18. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al. Inflammatory response to stent implantation: differences in femoropopliteal, iliac, and carotid arteries. Radiology. 2002;224(2):529-535.
19. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:S1-S296.
20. Capek P, Maclean GK, Berkowitz HD. Femoropopliteal angioplasty: factors influencing long-term success. Circulation. 1991;83(Suppl 2): I70-I80.
21. Cejna M, Turnher S, Illiasch H, et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:23-31.
22. Vroegindeweij D, Vos LD, Tielbeek AV, Buth J, vd Bosch HC. Balloon angioplasty combined with primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in femoropopliteal obstructions: a comparative randomized study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997;20:420-425.
23. Grimm J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Jahnke T, Hilbert C, Brossmann J, Heller M. Randomized study to compare PTA alone versus Palmaz stent placement for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12: 935-942.
24. Zdanowski Z, Albrechtsson U, Lundin A, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting for femoropopliteal occlusions? A randomized controlled study. Int Angiol. 1999;18:251-255.
25. Becquemin JP, Favre JP, Marzelle J, Nemoz C, Corsin C, Leizorovicz A. Systematic versus selective stent placement after superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:487-494.
26. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation. 2007;115:2745-2749.
27. Krankenberg H, Schlüter M, Steinkamp HJ, et al. Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length: the femoral artery stenting trial (FAST). Circulation. 2007;116:285-292.
28. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, et al. Nitinol stent implantation vs balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries of patients with claudication: three-year follow-up from the RESILIENT randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19: 1-9.
29. Chalmers N, Walker PT, Belli AM, et al. Randomized trial of the SMART stent versus balloon angioplasty in long superficial femoral artery lesions: the SUPER study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(2):353-361.
30. Bosiers M, Torsello G, Gissler HM, et al. Nitinol stent implantation in long superficial femoral artery lesions: 12-month results of the DURABILITY I study. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:261-269.
31. Matsumara JS, Yamonouchi D, Goldstein JA, et al. The United States study for evaluating endovascular treatments of lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal by using the Protégé Everflex nitinol stent system II (DURABILITY II). J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1): 73-83.
32. Laird JR. Update on the Complete SE trial. Paper presented at: International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy; January 18, 2012; Miami, FL.
33. Gray W. SMART Vascular Stent Systems in the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease trial 2 year data. Paper presented at: International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy; January 21, 2013; Miami, FL.
34. Scheinert D, Grummt L, Piorkowski M, et al. A novel self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent for complex femoropopliteal lesions: 24-month results of the SUPERA SFA registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18(6): 745-752.
35. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Callert J, et al. Results of the Protégé EverFlex 200-mm-long nitinol stent (ev3) in TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1042-1050.
36. McQuade K, Gable D, Pearl G, Theune B, Black S. Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:584-590.
37. Geraghty PJ, Mewissen MW, Jaff MR, Ansel GM; VIBRANT Investigators. Three-year results of the VIBRANT trial of VIABAHN endoprosthesis versus bare nitinol stent implantation for complex superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(2): 386-395.
38. Lammer J, Zeller T, Hausegger KA, et al. Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(15):1320-1327.
39. Duda SH, Pusich B, Richter G, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: six month results. Circulation. 2002;106(12):1505-1509.
40. Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare metal nitiniol stent for obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: the SIROCCO II trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(3):331-338.
41. Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, et al. Drug-eluting and bare metal nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13(6):701-710.
42. Carter AJ, Brodeur A, Collingwood R, et al. Experimental efficacy of an everolimus eluting cobalt chromium stent. Cath Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:97-103.
43. Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stentand a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patient with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1903-1913.
44. Lammer J, Bosiers M, Zeller T, et al. First clinical trial of nitinol self-expanding everolimus-eluting stent implantation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:394-401.
45. Axel DI, Kunert W, Göggelmann C, et al. Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery. Circulation. 1997;96:636-645.
46. Pires NM, Eefting D, de Vries MR, Quax PH, Jukema JW. Sirolimus and paclitaxel provoke different vascular pathologic responses after local delivery in a murine model for restenosis on underlying atherosclerotic arteries. Heart. 2007;93:922-927.
47. Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting stents show superiority to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents in femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month Zilver PTX randomized study results. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:495-504.
48. Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, et al. Sustained safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for femoropopliteal lesions: 2-year follow-up from the Zilver PTX randomized and single-arm clinical studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2417-2427.
49. Ansel G. PTX Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: 4-Year Results. Paper presented at: Vascular Interventional Advances; October 8, 2013; Las Vegas, NV.
50. Zeller T, Dake MD, Tepe G, et al. Treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:274-281.
51. Abularrage CJ, Conrad MF, Hackney LA, et al. Long-term outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing endovascular infrainguinal interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(2):314-322.
52. Sabeti S, Mlekusch W, Amighi J, Minar E, Schillinger M. Primary patency of long-segment self-expanding nitinol stents in the femoropopliteal arteries. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(1):6-12.