Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1090-1095

  Dick, Petra ^a   Wallner, Hubert ^a   Sabeti, Schila ^a   Loewe, Christian ^a   Mlekusch, Wolfgang ^a   Lammer, Johannes ^a   Koppensteiner, Renate ^a   Minar, Erich ^a   Schillinger, Martin ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Percutaneous; Peripheral artery disease; Stents

Indexed keywords

NITINOL;

AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTERY PUNCTURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESTENOSIS; SELF EXPANDABLE STENT; STENT; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; WALKING;

AGED; ALLOYS; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; AUSTRIA; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; ISCHEMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECURRENCE; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; VASCULAR PATENCY; WALKING;

EID: 72249093226     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22128     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, Cejna M, Lammer J, Minar E. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1879-1888. (Pubitemid 43872689)
2. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, Loewe C, Cejna M, Lammer J, Minar E. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation 2007;115:2745-2749. (Pubitemid 46842791)
3. Krankenberg H, Schluter M, Steinkamp HJ, Burgelin K, et al. Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length: The femoral artery stenting trial (FAST). Circulation 2007;116:285-292. (Pubitemid 47196564)
4. Saxon RR, Dake MD, Volgelzang RL, Katzen BT, Becker GJ. Randomized, multicenter study comparing expanded polytetra-fluoroethylene-covered endoprosthesis placement with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:823-832.
5. Henry M, Amor M, Beyar R, Henry I, Porte JM, Mentre B, Tricoche O, Ethevenot G. Clinical experience with a new nitinol self-expanding stent in peripheral arteries. J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:369-379. (Pubitemid 26411946)
6. Vogel TR, Shindelman LE, Nackman GB, Graham AM. Efficacious use of nitinol stents in the femoral and popliteal arteries. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:1178-1184.
7. Dick P, Sabeti S, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, Amighi J, Haumer M, Cejna M, Minar E, Schillinger M. Conventional balloon angioplasty versus peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis: Initial experience. Radiology 2008;248:297-302.
8. Cejna M, Thurnher S, Illiasch H, Horvath W, Waldenberger P, Hornik K, Lammer J. PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: A multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:23-31. (Pubitemid 32097991)
9. Grimm J, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, Hilbert C, Brossmann J, Heller M. Randomized study to compare PTA alone versus PTA with Palmaz stent placement for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:935-942. (Pubitemid 32756862)
10. Lofberg AM, Karacagil S, Ljungman C, Westman B, Bostrom A, Hellberg A, Ostholm G. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the femoropopliteal arteries in limbs with chronic critical lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:114-121. (Pubitemid 33660698)
11. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007;45(Suppl):S5-S67. (Pubitemid 46151680)
12. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter- Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000;31:S1-S296.
13. Schlager O, Francesconi M, Haumer M, Dick P, Sabeti S, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Koppensteiner R, Minar E, Schillinger M. Duplex sonography versus angiography for assessment of femoropopliteal arterial disease in a "real-world" setting. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:452-459.
14. Ranke C, Creutzig A, Alexander K. Duplex scanning of the peripheral arteries: Correlation of the peak velocity ratio with angiographic diameter reduction. Ultrasound Med Biol 1992;18:433-440.
15. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, Fry PD, Doyle DL, Taylor DC, Hsiang YN, Machan LS. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1085-1091. (Pubitemid 36363055)
16. Letourneau-Guillon L, Soulez G, Beaudoin G, Oliva VL, Giroux MF, Qin Z, Boussion N, Therasse E, De Guise J, Cloutier G. CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:615-624. (Pubitemid 38758448)
17. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Bezzi M, Pediconi F, Danti M, Nofroni I, Passariello R. Infrarenal aortic and lowerextremity arterial disease: Diagnostic performance of multidetector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004;231:555-563. (Pubitemid 38552917)
18. Adriaensen ME, Kock MC, Stijnen T, van Sambeek MR, van Urk H, Pattynama PM, Myriam Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: Therapeutic confidence of CT versus digital subtraction angiography and effects on additional imaging recommendations. Radiology 2004;233:385-391. (Pubitemid 39423796)
19. Hunink MG, Donaldson MC, Meyerovitz MF, Polak JF, Whittemore AD, Kandarpa K, Grassi CJ, Aruny J, Harrington DP, Mannick JA. Risks and benefits of femoropopliteal percutaneous balloon angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:183-192; discussion 192-194.
20. Matsi PJ, Manninen HI, Vanninen RL, Suhonen MT, Oksala I, Laakso M, Hakkarainen T, Soimakallio S. Femoropopliteal angioplasty in patients with claudication: Primary and secondary patency in 140 limbs with 1-3-year follow-up. Radiology 1994;191:727-733. (Pubitemid 24177892)
21. Jamsen TS, Manninen HI, Jaakkola PA, Matsi PJ. Long-term outcome of patients with claudication after balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal arteries. Radiology 2002;225:345-352.
22. Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, Scheinert D, Zeller T, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare nitinol stent for obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: The SIROCCO II trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:331-338. (Pubitemid 40354849)
23. Karch LA, Mattos MA, Henretta JP, McLafferty RB, Ramsey DE, Hodgson KJ. Clinical failure after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:880-887.
24. Capek P, McLean GK, Berkowitz HD. Femoropopliteal angioplasty. Factors influencing long-term success. Circulation 1991;83(2 Suppl):I70-I80.