Quarter regular dose non-enhanced CT for urinary stone: Added value of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1137-1144

  Kim, Seung Ho ^a   Baek, Soo Heui ^a   Yoon, Jung Hee ^a   Lim, Yun Jung ^a   Baek, Hye Jin ^a   Kim, Seon Jeong ^a   Eun, Choong Ki ^a  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

computed tomography; image reconstruction; Iterative reconstruction; radiation dosage; urinary stone

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; RADIATION HAZARDS;

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTIONS; RECURRENCE RATES; URINARY STONES;

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FLANK PAIN; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; NOISE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URETER STONE; UROLITHIASIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; URINARY CALCULI;

EID: 84901507615     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113513761     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Curhan GC. Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2007; 34: 287-293
2. Bartoletti R, Cai T, Mondaini N, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors in urolithiasis. Urol Int. 2007; 79 (Suppl 1): 3-7
3. Dhar M, Denstedt JD. Imaging in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of stone patients. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009; 16: 39-47
4. Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O, et al. Does ultra-low dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi?. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30: 44-50
5. Eikefjord EN, Thorsen F, Rørvik J. Comparison of effective radiation doses in patients undergoing unenhanced in patients undergoing unenhanced MDCT and excretory urography for acute flank pain. Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 934-939
6. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 2071-2077
7. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009; 251: 175-184
8. Desai GS, Uppot RN, Yu EW, et al. Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 1631-1640
9. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 764-771
10. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical reconstruction: A pilot study. Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195: 126-131
11. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. Abdominal CT: comparision of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195: 713-719
12. Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, et al. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: W743-W752
13. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 202-210
14. Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 138-143
15. Shuman WP. Adaptive iterative reconstruction in CT: what does it do?. How can I use it?. See http://www. imagewisely.org/-/media/ImageWisely%20Files/Imaging% 20Physicians/IW-Shuman-ASIR1.pdf. IMAGE WISELY website
16. Kim SY, Lee KH, Kim K, et al. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low-versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 2011; 260: 437-445
17. Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1596-1605
18. Kulkarni NM, Uppot RN, Eisner BH, et al. Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go?. Radiology. 2012; 265: 158-166
19. International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37: 1-34
20. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-specific dose estimates(SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations AAPM report no 204. College Park, MD: AAPM, 2011: 1-26
21. Bankier AA, Kressel HY. Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and reduction in CT. Radiology. 2012; 265: 4-8
22. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2010; 257: 373-383
23. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology. 2011; 259: 565-573
24. European Guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg: European Communities; 2000
25. Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, et al. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012; 36: 339-346
26. Caoili EM, Inampudi P, Cohan RH, et al. Optimization of multi-detector row CT urography: effect of compression, saline administration, and prolongation of acquisition delay. Radiology. 2005; 235: 116-123
27. Genders TS, Spronk S, Stijnen T, et al. Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology. 2012; 265: 910-916
28. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 927-933
29. Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative recon-struction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralowdose with standard-dose imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199: 1266-1274
30. Kim SH. Shim HS, Yoon JH, et al. Post-operative half -dose follow-up CT for patients with stomach cancer: optimal blending ratio of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance (abstr SSM08-05). In: 2012 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Annual Meeting Program. Chicago, USA. See http://rsna2012.rsna.org/search