Radiation dose reduction with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 339-346

  Kalra, Mannudeep K ^a   Woisetschläger, Mischa ^b   Dahlström, Nils ^b   Singh, Sarabjeet ^a   Lindblom, Maria ^b   Choy, Garry ^a   Quick, Petter ^b   Schmidt, Bernhard ^c   Sedlmair, Martin ^c   Blake, Michael A ^c   Persson, Anders ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

filtered back projection; iterative reconstruction; multiYdetector row CT; radiation dose

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; DOSIMETRY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MEDICAL IMAGING;

ABDOMINAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; IMAGE NOISE; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; LOW DOSE; MULTIYDETECTOR-ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTIONS; RECONSTRUCTION IMAGE; SINOGRAMS;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DESCENDING AORTA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; LIVER; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SINOGRAM AFFIRMED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 84861502180     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825586c0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission.tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;1:113-122.
2. Lange K, Carson R. EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and.transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8: 306-316.
3. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV, et al. Low-dose CT of the abdomen:.evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction.filters pilot study. Radiology. 2003;228:251-256.
4. Kalra MK, Wittram C, Maher MM, et al. Can noise reduction filters.improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study.Radiology. 2003;228:257-264.
5. Singh S, Kalra MK, Sung MK, et al. Dose reduction with non.linear adaptive filters for abdominal CT. World J Radiol. 2012;4:13-20.
6. Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G. CT iterative reconstruction in image.space: a phantom study. Phys Med. 2012;28:161-165.
7. Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M, et al. Iterative.reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography:.initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:1081-1087.
8. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative.reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT:.a pilot study. Radiology. 2011;259:565-573.
9. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of.adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction.techniques. Radiology. 2010;257:373-383.
10. Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, et al. Low-tube-voltage,.high-tube- current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality.and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative.reconstruction algorithmVinitial clinical experience. Radiology. 2010;254:145-153.
11. Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Müller HC, et al. Iterative reconstruction.algorithm for abdominal multidetector ct at different tube voltages:.assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose.in a phantom study. Radiology. 2011;260:454-462.
12. Task Group on Control of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography.Managing patient dose in computed tomography: a report of the.International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2000;30:7-5.
13. Barrett HH, Swindell W. Radiological ImagingVThe Theory of.Image Formation, Detection and Processing. New York, NY:.Academic Press, Harcourt Brace & Company; 1981.