Internet and participation: The case of digital participatory budgeting in Belo Horizonte;Internet e participação: O caso do orçamento participativo digital de belo horizonte

RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 296-308

  Cunha, Maria Alexandra Viegas Cortez Da ^a   Coelho, Taiane Ritta ^a   Pozzebon, Marlei ^a,b  

^a FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS   (Brazil)

^b HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Critical Discourse Analysis; Digital Participatory Budget; E Participation; ICT; Social Representations Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901500220     PISSN: 00347590     EISSN: 2178938X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020140305     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abric, J. C. (1994). Méthodologie de recueil des représentations sociales. In J. C. Abric. Pratiques socials et représentations (pp. 59-82). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
2. Ainsworth, S, Hardy, C, & Harley, B. (2005). Online consultation: e-democracy and e-resistance in the case of the development gateway. Management Comunication Quartely, 19(1), 120-145.
3. Audebrand, L, & Iacobus, A. (2008). Avoiding potential traps in fair trade marketing: a social representation perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(1), 3-19.
4. Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133-146.
5. Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: populism, community and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160.
6. Boon, A, Jansen, M, & Veenestra, A. F. (2011). Measure to improve: a study of eParticipation in frontrunner Dutch municipalities. International Federation for Information Processing, 6847, 157-168.
7. Brooke, C. (2002). What does it mean to be 'critical' in IS research? Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 49-57.
8. Contarello, A, & Sarrica, M. (2007). ICTs, social thinking and subjective well-being-the internet and its representations in everyday life. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 1016-1032.
9. Cukier, W, Ngwenyama, O, Bauer, R, & Midletton, C. (2008). A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Info Systems Journal, 19(2), 175-196.
10. Dertouzos, M. (1997). What will be: how the new information marketplace will change our lives. San Francisco: Harper.
11. Doolin, B. (1998). Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 301-311.
12. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analyses: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
13. Fairclough, N. (1996). A reply to Henry Winddowson's discourse analyses: a critical view. Language and Literature, 5(1), 49-56.
14. Gal, U, & Berente, N. (2008). A social representations perspective on information systems implementation: rethinking the concept of "frames". Information Technology & People, 21(2), 133-154.
15. Hardy, C, & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy,C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.). Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 299-316). London: Sage.
16. Kaganer, E, & Vaast, E. (2010). Responding to the (almost) unknown: social representations and corporate policies of social media. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Saint Louis, MO, USA. Retrieved 3 September, 2012 from http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/163.
17. Kling, R. (Ed.). (1996). Hopes and horrors: technological utopianism and anti-utopianism in narratives of computerization. In R. Kling. Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu, HI, USA.
19. Macintosh, A. (2007). Challenges and barriers of eParticipation in Europe? Mendeley. Retrieved 27 May, 2012, from http://www.sweden.gov.se/content/1/c6/08/49/42/9d411e53.pdf
20. Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
21. Moscovici, S. (2001). The phenomenon of social representations. In G. Duveen (Ed.). Social representations: explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.
22. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.
23. Ngwenyama, O. K, & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextually of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145-167.
24. Pawlowski, S. D, Kaganer, E. A, & Cater, J. J, III (2007). Focusing the research agenda on burnout in IT: social representations of burnout in the profession. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(5), 612-627.
25. Pinho, J. A. G. (2011). Sociedade da informação, capitalismo e sociedade civil: reflexões sobre política, internet e democracia na realidade brasileira. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 51(1), 98-106.
26. Pozzebon, M. (2003). The implementation of configurablet Technolo-gies: negotiations between global principles and local contexts. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canadá.
27. Prefeitura BH (2008). Revista Comemorativa do Orçamento Participativo de Belo Horizonte-15 anos.
28. Puri, S. K, & Sahay, S. (2007). Role of ICTs in participatory development: an Indian experience. Information Technology for Development, 13(2), 133-160.
29. Rose, J, Grönlund, A, & Andersen, K. V. (2007). What is eParticipation?. In A. Avdic, K. Hedström, J. Rose, Å. Grönlund (Eds.). Understanding eParticipation: contemporary PhD eParticipation studies in Europe. Sweden: örebro University Library.
30. SæbØ, Ø, Rose, J, & Flak, K. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400-428.
31. Savazoni, R, & Cohn, S. (Orgs.). (2009). Cultura digital.br. Rio de Janeiro: Beco do Azougue.
32. Sorj, B. (2003). Brasil@povo.com: a luta contra a desigualdade na sociedade de informação. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
33. Susha, I, & Grönlund, A. (2012). eParticipation research: systematizing the field. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 373-382.
34. Thompson, M. P. A. (2004). ICT, power, and developmental discourse: a critical analysis. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(4), 1-26.
35. Vaast, E. (2007). Danger is in the eye of the beholders: social representations of information systems security in healthcare. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(2), 130-152.
36. Vaast, E, & Walsham, G. (2005). Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organization, 15(1), 65-89.
37. Vergara, S. C, & Ferreira, V. C. P. (2005). A representação social de ONGs segundo formadores de opinião do município do Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Administração Pública, 39(5), 1137-1159.
38. Winner, L. (1986). Myth information: romantic politics in the information age. In C. Mitcham & A. Huning (Eds.). Philosophy and technology II: information technology and computers in theory and practice. Holanda: D. Reidel Publishing Company.