Influence and interactions of multi-factors on the bioavailability of PAHs in compost amended contaminated soils

Chemosphere

Volumn 107, Issue , 2014, Pages 43-50

  Wu, Guozhong ^a,b,c   Li, Xingang ^b,d   Kechavarzi, Cédric ^a   Sakrabani, Ruben ^a   Sui, Hong ^b,d   Coulon, Frédéric ^a,e  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d National Engineering Research Centre for Distillation Technology   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Bioavailability; Compost; Conjoint analysis; Interactions; PAH

Indexed keywords

BEAM PLASMA INTERACTIONS; BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPOSTING; DECISION MAKING; HYDROCARBONS; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; REMEDIATION; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BIOAVAILABILITY; COMPETITIVE SORPTION; COMPOST AMENDMENTS; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CONTAMINATED SOILS; MULTIPLE FACTORS; PAH BIOAVAILABILITY; SOIL REMEDIATION;

SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL;

HYDROCARBON; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON;

BIOAVAILABILITY; COMPOST; DECISION MAKING; HYDROCARBON; PAH; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION;

ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; COMPOST; DEGRADATION; RECYCLING; SOIL; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL POLLUTION;

BIOAVAILABILITY; COMPOST; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; INTERACTIONS; PAH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; FERTILIZERS; POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS, AROMATIC; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84901451927     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.035     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1998, 80:64-75.
2. Alriksson S., Öberg T. Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation: a review of methods and applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 2008, 15:244-257.
3. Álvarez-Farizo B., Hanley N. Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain. Energy Policy 2002, 30:107-116.
4. Bamforth S.M., Singleton I. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: current knowledge and future directions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80:723-736.
5. Barnsley E. Bacterial oxidation of naphthalene and phenanthrene. J. Bacteriol. 1983, 153:1069-1071.
6. Bradley, N., 2007. The Response Surface Methodology. Msc Thesis. Indiana University South Bend.
7. Briceno G., Palma G., Duran N. Influence of organic amendment on the biodegradation and movement of pesticides. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tecnol. 2007, 37:233-271.
8. BSI PAS100: 2011 Specification for composted materials 2011, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
9. Cheung H.D., Chung T.M. A study on subjective preference to daylit residential indoor environment using conjoint analysis. Build. Environ. 2008, 43:2101-2111.
10. Couling N.R., Towell M.G., Semple K.T. Biodegradation of PAHs in soil: influence of chemical structure, concentration and multiple amendment. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:3411-3420.
11. Cox L., Cecchi A., Celis R., Hermosin M., Koskinen W., Cornejo J. Effect of exogenous carbon on movement of simazine and 2, 4-D in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65:1688-1695.
12. Eaton R.W., Chapman P.J. Bacterial metabolism of naphthalene: construction and use of recombinant bacteria to study ring cleavage of 1, 2-dihydroxynaphthalene and subsequent reactions. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174:7542-7554.
13. Farber S., Griner B. Valuing watershed quality improvements using conjoint analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 34:63-76.
14. Gan, C., 1992. A conjoint analysis of wetland-based recreation: a case study of Louisiana waterfowl hunting. PhD Thesis. Louisiana State University.
15. Green P., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J. Mark. 1990, 54:3-19.
16. Gregory R., Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J. Risk Uncertainty 1993, 7:177-197.
17. Hair J., Black B., Babin B., Anderson R., Tatham R. Multivariate Data Analysis 2006, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 6th ed.
18. Johnson F., Desvousges W. Estimating stated preferences with rated-pair data: environmental, health, and employment effects of energy programs. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1997, 34:79-99.
19. Kördel, W., Bernhardt, C., Derz, K., Hund-Rinke, K., Harmsen, J., Peijnenburg, W., Comans, R., Terytze, K., 2013. Incorporating availability/bioavailability in risk assessment and decision making of polluted sites, using Germany as an example. J. Hazard. Mater., . doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.1005.1017.
20. Lareau T., Rae D. Valuing WTP for diesel odor reductions: an application of contingent ranking technique. Southern Econ. J. 1989, 55:728-742.
21. Latawiec A.E., Swindell A.L., Simmons P., Reid B.J. Bringing bioavailability into contaminated land decision making: the way forward?. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tecnol. 2011, 41:52-77.
22. Lohrke F.T., Holloway B.B., Woolley T.W. Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research a review and research agenda. Organ. Res. Meth. 2010, 13:16-30.
23. Lord, R.A., Atkinson, J., Scurlock, J.M.O., Lane, A.N., Rahman, P.K.S.M., Connolly, H.E., Street, G., 2007. Biomass, remediation, re-generation (BioReGen Life Project): reusing brownfield sites for renewable energy crops. In: Proceedings 15th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition, 7-11 May 2007, Milan.
24. Mackenzie J., Eduljee B.R. Conjoint-analysis of demand for waterfowl hunting. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1990, 72. 1360-1360.
25. Madurantakam P.A., Rodriguez I.A., Cost C.P., Viswanathan R., Simpson D.G., Beckman M.J., Moon P.C., Bowlin G.L. Multiple factor interactions in biomimetic mineralization of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5456-5464.
26. McCoullough D. A user's guide to conjoint analysis: before starting out you need to know where the landmines are. Market Res. 2002, 14:18-23.
27. Muramatsu R., Nakamura Y. Evaluation of lighting environment using conjoint analysis (Part 1) - for the case of office. J. Light Visual Environ. 2002, 26:30-39.
28. Namkoong W., Hwang E.Y., Park J.S., Choi J.Y. Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil with composting. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119:23-31.
29. Opaluch J., Swallow S., Weaver T., Wessells C., Wichelns D. Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: including public preferences in current siting mechanisms. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1993, 24:41-59.
30. Ortega-Calvo, J., Tejeda-Agredano, M., Jimenez-Sanchez, C., Congiu, E., Sungthong, R., Niqui-Arroyo, J., Cantos, M., 2013. Is it possible to increase bioavailability but not environmental risk of PAHs in bioremediation? J. Hazard. Mater., . doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.1003.1042.
31. Peace G.S. Taguchi Methods: A Hands-on Approach 1993, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
32. Puglisi E., Cappa F., Fragoulis G., Trevisan M., Del Re A.A.M. Bioavailability and degradation of phenanthrene in compost amended soils. Chemosphere 2007, 67:548-556.
33. Reid B.J., Fermor T.R., Semple K.T. Induction of PAH-catabolism in mushroom compost and its use in the biodegradation of soil associated phenanthrene. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 118:65-73.
34. Reid B.J., Jones K.C., Semple K.T. Bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soils and sediments - a perspective on mechanisms, consequences and assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 108:103-112.
35. Roe B., Boyle K., Teisl M. Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1996, 31:145-159.
36. Sandrin T.R., Maier R.M. Impact of metals on the biodegradation of organic pollutants. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111:1093-1101.
37. Sayara T., Sarrà M., Sánchez A. Effects of compost stability and contaminant concentration on the bioremediation of PAHs-contaminated soil through composting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179:999-1006.
38. Semple K.T., Morriss A.W.J., Paton G.I. Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils: fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2003, 54:809-818.
39. Semple K.T., Reid B.J., Fermor T.R. Impact of composting strategies on the treatment of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 112:269-283.
40. SEPA, 2011. Paragraph 9 Exemption for "The reclamation or improvement of land". Scottish Environment Protection Agency. <>. http://www.sepa.org.uk.
41. Stuart B., Bowlen G., Kosson D. Competivive sorption of benzene, toluene and the xylenes onto soil. Environ. Prog. 1991, 10:104-109.
42. Bioremediation, Encyclopedia of Microbiology 1992, Academic Press, San Diego, California. J.M. Thomas, C.H. Ward, R.L. Raymond, J.T. Wilson, R.C. Loehr (Eds.).
43. White J.C., Hunter M., Pignatello J.J., Alexander M. Increase in bioavailability of aged phenanthrene in soils by competitive displacement with pyrene. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1999, 18:1728-1732.
44. Wu G., Kechavarzi C., Li X., Sui H., Pollard S.J.T., Coulon F. Influence of mature compost amendment on total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2013, 90:2240-2246.
45. Wu G., Kechavarzi C., Li X., Wu S., Pollard S.J., Sui H., Coulon F. Machine learning models for predicting PAHs bioavailability in compost amended soils. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 223:747-754.