A study on subjective preference to daylit residential indoor environment using conjoint analysis

Building and Environment

Volumn 43, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2101-2111

  Cheung, H D ^a   Chung, T M ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Daylight; Indoor environment; Part worth; Utility

Indexed keywords

GLARE; LIGHTING; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

ASSESSMENT METHODS; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; DAYLIGHT; FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGN; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT; INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS; PART-WORTH; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RELATIVE IMPACT; SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE; SUNLIGHT PENETRATION; USER FRIENDLINESS; UTILITY;

OPTICAL PROPERTIES;

BUILDING; LIGHT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 49149106505     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cuttle C. People and windows in workplaces. In: Proceedings of the people and physical environment research conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 1983. p. 203-12.
2. Heerwagen J.H., and Heerwagen D.R. Lighting and psychological comfort. Lighting Design and Application 16 4 (1986) 47-51
3. Veitch J.A., Hine D.W., and Gifford R. End users' knowledge, beliefs, and preferences for lighting. Journal of Interior Design 19 2 (1993) 15-26
4. Veitch J.A., and Gifford R. Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood, and social behavior. Environment and Behavior 28 4 (1996) 446-470
5. Loe D.L., Mansfield K.P., and Rowlands E. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology 26 3 (1994) 119-133
6. Parpairi K., Baker N.V., Steemers K.A., and Compagnon R. The luminance differences index: a new indicator of user preferences in daylit spaces. Lighting Research and Technology 34 1 (2002) 53-68
7. Velds M. User acceptance studies to evaluate discomfort glare in daylit rooms. Solar Energy 73 2 (2002) 95-103
8. Han S., Ishida T., and Iwai W. Visual impression of lighting from window and a ceiling: the effect of their compound ratio. Journal of Light and Visual Environment 29 1 (2005) 25-33
9. Han S., Ishida T., Iguchi M., and Iwai W. Visual impression of lighting from a window and a ceiling: a comparison between the compound lighting and the uniform lighting. Journal of Light and Visual Environment 30 2 (2006) 87-93
10. Ochoa C.E., and Capeluto I.G. Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates. Building and Environment 41 (2006) 1128-1135
11. Kim S.Y., and Kim J.J. Influence of light fluctuation on occupant visual perception. Building and Environment 42 (2007) 2888-2899
12. Nabil A., and Mardaljevic J. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Research and Technology 37 1 (2005) 41-59
13. Fontoynont M. Perceived performance of daylighting systems: lighting efficacy and agreeableness. Solar Energy 73 2 (2002) 83-94
14. Fishbein M. An investigation of relationship between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. Human Relations 16 (1967) 233-240
15. Matsui T, Aono S, Kuwano S. Economic valuation of various noises by using conjoint analysis. In: Proceedings of the 18th international congress on acoustics, Kyoto, Japan, 2004, Th.P2.1.
16. Ujigawa M., and Sanui J. An application of the part worth function on ski-resort planning: a study on skier's evaluation for ski-resort planning Part 2. AIJ Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering 477 (1995) 47-52
17. Ninomiya H., Kikuchi H., Ikeda M., and Nagayoshi H. An analysis of consumer preferences for the commercial sport club: a conjoint analysis approach. Research of Physical Education 38 4 (1993) 279-290
18. Muramatsu R., and Nakamura Y. Evaluation of lighting environment using conjoint analysis (Part 1)-for the case of office. Journal of Light and Visual Environment 26 3 (2002) 30-39
19. Peace G.S. Taguchi methods: a hands-on approach (1993), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
20. Collins B. Windows and people: a literature survey: psychological reaction to environments with and without windows. Building Science Series, vol. 70, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1975.
21. Collins B. Review of the psychological reaction to windows. Lighting Research and Technology 8 2 (1976) 80-88
22. Veitch J.A., and Newsham G.R. Determinants of lighting quality I: state of the science. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 27 (1998) 92-106
23. Galasiu A.D., and Veitch J.A. Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control system in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 728-742