Acceptance of nanotechnology applications and satisfaction with food-related life in southern Chile

Food Science and Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 157-163

  Schnettler, Berta ^a   Crisóstomo, Gloria ^a   Mora, Marcos ^b   Lobos, Germán ^c   Miranda, Horacio ^a   Grunert, Klaus G ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA   (Chile)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Nanotechnology in food; Nanotechnology in packaging; Satisfaction with food related life

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901439042     PISSN: 01012061     EISSN: 1678457X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-20612014005000001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adimark. Mapa socioeconómico de Chile. (2004). Retrieved from: http://www.adimark.cl/medios/estudios/informe_mapa_socioeconomico_de_chile.pdf
2. Bieberstein, A., Roosen, J., Marette, S., Blanchemanche, S., & Vandermoere, F. (2013). Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packaging in France and Germany. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(1), 73-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr069
3. Chaudhry, Q., Scotter, M., Blackburn, J., Ross, B., Boxall, A., Castle, L., Aitken, R., & Watkins, R. (2008). Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Additives and Contaminants, 25(3), 241-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030701744538
4. De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Storozhenko, S., Liqun, G., Lambert, W., Van Der Straeten, D., & Viaene, J. (2010). Willingness-to-accept and purchase genetically modified rice with high folate content in Shanxi Province, China. Appetite, 54(1), 118-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.09.017
5. Eurobarometer. (2006). Risk issues. Special eurobarometer 238/Wave 64.1. Brussels: TNS Opinion & Social.
6. Fernández, A. (2002). Investigación y técnicas de mercado (1rd ed.). Madrid: Editorial Esic.
7. Forbe, T., García, M., & Gonzalez, E. (2011). Potencial risks of nanoparticles. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 31(4), 835-842.
8. Frewer, L. J., Bergmann, K., Brennan, M., Lion, R., Meertens, R., Rowe, G., Siegrist, M., & Vereijken, C. (2011). Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 22(8), 442-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.005
9. García, M., Forbe, T., & Gonzalez, E. (2010). Potential application of nanotechnology in the agro-food sector. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30(3), 573-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612010000300002
10. Gruère, G. (2012). Implications of nanotechnology growth in food and agriculture in OECD countries. Food Policy, 37(2), 191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.01.001
11. Grunert, K., Dean, D., Raats, M., Nielsen, N., & Lumbers M. (2007). A measure of satisfaction with food-related life. Appetite, 49(2), 486-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.010
12. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Otero (5rd. ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall Internacional.
13. Hosseini, A., Goddard, E., Vandermoere, F., Blanchemanche, S., Bieberstein, A., Marette, S., & Roosen, J. (2012) Do environmental attitudes and food technology neophobia affect perceptions of the benefits of nanotechnology? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(2), 149-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01090.x
14. Kay, L., & Shapira, F. (2009). Developing nanotechnology in Latin America. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(2), 259-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9503-z
15. Kuhfeld, W. (2012). Marketing research methods in SAS. Experimental design, choice, conjoint and Graphical techniques. SAS 9.2 Edition. Retrieved from: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010.pdf
16. Miller, D. (2010). Food nanotechnology: new leverage against iron deficiency. Nature Nanotechnology, 5(5), 318-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.91
17. Mucci, A., Hough, G., & Ziliani, C. (2004). Factors that influence purchase intent and perceptions of genetically modified foods among Argentine consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 15(6), 559-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.004
18. Nayga, R. M., Fisher, M., & Onyango, B. (2006). Acceptance of genetically modified food: comparing consumer perspectives in the United States and South Korea. Agricultural Economics, 34(3), 331-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00129.x
19. Reisch, L., Scholl, G., & Bietz, S. (2011). Better safe than sorry: consumer perceptions of and deliberations on nanotechnologies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(6), 644-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00979.x
20. Rollin, F., Kennedy, J., & Wills, J. (2011). Consumers and new food technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 22(2-3), 99-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.001
21. Roosen, J., Bieberstein, A., Marette, S., Blanchemanche, S., & Vandermoere, F. (2011). The effect of information choice and discussion on consumers' willingness-to-pay for nanotechnology in food. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36(2), 365-374.
22. Schnettler, B., Avila, R., Sepúlveda, N., Miranda, H., Sepúlveda, J., & Denegri, M. (2010). Preference for beef with different types of genetic modification in Temuco, La Araucanía Region, Chile. Revista Cientifica-Facultad de Ciências Vererinarias, 20(5), 537-545.
23. Schnettler, B., Crisóstomo, G., Mills, N., Miranda, H., Mora, M., Lobos, G., & Grunert, K. G. (2013a). Preferences for sunflower oil produced conventionally, produced with nanotechnology or genetically modified in the Araucanía Region of Chile. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria, 40(1), 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202013000100002
24. Schnettler, B., Crisóstomo, G., Sepúlveda, J., Mora, M., Lobos, G., Miranda, H., & Grunert, K. G. (2013b). Food neophobia, nanotechnology and satisfaction with life. Appetite, 69, 71-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.014
25. Schnettler, B., Miranda, H., Sepúlveda, J., Denegri, M., Mora, M., Lobos, G., & Grunert, K. G. (2013c). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Food-Related Life Scale: application in southern Chile. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 45(5), 443-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2012.08.003
26. Schnettler, B., Reyes, P., Henríquez, J., Ruff, P., Sepúlveda, J., Denegri, M., Miranda, H., Sepúlveda, N., & Lobos, G. (2011). Preferences for Lamb's Meat in Supermarkets in Temuco, La Araucanía Region, Chile. Revista Cientifica-Facultad de Ciências Vererinarias, 20(5), 537-545.
27. Schnettler, B., Sepúlveda, O., Ruiz, D., & Denegri, M. (2008). Differentiated perception of transgenic tomato sauce in the southern Chile. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion, 58(1), 49-58.
28. Schnettler, B., Shene, C., Rubilar, M., Miranda, H., Sepúlveda, J., Denegri, M., & Lobos, G. (2010). Acceptance of yoghurt with different functional ingredients among consumers in supermarkets in southern Chile. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion, 60(4), 380-390.
29. Siegrist, M. (2008). Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(11), 603-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.017
30. Siegrist, M., Cousin, M., Kastenholz, H., & Wiek, K. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49(2), 459-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.002
31. Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., & Kastenholz, H. (2009). Acceptance of nanotechnology foods: a conjoint study examining consumers' willingness to buy. British Food Journal, 111(7), 660-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700910972350
32. Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., Kastenholz, H., & Keller, C. (2008). Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite, 51(2), 283-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.020
33. Stampfli, N., Siegrist, M., & Kastenholz, H. (2010). Acceptance of nanotechnology in food and food packaging: a path model analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 13(3), 353-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870903233303