Starch degradation in rumen fluid as influenced by genotype, climatic conditions and maturity stage of maize, grown under controlled conditions

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 193, Issue , 2014, Pages 58-70

  Ali, M ^a   Cone, J W ^a   Hendriks, W H ^a   Struik, P C ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Feeding value; Growth temperature; Maize (Zea mays L.); Maturity stage; Rumen degradation; Starch

Indexed keywords

BOS; BOVIDAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84901393412     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anker-Nilssen K., Færgestad E.M., Sahlstrøm S., Uhlen A.K. Interaction between barley cultivars and growth temperature on starch degradation properties measured in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 130:3-22.
2. Bhullar S., Jenner C. Effects of temperature on the conversion of sucrose to starch in the developing wheat endosperm. Funct. Plant Biol. 1986, 13:605-615.
3. Canizares G.L., Gonçalves H., Costa C., Rodrigues L., Menezes J., Gomes H., Marques R., Branco R. Use of high moisture corn silage replacing dry corn on intake, apparent digestibility, production and composition of milk of dairy goats. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40:860-865.
4. Chai W.Z., Van Gelder A.H., Cone J.W. Relationship between gas production and starch degradation in feed samples. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 114:195-204.
5. Commuri P.D., Jones R.J. High temperatures during endosperm cell division in maize: a genotypic comparison under in vitro and field conditions. Crop Sci. 2001, 41:1122-1130.
6. Cone J.W., Van Gelder A.H., Van Schooten H.A., Groten J.A.M. Effects of forage maize type and maturity stage on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci. 2008, 55(2):139-154.
7. Cone J.W., Van Gelder A.H., Visscher G.J.W., Oudshoorn L. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 61:113-128.
8. Crowe T.C., Seligman S.A., Copeland L. Inhibition of enzymic digestion of amylose by free fatty acids in vitro contributes to resistant starch formation. J. Nutr. 2000, 130:2006-2008.
9. Cui R., Oates C. The effect of amylose-lipid complex formation on enzyme susceptibility of sago starch. Food Chem. 1999, 65:417-425.
10. Duvick D.N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv. Agron. 2005, 86:83-145.
11. Ettle T., Lebzien P., Flachowsky G., Schwarz F. Effect of harvest date and variety on ruminal degradability of ensiled maize grains in dairy cows. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2001, 55:69-84.
12. Ettle T., Schwarz F.J. Effect of maize variety harvested at different maturity stages on feeding value and performance of dairy cows. Anim. Res. 2003, 52:337-349.
13. Fankhauser J.J., Volenec J.J., Brown G.A. Composition and structure of starch from taproots of contrasting genotypes of Medicago sativa L. Plant Physiol. 1989, 90:1189-1194.
14. Fox G., Manley M. Hardness methods for testing maize kernels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57:5647-5657.
15. Frei O.M. Changes in yield physiology of corn as a result of breeding in northern Europe. Maydica 2000, 45:173-183.
16. Hetta M., Mussadiq Z., Gustavsson A.M., Swensson C. Effects of hybrid and maturity on performance and nutritive characteristics of forage maize at high latitudes, estimated using the gas production technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 171:20-30.
17. Hibberd C.A., Wagner D.G., Schemm R.L., Mitchell E.D., Hintz R.L., Weibel D.E. Nutritive characteristics of different varieties of sorghum and corn grains. J. Anim. Sci. 1982, 55:665-672.
18. Holm J., Björck I., Ostrowska S., Eliasson A.C., Asp N.G., Larsson K., Lundquist I. Digestibility of amylose-lipid complexes in-vitro and in-vivo. Starch/Stärke 1983, 35:294-297.
19. ISO 5984 Animal Feeding Stuffs. Determination of Crude Ash 2002, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. ISO 6496 Animal Feeding Stuffs. Determination of Moisture and Other Volatile Matter Content 1999, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
21. Jackson D.S. Starch: structure, properties, and determination. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences Nutrition 2003, 5561-5567. Academic Press, Oxford. second ed.
22. Jenner C.F. Starch synthesis in the kernel of wheat under high-temperature conditions. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 21:791-806.
23. Jensen C., Weisbjerg M.R., Nørgaard P., Hvelplund T. Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 118:279-294.
24. Keppler D., Decker K. Bestimmung mit amyloglucosidase. Methoden der Enzymatischen Analysen 1970, 2:1089-1099. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany. second ed.
25. Kotarski S.F., Waniska R.D., Thurn K.K. Starch hydrolysis by the ruminal microflora. J. Nutr. 1992, 122(1):178-190.
26. Li J.H., Vasanthan T., Hoover R., Rossnagel B.G. Starch from hull-less barley: V. in-vitro susceptibility of waxy, normal, and high-amylose starches towards hydrolysis by alpha-amylases and amyloglucosidase. Food Chem. 2004, 84:621-632.
27. Li J.H., Vasanthan T., Rossnagel B., Hoover R. Starch from hull-less barley: II. thermal, rheological and acid hydrolysis characteristics. Food Chem. 2001, 74:407-415.
28. Lichtenwalner R.E., Ellis E.B., Rooney L.W. Effect of incremental dosages of the waxy gene of sorghum on digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 1978, 46:1113-1119.
29. Marton C.L., Kálmán L., Árendás T., Bónis P., Szieberth D. Comparison of some methods for estimating vegetation periods in maize. Acta Agron. Hung. 2007, 55:1-5.
30. McAllister T.A., Phillippe R.C., Rode L.M., Cheng K.J. Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71:205-212.
31. Michalet-Doreau B., Champion M. Influence of maize genotype on rate of ruminal starch degradation. Ann. Zootech. 1995, 44:191.
32. Morrison W.R., Scott D.C., Karkalas J. Variation in the composition and physical properties of barley starches. Starch/Stärke 1986, 38:374-379.
33. Muchow R.C. Effect of high temperature on grain-growth in field-grown maize. Field Crops Res. 1990, 23:145-158.
34. Opatpatanakit Y., Kellaway R., Lean I., Annison G., Kirby A. Microbial fermentation of cereal grains in vitro. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1994, 45:1247-1263.
35. Pereira M.N., Von Pinho R.G., da Silva Bruno R.G., Calestine G.A. Ruminal degradability of hard or soft texture corn grain at three maturity stages. Sci. Agric. 2004, 61:358-363.
36. Philippeau C., Landry J., Michalet-Doreau B. Influence of the biochemical and physical characteristics of the maize grain on ruminal starch degradation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46:4287-4291.
37. Rebourg C., Chastanet M., Gouesnard B., Welcker C., Dubreuil P., Charcosset A. Maize introduction into Europe: the history reviewed in the light of molecular data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106:895-903.
38. Sadeghi A., Shawrang P. Effects of microwave irradiation on ruminal protein and starch degradation of corn grain. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 127:113-123.
39. SAS Statistical Analysis System Institute (version 9.02) 2002, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
40. Schwab E.C., Shaver R.D., Lauer J.G., Coors J.G. Estimating silage energy value and milk yield to rank corn hybrids. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 109:1-18.
41. Shannon J. Genetics and physiology of starch development. Starch, Chemistry Technology 1984, 25-86. Macmillan Publishing Solutions, Elsevier, USA. second ed.
42. Stevnebø A., Sahlström S., Svihus B. Starch structure and degree of starch hydrolysis of small and large starch granules from barley varieties with varying amylose content. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 130:23-38.
43. Struik P.C. Physiology of forage maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to its production and quality 1983, Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
44. Svihus B., Uhlen A.K., Harstad O.M. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 122:303-320.
45. Tester R.F. Influence of growth conditions on barley starch properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1997, 21:37-45.
46. Tester R.F., Morrison W.R., Ellis R.H., Piggo J.R., Batts G.R., Wheeler T.R., Morison J.I.L., Hadley P., Ledward D.A. Effects of elevated growth temperature and carbon dioxide levels on some physicochemical properties of wheat starch. J. Cereal Sci. 1995, 22:63-71.
47. Tester R.F., South J.B., Morrison W.R., Ellis R.P. The effects of ambient temperature during the grain-filling period on the composition and properties of starch from four barley genotypes. J. Cereal Sci. 1991, 13:113-127.
48. Theurer C.B. Grain processing effects on starch utilization by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 63:1649-1662.
49. Tolera A., Sundstøl F. Morphological fractions of maize stover harvested at different stages of grain maturity and nutritive value of different fractions of the stover. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1999, 81:1-16.
50. Tolera A., Sundstøl F., Said A.N. The effect of stage of maturity on yield and quality of maize grain and stover. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1998, 75:157-168.
51. Tollenaar M. Genetic improvement in grain yield of commercial maize hybrids grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Sci. 1989, 29:1365-1371.
52. Troyer A.F. Temperate corn-background, behavior, and breeding. Specialty Corns 2001, 393-466. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. second ed. A.R. Hallauer (Ed.).
53. Vasanthan T., Bhatty R. Physicochemical properties of small-and large-granule starches of waxy, regular, and high-amylose barleys. Cereal Chem. 1996, 73:199-207.
54. Vesterinen E., Myllärinen P., Forssell P., Söderling E., Autio K. Structural properties in relation to oral enzymatic digestibility of starch gels based on pure starch components and high amylose content. Food Hydrocol. 2002, 16:161-167.
55. Wilson D., Muchow R., Murgatroyd C. Model analysis of temperature and solar radiation limitations to maize potential productivity in a cool climate. Field Crops Res. 1995, 43:1-18.
56. Wolters M.G., Cone J.W. Prediction of degradability of starch by gelatinization enthalpy as measured by differential scanning calorimetry. Starch/Stärke 1992, 44:14-18.
57. Zhang T., Oates C.G. Relationship between α-amylase degradation and physico-chemical properties of sweet potato starches. Food Chem. 1999, 65:157-163.