Safety Assessment of Decyl Glucoside and Other Alkyl Glucosides as Used in Cosmetics

International Journal of Toxicology

Volumn 32, Issue , 2013, Pages 22S-48S

  Fiume, Monice M ^a   Heldreth, Bart ^a   Bergfeld, Wilma F ^a   Belsito, Donald V ^a   Hill, Ronald A ^a   Klaassen, Curtis D ^a   Liebler, Daniel ^a   Marks, James G ^a   Shank, Ronald C ^a   Slaga, Thomas J ^a   Snyder, Paul W ^a   Andersen, F Alan ^a  

^a Cosmetic Ingredient Review Scientific Analyst/Writer ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

decyl glucoside

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; DECYL GLUCOSIDE; GLUCOSIDE;

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; MUTAGEN TESTING; PRODUCT SAFETY; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SKIN;

DECYL GLUCOSIDE;

ANIMALS; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; COSMETICS; GLUCOSIDES; HUMANS; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; REPRODUCTION; SKIN;

EID: 84901385850     PISSN: 10915818     EISSN: 1092874X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1091581813497764     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Le Coz CJ, Meyer MT. Contact allergy to decyl glucoside in antiseptic after body piercing. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48(5):279–280.
2. Fischer E. Uber die glucoside der alkohole. Berichte. 1893; 26(3):2400–2412.
3. Barel AO, Paye M, Maiback HI, eds. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2009.
4. Gottschalck TE, Bailey JE. International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook. Washington, DC: Personal Care Products Council; 2010.
5. Food and Drug Administration. Frequency of Use of Cosmetic Ingredients. FDA Database. 2011. Washington, DC: FDA; 2011.
6. Personal Care Products Council. Updated Concentration of Use by FDA Product Category: Glucoside ingredients. Unpublished data submitted by Personal Care Products Council on August 16, 2011: 7.
7. Johnsen MA. The influence of particle size. Spray Technol Marketing. 2004; 14(11):24–27.
8. Rothe H. Special Aspects of Cosmetic Spray Evalulation. Unpublished data presented at the 26 September CIR Expert Panel meeting. Washington, DC; September 26, 2011.
9. Rothe H, Fautz R, Gerber E, et al. Special aspects of cosmetic spray safety evaluations: principles on inhalation risk assessment. Toxicol Lett. 2011; 205(2):97–104.
10. Bremmer HJ, LCH Prud’homme de Lodder, Engelen JG. Cosmetics Fact Sheet: To assess the risks for the consumer; Updated version for Cons Expo 4; 2006: 1–77. Report no. RIVM 320104001/2006.
11. European Commission. European Commission Health and Consumers Cosmetics—Cosing—Database. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cosmetics/cosing/. Accessed November 30, 2010.
12. Aungst BJ. Site-dependence and structure–effect relationships for alkylglycosides as transmucosal absorption promoters for insulin. Int J Pharm. 1994; 105(3):219–225.
13. Kobierski S, Ofori-Kwakye K, ller RH, Keck CM. Resveratrol nanosuspensions for dermal application—production, characterization, and physical stability. Pharmazie. 2009; 64(11):741–747.
14. Mishra PR, Al Shaal L, Muller RH, Keck CM. Production and characterization of Hesperetin nanosuspensions for dermal delivery. Int J Pharm. 2009; 37(1-2):182–189.
15. Mueller OT, Rosenberg A. Beta-glucoside hydrolase activity of normal and glucosylceramidotic cultured human skin fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1977; 252(3):825–829.
16. Across Barriers Gmb H. In vitro permeation and penetration of capryl glucoside (inci: caprylyl/capryl glucoside) from the product Plantacare 810 UP in human skin under GLP conditions. GLP Study Report STP 044/00. Science Park 1; 661 23 Saarbruecken; Germany, Across Barriers Gmb H; 2009. Report no. C-10335-244-1 107. Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council.
17. Weber N, Benning H. Metabolism of orally administered alkyl β-glycosides in the mouse. J Nutr. 1984; 114(2):247–254.
18. Mishima T, Katayama Y, Takagi Y, et al. Ethyl alpha-d-glucoside increases urine volume and causes renal morphologic changes in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2005; 51(1):22–26.
19. Tirumalasetty PP, Eley JG. Permeability enhancing effects of the alkylglycoside, octylglucoside, on insulin permeation across epithelial membrane in vitro. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2006; 9(1):32–39.
20. Willing A, Messinger H, Aulmann W. Ecology and toxicologly of alkyl polyglycosides. In: Zoller U, ed. Handbook of Detergents, Part B. Environmental Impact. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 2004: 487–521.
21. Rohm and Haas Company. 2-Week dermal toxicity study in rabbits on Triton CG-110 (60%). Protocol no. 82P-250. Report no. 82R-129. 2-25-1985. NTIS no. OTS0536088.
22. Rohm and Haas Company. Histopathology report of a 2-week repeat dermal toxicity study in rabbits of Triton CG-110 (60%). Protocol no. 82P-250. Report no. 83R-090. 6-20-1983. NTIS no. OTS0536088.
23. Morton D. The use of rabbits in male reproductive toxicology. Environ Health Perspect. 1988; 77: 5–9.
24. Rohm and Haas Company. 2-Week repeat dermal toxicity study in rabbits of Triton CG-110 (60%). Protocol no. 85P-144. Report no. 85R-091. 2-19-1986. NTIS no. OTS0536088.
25. Rohm and Haas Company. Histopathology report of a 2-week repeat dermal toxicity study in rabbits of Triton CG-110 (60%). Protocol no. 85P-144. Histopathology report no. 85R-163. 11-22-1985. NTIS no. OTS0536088.
26. Rohm and Haas Company. 2-Week repeat dermal toxicity study in male rabbits of Triton-CG-110 (60%). Protocol no. 83P-533. Report no. 84R-001. 4-25-1985. NTIS no. OTS0536088.
27. Messinger H, Aulmann W, Kleber M, Koehl W. Investigations on the effects of alkyl polyglucosides on development and fertility. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007; 45(8):1375–1382.
28. Andersen KE, Goossens A. Decyl glucoside contact allergy from a sunscreen product. Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 54(6):349–350.
29. Andrade P, Goncalo M, Figueiredo A. Allergic contact dermatitis to decyl glucoside in Tinosorb M. Contact Dermatitis. 2010; 62(2):119–120.
30. Blondeel A. Contact allery to the mild surfactant decylglucoside. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 49(6):304–305.
31. Horn HM, Murray C, Aldridge RD. Contact allergy to decyl glucoside. Contact Dermatitis. 2005; 52(4):227.
32. Krehic M, Avenel-Audran M. Allergic contact dermatitis from decyl glucoside in an antiseptic lotion. Contact Dermatitis. 2009; 61(6):349–350.
33. Cognis. Data profile on Plantacare 2000 UP (decyl glucoside). Submitted by the Counicl on December 14, 2010:2. Available from CIR.
34. Pharmachem. Technical data sheet on alkyl polyglucoside surfactants; 2011. http://www.pharmachem.co.nz/uploads/82934/files/175457/TDS_APG_s.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2011.
35. ACD/Labs. Advanced Chemistry Development (ACD/Labs) Software; 1994-2010 (C).
36. Joshi VY, Sawant MR. A convenient stereoselective synthesis of β-d-glucopyranosides. Indian J Chem B. 2006; 45B(2):461–465.
37. Cognis. Data sheet for Plantacare® 2000 UP; 2011. http://www.bsibusiness.com/uploads/product/pdf/290_pdf.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2011.
38. Takahashi Y, inventor. Alkyl glycosides JP 420117003 B4; 1967.
39. Pigman W, Laffre RO. The Preparation of n-Butyl α-D-Glucoside. J Am Chem Soc. 1951; 73(10): 4994–4995.
40. STN International; 2010.
41. Cognis. Data sheet on Plantacare 810 UP (caprylyl/capryl glucoside). 2010. Submitted by the Council on December 14, 2010:2. Available from CIR.
42. Cognis. Data profile on Plantacare 1200 UP (lauryl glucoside). 2010. Submitted by the Council on December 14, 2010:2. Available from CIR.
43. Cognis. Product data sheet: Plantacare 818 UP. http://www.cospha.ro/dbimg/Plantacare%20818%20UP.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2011.
44. Personal Care Products Council. Updated concentration of use by FDA product category: glucoside ingredients. Unpublished data submitted by the Council on January 28, 2011:5. Available from CIR.
45. Personal Care Products Council. Concentration of use by FDA product category: hexadecyl d-glucoside and octadecyl d-glucoside. Unpublished data submitted by the Council on March 15, 2011:2.
46. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 30% a.i. Report no. 80R-73. 6-19-1980. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
47. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 30% a.i. Report no. 80R-67. 6-19-1980. OTS0538042.
48. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 30% a.i. Report no. 80R-105. 7-10-1980. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
49. Mehling A, Kleber M, Hensen H. Comparative studies on the ocular and dermal irritation potential of surfactants. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007; 45(5):747–758.
50. Corazza M, Lauriola MM, Bianchi A, Zappaterra M, Virgili A. Irritant and sensitizing potential of eight surfactants commonly used in skin cleansers: an evaluation of 105 patients. Dermatitis. 2010; 21(5):262–268.
51. Garcia C, Ball N, Cagen S, et al. Comparative testing for the indentification os skin-sensitizing potentials of nonionic sugar lipid surfactants. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010; 58(2):301–307.
52. AMA Laboratories. 100 Human subject repeat insult patch test skin irritation/sensitization evaluation (occlusive patch) of an indoor tanning preparation containing 0.5% decyl glucoside. AMA Ref no.: MSO2.R1PTC38440. 100.DERM.TRLI. Unpublished data submitted by Personal Care Products Council; 2002.
53. Clinical Research Laboratories, Inc. Repeated insult pathc test of a body self tan mousse containing 0.75% decyl glucoside. CRL study number: CRL120705-9. 2006. Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on August 22, 2011:14.
54. Product Investigations Inc and Product. Determination of the irritating and sensitizing propensities of a liquid foundation (containing 1.8%) decyl glucoside on human skin. Unpublished data submitted by Personal Care Products Council; 2005:13.
55. Consumer Product Testing Company. Repeat insult patch test on decyl glucoside (5% active) and lauryl glucoside (5% active) under numerous trade names. Experiment Refn. no. C-005-93. 3-2-1993. Unpublished data submitted by the Council on December 14, 2010:34. Available from CIR.
56. Consumer Product Testing Company. Repeated insult patch test of coco-glucoside. Experiment Ref. no. C05-0247.01. 2005. Unpublished data submitted by the Council on December 14, 2010:21. Available from CIR.
57. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 30% surfactant; May 6, 1981. Report no. 81R 0046. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
58. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 30% surfactant; May 6, 1981. Report no. 81R 0047. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
59. Rohm and Haas Company. Triton CG-110: rabbit eye irritation tirtration studies. Report no. 81R-131. Protocol no. 80P-439. 4-28-1982. NTIS no. 0538042.
60. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 60% surfactant; April 19, 1983. Report no. 82R 0177. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
61. Rohm and Haas Company. Triton CG-110 (60%): Rabbit eye irritation titration studies; April 19, 1983. Report no. 82P-289. Protocol no. 82R-178. 4-19-1983. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
62. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 70% a.i. Report no. 74-66. 10-8-1974. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
63. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 70% a.i. Report no. 74-67. 10-8-1974. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
64. Rohm and Haas Company. Ocular irritation study on Triton CG-110, 70% a.i. Report no. 74-68. 10-8-1974. NTIS no. OTS0538042.
65. McLain VC. Final report of the addendum to the safety assessment of n-butyl alcohol as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol. 2008; 27(suppl 2):53–69.
66. Elder RL. Final report on the safety assessment of cetearyl alcohol, cetyl alcohol, isostearyl alcohol, myristyl alcohol, and behenyl alcohol. J Am Coll Toxicol. 1988; 7(3):359–413.
67. Burnett CL, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, et al. Amended safety assessment of Cocos nucifera (coconut) oil and related ingredients. Int J Toxicol. 2011; 30(suppl 3):5S–16S.
68. Elder RL ed. Final report on the safety assessment of stearyl alcohol, oleyl alcohol, and octyl dodecanol. J Am Coll Toxicol. 1985; 4(5):1–29.