Special aspects of cosmetic spray safety evaluations: Principles on inhalation risk assessment

Toxicology Letters

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 97-104

  Rothe, H ^a   Fautz, R ^b   Gerber, E ^c   Neumann, L ^d   Rettinger, K ^e   Schuh, W ^f   Gronewold, C ^b  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b KAO GERMANY GMBH   (Germany)

^c BEIERSDORF AG   (Germany)

^d L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

^e IKW   (Germany)

^f HENKEL KGAA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cosmetic sprays; Inhalation; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; COSMETIC; DEODORANT AGENT; IRRITANT AGENT; SOLVENT; VOLATILE AGENT;

AEROSOL; CALCULATION; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; DRUG EXPOSURE; GAS; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INHALATION; LEGAL ASPECT; LUNG ALVEOLUS; LUNG TOXICITY; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SENSITIZATION; STANDARDIZATION;

AEROSOLS; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; COSMETICS; HUMANS; INHALATION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79960697170     PISSN: 03784274     EISSN: 18793169     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.05.1038     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Arts J.H., Mommers C., de Heer C. Dose-response relationships and threshold levels in skin and respiratory allergy. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2006, 36:219-251.
2. BAuA, 2006. Committee on Hazardous Substances (AGS), Technische Regeln für Gefahrstoffe, Arbeitsplatzgrenzwerte TRGS 900 Ausgabe: Januar 2006, zuletzt geändert und ergänzt: GMBl 2010 Nr. 43S, http://www.baua.de/cln_137/de/Themen-von-A-Z/Gefahrstoffe/TRGS/TRGS.html.
3. Blackburn K., Stickney J.A., Carlson-Lynch H.L., McGinnis P.M., Chappel L., Felter S.P. Application of the threshold of toxicological concern approach to ingredients in personal and household care products. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 43:249-259.
4. Boverhof D.R., Billington R., Gollapudi B.B., Hotchkiss J.A., Krieger S.M., Poole A., Wiescinski C.M., Woolhiser M.R. Respiratory sensitization and allergy: current research approaches and needs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 226:1-13.
5. Bremmer, H.J., Pruód homme de Lodder, L.C.H., van Engelen, J.G.M., 2006a. Cosmetics Fact Sheet to assess the risk for the consumer. Updated version for ConsExpo 4. RIVM report 320104001/2006, http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320104001.pdf.
6. Bremmer, H.J., Pruód homme de Lodder, L.C.H., van Engelen, J.G.M., 2006b. General Fact Sheet - Limiting conditions and reliability, ventilation, room size, body surface area. Updated version for ConsExpo 4, RIVM report 320104002/2006, http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320104002.pdf.
7. Carthew P., Griffiths H., Keech S., Hartop P. Safety Assessment for Hair-Spray Resins: risk assessment based on rodent inhalation studies. Inhal. Toxicol. 2002, 14:401-416.
8. Carthew P., Clapp C., Gutsell S. Exposure based waiving: the application of toxicological threshold of concern (TTC) to inhalation exposure for aerosol ingredients in consumer products. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47:1287-1295.
9. Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK commission), 2010. List of MAK and BAT Values 2010: Maximum Concentrations and Biological Tolerance Values at the Workplace. Report 46, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Eds.), Wiley VCH, Weinheim (German language Version: Senatskommission zur Prüfung gesundheitlicher Arbeitsstoffe, Mitteilung 46, MAK_ und BAT-Werte-Liste 2010).
10. Delmaar, J.E., Park, M.V.D.Z., van Engelen, J.G.M., 2005. ConsExpo 4.0 - Consumer Exposure and Uptake Models - Program Manual, http://www.rivm.nl/en/healthanddisease/productsafety/Main.jsp.
11. Derelanko M.J. Toxicologist's Pocket Handbook, Section 14: Glossary 2000, CRC Press LLC, pp. 201-231.
12. Derelanko M.J. Toxicologist's Pocket Handbook, Section 5: Inhalation Toxicology 2000, CRC Press LLC, pp. 51-60.
13. Drew R., Fraggos J. The concentration of no toxicological concern (CoNTC): a risk assessment screening tool for air toxics. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2007, 70:1584-1593.
14. Eickmann, U., 2007a. "Methoden der Ermittlung und Bewertung chemischer Expositionen an Arbeitsplätzen", ecomed MEDIZIN.
15. Eickmann U., Eickmann J., Tischer M. Exposure to sprays - comparison of the available exposure models. Gefahrstoffe - Reinhaltung der Luft 2007, 67(7/8):305-318.
16. Escher S.E., Tluczkiewicz I., Batke M., Bitsch A., Melber C., Kroese E.D., Buist H.E., Mangelsdorf I. Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58:259-274.
17. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2008. Guidance for the Implementation of REACH, Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health, http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r8_en.pdf%3Fvers=20_08_08.
18. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2010. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment; Chapter R.15: Consumer exposure estimation, (consulted May 2011). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r15_en.pdf%3Fvers=20_08_08.
19. European Parliament and Council, 2008. Regulation 1272/2008/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on Classification, Labeling and Packaging of substances and mixtures) in its most recent version, currently Commission Regulation (EU) No. 286/2011 of 10 March 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/documents/classification/%23h2-5.
20. European Commission, 1976. Council Directive of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to cosmetic products (76/768/EEC), OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p 169, in its most recent version (currently 04.01.2010). Will in future be replaced subsequently by Regulation 1223/2009/.
21. European Parliament and Council, 2009. Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 of the European. Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products (recast) - text of importance for the EEA (Official Journal of the European Union L 342/59, 22 December 2009), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do%3Furi=OJ%3AL%3A%202009%3A342%3A0059%3A0209%3AEN%3APDF.
22. European Commission, 1996. Technical Guidance Documents In Support Of The Commission Directive 93/67/EEC On Risk Assessment For New Notified Substances and the Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 On Risk Assessment For Existing Substances.
23. FEA European Aerosol Federation, 2009. Guide on Particle Size Measurement from Aerosol Products, Summary Paper, August 2009, http://www.aerosol.org/.
24. Federal Office of Public Health, Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 2009. Recommendations on waterproofing aerosols in order to minimize consumer inhalation toxicity risks, SÖFW-J., 3-2009 135, 39-43.
25. Finley B., Proctor D., Scott P., Harrington N., Paustenbach D., Price P. Recommended distributions for exposure factors frequently used in health risk assessment. Risk Anal. 1994, 14:533-553.
26. Greim H., Borm P., Schins R., Donaldson K., Driscoll K., Hartwig A., Kuempel E., Oberdörster G., Speit G. Toxicity of fibers and particles. Report of the workshop held in Munich, Germany. Inhal. Toxicol. 2001, 13:737-754.
27. Hall B., Tozer S., Safford B., Coroama M., Steiling W., Leneveu-Duchemin M.C., McNamara C., Gibney M. European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45:2097-2108.
28. Hall B., Steiling W., Safford B., Coroama M., Tozer S., Firmani C., McNamara C., Gibney M. European consumer exposure to cosmetic products: a framework for conducting population exposure assessments part 2. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49:407-421.
29. Heyder J., Gebhart J., Rudolf G., Schiller C.F., Stahlhofen W. Deposition of particles in the human respiratory tract in the size range 0.005-15μm. J. Aerosol. Sci. 1986, 17:811-825.
30. ILSI Risk Science Institute The relevance of the rat lung response to particle overload for human risk assessment: a Workshop consensus report, ILSI Risk Science Institute Workshop Participants. Inhal. Toxicol. 2000, 12:1-17.
31. Koch, W., Berger-Preiß, E., Boehncke, A., 2004. Arbeitsplatzbelastungen bei der Verwendung von Biozid-Produkten - Teil 1: Inhalative und dermale Expositionsdaten für das Versprühen von flüssigen Biozid-Produkten. Forschungsbericht. Bundesamt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund, http://www.baua.de/de/Publikationen/Fachbeitraege/Gd35.pdf%3F__blob=publicationFile%26v=8.
32. Kroes R., Renwick A.G., Feron V., Galli C.L., Gibney M., Greim H., Guy R.H., Lhuguenot J.C., van de Sandt J.J. Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45:2533-2562.
33. Loretz L., Api A.M., Barraj L., Burdick J., Davis de A., Dressler W., Gilberti E., Jarrett G., Mann S., Laurie Pan Y.H., Re T., Renskers K., Scrafford C., Vater S. Exposure data for personal care products: hairspray, spray perfume, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash, and solid antiperspirant. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44:2008-2018.
34. Mauderly J.L. Relevance of particle-induced rat lung tumors for assessing lung carcinogenic hazard and human lung cancer risk. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997, 105(Suppl. 5):1337-1346.
35. Mildau G., Burkhard A., Daphi-Weber J., Große-Damhues J., Jung J., Schuster B., Walther C. Basic requirements for safety assessments of cosmetic products. SÖFW-J. 2007, 133:16-22.
36. Mildau G., Huber B. The new EC Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 - contents and first explanations. SÖFW-J. 2010, 136:40-59.
37. Muhle H., Mangelsdorf I. Inhalation toxicity of mineral particles: critical appraisal of endpoints and study design. Toxicol. Lett. 2003, 11:223-228.
38. Oberdörster G. Toxicokinetics and effects of fibrous and nonfibrous particles. Inhal. Toxicol. 2002, 14:29-56.
39. Pauluhn J. Comparative pulmonary response to inhaled nanostructures: considerations on test design and endpoints. Inhal. Toxicol. 2009, 21:40-54.
40. Pauluhn J., Mohr U. Experimental approaches to evaluate respiratory allergy in animal models. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2005, 56:203-234.
41. Phalen R.F., Oldham M.J. Aerosol dosimetry considerations. Clin. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 5:773-784.
42. Rijnkels J.M., Smid T., Van den Aker E.C., Burdorf A., van Wijk R.G., Heederik D.J., Houben G.F., Van Loveren H., Pal T.M., Van Rooy F.G., Van der Zee J.S. Health Council of the Netherlands Prevention of work-related airway allergies; summary of the advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands. Allergy 2008, 63:1593-1596.
43. Rossow U., Althoff B., Auderset P., Bernhardt P., Drechsel P., Granzow S., Klenk A., Linner-Kremar B., Matthies W., Meyer T., Mord A., Stiehm T., Tannert U., Weber-Mußmann A. DGK-Vorschlag zu Kernelementen einer Sicherheitsbewertung. SÖFW-J. 2005, 131:41-50.
44. SCCS/1347/10, 2010. Opinion on Dihydroxyacetone, adopted at 9th plenary meeting on 14 December, 2010, http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_048.pdf.
45. SCCS, 2010. The SCCS's Notes of Guidance for the testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 7th Revision, 14 December 2010, http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_004.pdf.
46. U.S. Department of Labor, 2006. MSHA Handbook Series. Mine Safety and Health Administration. Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health Chapter 5: mineral dusts - gravimetric method, October 2006, Handbook Number PH06-IV-1(1).
47. U.S. EPA, 1997. Exposure Factors Handbook (Final Report) 1997, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/P-95/002F a-c.
48. Vernez D., Bruzzi R., Kupferschmidt H., De-Batz A., Droz P., Lazo R. Acute respiratory syndrome after inhalation of waterproofing sprays: a posteriori exposure-response assessment in 102 cases. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2006, 3:250-261.
49. Vielhaber, U., 1991. Flüssigkeits-Aerosole: Tröpfchenanalyse in Anhängigkeit von Zeit und Raum. Aerosol Report, 30, No. 6/91.