Eye-Movements and Interactive Graphics

The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 555-571

  O'Sullivan, Carol ^a   Dingliana, John ^a   Howlett, Sarah ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901327828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50030-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Andrews T., Coppola D. Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research 1999, 39:2947-2953.
2. Aubert H., Foerster O. Beiträage zur Kentniss des indirekten Sehens (i); Untersuchungen über den Raumsinn der Retina. Albert von Graefes Archiv für Ophthamologie 1857, 3:1-37.
3. Barzel R., Hughes J., Wood D. Plausible motion simulation for computer graphics animation. Computer Animation and Simulation '96 1996, 183-197. Springer, Vienna.
4. Bergen G.V.D. Efficient collision detection of complex deformable models using AABB trees. Journal of Graphics Tools 1997, 2(4):1-13.
5. Carlson D., Hodgins J. Simulation levels of detail for real-time animation. Proceedings Graphics Interface 1997, 1-8. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto.
6. Carrasco M., Frieder K. Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research 1997, 37(1):63-82.
7. Chenney S., Forsyth D. View-dependent culling of dynamic systems in virtual environments. ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 1997, 55-58.
8. Chenney S., Forsyth D. Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems. Proceedings Siggraph 2000 2000, 219-228. ACM Press, New York.
9. Clement J. Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics 1982, 50(1):66-71.
10. DeValois R., DeValois K. Spatial Vision 1988, Oxford University, New York.
11. Dingliana J., O'Sullivan C. Graceful degradation of collision handling in physically based animation. Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics 2000 Proceedings) 2000, 19:239-247. 3.
12. Duchaineau M., Wolinsky M., Sigeti D., Miller M., Aldrich C., Mineev-Weinstein M. Roaming terrain: Real-time optimally adapting meshes. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '97 1997, 81-88. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, New York.
13. Funkhouser T., Séquin C. Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments. Proceedings SIGGRAPH '93 1993, 247-254. ACM Press, New York.
14. Garland M. Quadric-Based Polygonal Surface Simplification. PhD thesis 1999, Tech. Rept. CMU-CS-99-105, Carnegie Mellon University.
15. Gilden D., Profitt D. Understanding collision dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15(2):372-383.
16. Gottschalk S., Lin M., Manocha D. OBB-tree: A hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection. Proceedings of ACM SIG-GRAPH '96 1996, 171-180.
17. Grimes J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science) 1996, Vol. 2:89-110. Oxford University Press, Oxford. K. Akins (Ed.).
18. Henderson J., Hollingworth A. The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science 1999, 5:438-443.
19. Hubbard P. Collision detection for interactive graphics applicatios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1995, 1(3):218-230.
20. Hubbard P. Approximating polyhedra with spheres for time-critical collision detection. ACM Transactions on Graphics 1996, 15(3):179-210.
21. Janott M. Interactive perception of multiresolution meshes. Final year thesis 1999, Computer Science Dept., Trinity College, Dublin.
22. Janott M., O'Sullivan C. Using interactive perception to optimise the visual quality of approximated objects in computer graphics. 10th European Conference on Eye Movements, Book of Abstracts 1999, 110-111. Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
23. L.Loschky, McConkie G. User performance with gaze contingent multiresolutional displays. Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2000, 97-103. ACM Press, New York.
24. Luebke D., Hallen B., Newfield D., Watson B. Perceptually driven simplification using gaze-directed rendering. Technical Report, CS-2000-04 2000, University of Virginia.
25. Michotte A. The Perception of Causality 1963, Basic books, New York.
26. Mirtich B. Timewarp rigid body simulation. Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2000 2000, 193-200. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, New York.
27. Murphy H., Duchowski A. Gaze-contingent level of detail rendering. Proceedings of EuroGraphics 2001 (Short Presentations) 2001, 219-228. Eurographics Association, UK.
28. Ohshima T., Yamamoto H., Tamura H. Gaze-directed adaptive rendering for interacting with virtual space. Proceedings IEEE VRAIS'96 1996, 103-110. Springer, New York.
29. O'Regan J. Thoughts on change blindness. Vision and Attention 2001, 281-302. Springer, New York. L. Harris, M. Jenkin (Eds.).
30. O'Sullivan C., Dingliana J. Collisions and perception. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2001, 20(3).
31. O'Sullivan C., Radach R., Collins S. A model of collision perception for real-time animation. Computer Animation and Simulation '99 1999, 67-76. Springer, Vienna. N. Magnenat-Thalmann, D. Thalmann (Eds.).
32. Profitt D., Gilden D. Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15(2):384-393.
33. Rayner K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1986, 41:211-236.
34. Reddy M. Perceptually modulated level of detail for virtual environments. PhD thesis 1997, University of Edinburgh.
35. Rensink R., O'Regan J., Clark J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition 2000, 7(1):127-146.
36. Rovamo J., Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 1979, 37:495-510.
37. Scholl B., Tremoulet P. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(8):299-309.
38. Shioiri S., Ikeda M. Useful resolution for picture perception as a function of eccentricity. Perception 1989, 18:347-361.
39. Simons D. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition 2000, 7(1/2/3):1-15.
40. Strasburger H., Rentschler I., Harvey L.O. Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition. European Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 6:1583-1588.
41. Triesch J., Sullivan B., Hayhoe M., Ballard D. Saccade contingent updating in virtual reality. ETRA'02, Symposium on Eye-tracking Research and Applications 2002, 95-120. ACM Press, New York.
42. van Diepen P., Wampers M., d'Ydewalle G. Functional division of the visual field: Moving masks and moving windows. Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception 1998, 337-355. Elsevier, Oxford. G. Underwood (Ed.).
43. Watson M. Applications of gaze tracking. Final year thesis 2000, Computer Science Dept., Trinity College, Dublin.
44. Weymouth R. Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. American Journal of Ophthamology 1958, 46:102-113.
45. Yee H., Pattanaik S., Greenberg D. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2001, 20(2):39-65.