User performance with gaze contingent multiresolutional displays

Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 97-103

  Loschky, Lester C ^a   McConkie, George W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bandwidth; Dual resolution displays; Eye movements; Eyetracking; Multiresolutional displays; Peripheral vision; Visual perception; Wavelets

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

MULTIRESOLUTIONAL DISPLAYS;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 0034592680     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/355017.355032     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Antonini, M., Barlaud, M., Mathieu, P. and Daubechies, I. Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, I. 205-220.
2. Aubert, H. and Forster Beitrage zur Kenntnisse der indirecten Sehens. Graefes Archiv fur Ophthalmologie, 3. 1-37.
3. Baldwin, D., Area of interest: Instantaneous field of view vision model, in Image Generation/Display Conference II, (, 1981), 481-496.
4. Banks, M.S., Sekuler, A.B. and Anderson, S.J. Peripheral spatial vision: Limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 8 (11). 1775-1787.
5. Burr, D.C., Morrone, M.C. and Ross, J. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371 (6497). Oct 1994, 511-513.
6. Collyer, S.C., Ricard, G.L., Anderson, M., Westra, D.P. and Perry, R.A. Field of view requirements for carrier landing training (AFHRL-TR-80-10), Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Williams Air Force Base, AZ, 1980.
7. Curcio, C.A. and Allen, K.A. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. Journal of Comparitive Neurology (300). 5-25.
8. Curcio, C.A., Sloan, K.R., Packer, O., Hendrickson, A.E. and al., e. Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: Individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science, 236 (4801). 579-582.
9. Lund, R.M., Technology: An operational requirements case study - The Harrier GR MK5/7 Mission Simulator Visual Display System. in Flight Simulation Technology, capabilities and benefits, (London, United Kingdom, 1995), Royal Aeronautical Society, 20.1-20.8.
10. Matin, E. Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81 (12). Dec 1974, 899-917.
11. McConkie, G.W. and Rayner, K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17 (6). 578-586.
12. Munn, N.L. and Geil, G. A note on peripheral form discrimination. Journal of General Psychology, 5. 78-88.
13. Niu, E.L.-C. Gaze-based video compression using wavelets Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 1995, 76.
14. Reingold, E.M., Stampe, D.M., Loschky, L.C. and McConkie, G.W. Variable-resolution gaze-contingent display applications: An integrative review. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Toronto.
15. Robson, J.G. and Graham, N. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research, 21 (3). 1981, 409-418.
16. Shioiri, S. and Ikeda, M. Useful resolution for picture perception as a function of eccentricity. Perception, 18. 347-361.
17. Thibos, L.N. Acuity Perimetry and the Sampling Theory of Visual Resolution. Optometry & Vision Science, 75 (6). 399-406.
18. Thomas, M. and Geltmacher, H. Combat simulator display development. Information Display, 9. 23-26.
19. Turner, J.A., Evaluation of an eye-slaved area-of-interest display for tactical combat simulation, in The 6th Interservice/Industry Training Equipment Conference and Exhibition, (, 1984), 75-86.
20. van Diepen, P.M.J. and Wampers, M. Scene exploration with Fourier-filtered peripheral information. Perception, 27 (10). 1998, 1141-1151.
21. Virsu, V., Naesaenen, R. and Osmoviita, K. Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4 (8). Aug 1987, 1568-1578.
22. Wampers, M., Diepen, P.M.J.V. and d'Ydewalle, G. The use of coarse and fine peripheral information during scene perception, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium, 1998.
23. Watson, B., Walker, N. and Hodges, L. Effectiveness of peripheral level of detail degradation when used with headmounted displays, Georgia Institute of Technology, Graphics, Visualization & Usability Center., 1995.
24. Watson, B.A., Walker, N., Hodges, L.F. and Worden, A. Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: Effects on search performance with a head-mounted display. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 4 (4). 323-346.