Contribution of Mechanical and Fluid Stresses to the Magnitude of In-stent Restenosis at the Level of Individual Stent Struts

Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 164-175

  Keller, Brandis K ^a   Amatruda, Claudia M ^b   Hose, D Rodney ^b   Gunn, Julian ^b   Lawford, Patricia V ^b   Dubini, Gabriele ^a   Migliavacca, Francesco ^a   Narracott, Andrew J ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Finite element; In stent restenosis; Structural mechanics; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID MECHANICS; STRESSES; STRUTS;

COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; HISTOLOGICAL SECTION; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; LINEAR CORRELATION; OSCILLATORY SHEAR INDEX; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; STRUCTURAL MECHANICS; WALL SHEAR STRESS;

STENTS;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VISCOSITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HISTOLOGY; MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; SIMULATION; STENT; SWINE; WAVE FORM;

EID: 84901323168     PISSN: 1869408X     EISSN: 18694098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13239-014-0181-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bennett, M. R. In-stent stenosis: pathology and implications for the development of drug eluting stents. Heart 89(2): 218-224, 2003.
2. Boyle, C. J., A. B. Lennon, and P. J. Prendergast. Application of a mechanobiological simulation technique to stents used clinically. J. Biomech. 46(5): 918-924, 2013.
3. Boyle, C. J., et al. Computational simulation methodologies for mechanobiological modelling: a cell-centred approach to neointima development in stents. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2010(368): 2919-2935, 1921.
4. Chaabane, C., et al. Biological responses in stented arteries. Cardiovasc. Res. 99(2): 353-363, 2013.
5. Chen, H. Y., et al. Mis-sizing of stent promotes intimal hyperplasia: impact of endothelial shear and intramural stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 301(6): H2254-H2263, 2011.
6. Chiastra, C., et al. Computational fluid dynamics of stented coronary bifurcations studied with a hybrid discretization method. Eur. J. Mech. B 35: 76-84, 2012.
7. Chiu, J-. J., and S. Chien. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol. Rev. 91(1): 327-387, 2011.
8. Chiu, J-. J., et al. A model for studying the effect of shear stress on interactions between vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. J. Biomech. 37(4): 531-539, 2004.
9. Colombo, A., et al. Cyclic strain amplitude dictates the growth response of vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro: role in in-stent restenosis and inhibition with a sirolimus drug-eluting stent. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 212(4): 671-683, 2013.
10. Conway, C., et al. A computational test-bed to assess coronary stent implantation mechanics using a population-specific approach. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 3(4): 374-387, 2012.
11. Duraiswamy, N., et al. Spatial distribution of platelet deposition in stented arterial models under physiologic flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(12): 1767-1777, 2005.
12. Edelman, E. R., and C. Rogers. Pathobiologic responses to stenting. Am. J. Cardiol. 81(7, Supplement 1): 4E-6E, 1998.
13. Gijsen, F. J., et al. Simulation of stent deployment in a realistic human coronary artery. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 7(23): 1-11, 2008.
14. Gogas, B. D., et al. The edge vascular response following implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and the XIENCE V metallic everolimus-eluting stent. First serial follow-up assessment at six months and two years: insights from the first-in-man ABSORB Cohort B and SPIRIT II trials. EuroIntervention 9(6): 709-720, 2013.
15. Gojova, A., and A. I. Barakat. Vascular endothelial wound closure under shear stress: role of membrane fluidity and flow-sensitive ion channels. J. Appl. Physiol. 98(6): 2355-2362, 2005.
16. Gunn, J., et al. Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima. Heart 88(4): 401-405, 2002.
17. Huo, Y., et al. Effects of vessel compliance on flow pattern in porcine epicardial right coronary arterial tree. J. Biomech. 42(5): 594-602, 2009.
18. Kleinstreuer, C., et al. Hemodynamic parameters and early intimal thickening in branching blood vessels. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 29(1): 1-64, 2001.
19. Kleinstreuer, C., et al. Hemodynamic parameters and early intimal thickening in branching blood vessels. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 29(1): 1-64, 2001.
20. Kolandavel, M., et al. The effects of time varying curvature on species transport in coronary arteries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34(12): 1820-1832, 2006.
21. Koskinas, K. C., et al. Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59(15): 1337-1349, 2012.
22. Kroll, M., et al. Platelets and shear stess. Blood 88(5): 1525-1541, 1996.
23. LaDisa, J. F., et al. Stent implantation alters coronary artery hemodynamics and wall shear stress during maximal vasodilation. J. Appl. Physiol. 93(6): 1939-1946, 2002.
24. LaDisa, Jr., J. F., et al. Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288(5): H2465-H2475, 2005.
25. LaDisa, J. F., et al. Alterations in regional vascular geometry produced by theoretical stent implantation influence distributions of wall shear stress: analysis of a curved coronary artery using 3D computational fluid dynamics modeling. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 5(40): 11, 2006.
26. Linder-Ganz, E., et al. Pressure-time cell death threshold for albino rat skeletal muscles as related to pressure sore biomechanics. J. Biomech. 39(14): 2725-2732, 2006.
27. Malek, A. M., S. L. Alper, and S. Izumo. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282(21): 2035-2042, 1999.
28. Malek, A., and S. Izumo. Physiological fluid shear stress causes downregulation of endothelin-1 mRNA in bovine aortic endothelium. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 263(2): C389-C396, 1992.
29. Messenger, J., et al. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients. Int. J. Card. Imaging 16(6): 413-427, 2000.
30. Moazzam, F., et al. The leukocyte response to fluid stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94(10): 5338-5343, 1997.
31. Moore, Jr., J., and J. L. Berry. Fluid and solid mechanical implications of vascular stenting. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30(4): 498-508, 2002.
32. Morlacchi, S., et al. Sequential structural and fluid dynamic numerical simulations of a stented bifurcated coronary artery. J. Biomech. Eng. 133(12): 1-11, 2011.
33. Morlacchi, S., et al. Hemodynamics and in-stent restenosis: micro-CT images, histology, and computer simulations. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39(10): 2615-2626, 2011.
34. Murphy, J., and F. Boyle. Predicting neointimal hyperplasia in stented arteries using time-dependant computational fluid dynamics: a review. Comput. Biol. Med. 40(4): 408-418, 2010.
35. Nichols, W. W., and M. F. O'Rourke. McDonald's blood flow in arteries (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1990.
36. Sanmartín, M., et al. Influence of shear stress on in-stent restenosis: invivo study using 3D reconstruction and computational fluid dynamics. Revista Española de Cardiología 59(1): 20-27, 2006.
37. Selvarasu, N. K. C., and D. K. Tafti. Investigation of the effects of dynamic change in curvature and torsion on pulsatile flow in a helical tube. J. Biomech. Eng. 134(7): 071005-071017, 2012.
38. Seo, T., L. G. Schachter, and A. I. Barakat. Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(4): 444-456, 2005.
39. Sharpe, J., et al. Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296(5567): 541-545, 2002.
40. Stefanini, G. G., and D. R. Holmes, Jr. Drug-eluting coronary-artery stents. N. Engl. J. Med. 368(3): 254-265, 2013.
41. Stettler, C., et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 370(9591): 937-948, 2007.
42. Tahir, H., et al. Multi-scale simulations of the dynamics of in-stent restenosis: impact of stent deployment and design. Interface Focus 1(3): 365-373, 2011.
43. Thury, A., et al. Focal in-stent restenosis near step-up. Circulation 105(23): e185-e187, 2002.
44. Timmins, L. H., et al. Increased artery wall stress post-stenting leads to greater intimal thickening. Lab. Investig. 91(6): 955-967, 2011.
45. Wang, J., and B. Thampatty. An introductory review of cell mechanobiology. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 5(1): 1-16, 2006.