Efficient discovery of responses of proteins to compounds using active learning

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kangas, Joshua D ^a   Naik, Armaghan W ^a   Murphy, Robert F ^a,b,c  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active learning; Computational biology; Drug development; Drug discovery; Machine learning; Polypharmacology

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; DRUG PRODUCTS; EXPERIMENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ACTIVE LEARNING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DRUG DISCOVERY; POLYPHARMACOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; METABOLISM;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; PROTEINS;

EID: 84901302727     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-143     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Patani GA, LaVoie EJ. Bioisosterism: a rational approach in drug design. Chem Rev 1996, 96(8):3147-3176. 10.1021/cr950066q, 11848856.
2. Kearsley SK, Sallamack S, Fluder EM, Andose JD, Mosley RT, Sheridan RP. Chemical similarity using physiochemical property descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1996, 36(1):118-127.
3. Sheridan RP, Miller MD, Underwood DJ, Kearsley SK. Chemical similarity using geometric atom pair descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1996, 36:128-136.
4. Lengauer T, Rarey M. Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr Opin Struc Biol 1996, 6:402-406.
5. Huang S-Y, Zou X. Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking. Intl J Mol Sci 2010, 11:3016-3034.
6. Han L, Wang Y, Bryant SH. Developing and validating predictive decision tree models from mining chemical structural fingerprints and high-throughput screening data in PubChem. BMC Bioinf 2008, 9:401.
7. Li Q, Wang Y, Bryant SH. A novel method for mining highly imbalanced high-throughput screening data in PubChem. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:3310-3316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp589, 2788930, 19825798.
8. Merino A, Bronowska AK, Jackson DB, Cahill DJ. Drug profiling: knowing where it hits. Drug Discov Today 2010, 15(17-18):749-756.
9. Murphy RF. An active role for machine learning in drug development. Nat Chem Biol 2011, 7(6):327-330. 10.1038/nchembio.576, 21587249.
10. Keiser MJ, Setola V, Irwin JJ, Laggner C, Abbas AI, Hufeisen SJ, Jensen NH, Kuijer MB, Matos RC, Tran TB, Whaley R, Glennon RA, Hert J, Thomas KL, Edwards DD, Shoichet BK, Roth BL. Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature 2009, 462(7270):175-181. 10.1038/nature08506, 2784146, 19881490.
11. Besnard J, Ruda GF, Setola V, Abecassis K, Rodriguez RM, Huang X-P, Norval S, Sassano MF, Shin AI, Webster LA, Simeons FR, Stojanovski L, Prat A, Seidah NG, Constam DB, Bickerton GR, Read KD, Wetsel WC, Gilbert IH, Roth BL, Hopkins AL. Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles. Nature 2012, 492:215-220. 10.1038/nature11691, 3653568, 23235874.
12. Oprea TI, Nielsen SK, Ursu O, Yang JJ, Taboureau O, Mathias SL, Kouskoumvekaki L, Sklar LA, Bologa CG. Associating drugs, targets and clinical outcomes into an integrated network affords a New platform for computer-aided drug repurposing. Mol Inform 2011, 30(2-3):100-111. 3266123, 22287994.
13. Chen YZ, Zhi DG. Ligand-protein inverse docking and its potential use in the computer search of protein targets of a small molecule. Proteins 2001, 43(2):217-226. 10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:2<217::AID-PROT1032>3.0.CO;2-G, 11276090.
14. Caschera F, Gazzola G, Bedau MA, Bosch Moreno C, Buchanan A, Cawse J, Packard N, Hanczyc MM. Automated discovery of novel drug formulations using predictive iterated high throughput experimentation. PLoS One 2010, 5(1):e8546. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008546, 2797296, 20049327.
15. Tong S, Koller D. Active Learning for Structure in Bayesian Networks. Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Seattle, Washington 2001, 863-869.
16. Pournara I, Wernisch L. Reconstruction of gene networks using Bayesian learning and manipulation experiments. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):2934-2942. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth337, 15180938.
17. Liu Y. Active learning with support vector machine applied to gene expression data for cancer classification. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004, 44(6):1936-1941. 10.1021/ci049810a, 15554662.
18. King RD, Whelan KE, Jones FM, Reiser PG, Bryant CH, Muggleton SH, Kell DB, Oliver SG. Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature 2004, 427(6971):247-252. 10.1038/nature02236, 14724639.
19. Stegle O, Payet L, Mergny J-L, MacKay DJC, Huppert JL. Predicting and understanding the stability of G-quadruplexes. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:i374-i382. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp210, 2687964, 19478012.
20. Danziger SA, Baronio R, Ho L, Hall L, Salmon K, Hatfield GW, Kaiser P, Lathrop RH. Predicting positive p53 cancer rescue regions using Most Informative Positive (MIP) active learning. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5(9):e1000498. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000498, 2742196, 19756158.
21. Mohamed TP, Carbonell JG, Ganapathiraju MK. Active learning for human protein-protein interaction prediction. BMC Bioinf 2010, 11(Suppl 1):S57.
22. Warmuth MK, Liao J, Ratsch G, Mathieson M, Putta S, Lemmen C. Active learning with support vector machines in the drug discovery process. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43(2):667-673. 10.1021/ci025620t, 12653536.
23. Fujiwara Y, Yamashita Y, Osoda T, Asogawa M, Fukushima C, Asao M, Shimadzu H, Nakao K, Shimizu R. Virtual screening system for finding structurally diverse hits by active learning. J Chem Inf Model 2008, 48(4):930-940. 10.1021/ci700085q, 18351729.
24. Tibshirani R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 1996, 58(1):267-288.
25. Fujii A, Inui K, Tokunaga T, Tanaka H. Selective sampling for example-based word sense disambiguation. Comput Linguist 1998, 24(4):573-597.
26. Naik AW, Kangas JD, Langmead CJ, Murphy RF. Efficient modeling and active learning discovery of biological responses. PLoS One 2013, 8(12):e83996. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083996, 3866149, 24358322.
27. MacKay DJC. Information-based objective functions for active data. Neural Comput 1992, 4(4):590-604.
28. Settles B, Craven M. An Analysis of Active Learning Strategies for Sequence Labeling Tasks 2008, 1070-1079. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '08).
29. Bolton EE, Wang Y, Thiessen PA, Bryant SH. PubChem: integrated platform of small molecules and biological activities. Annu Rep Comput Chem 2008, 4:217-241.
30. Wilkins MR, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Sanchez J-C, Williams KL, Appel RD, Hochstrasser DF. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Meth Mol Biol 1999, 112:531-552.
31. de Castro E, Sigrist CJA, Gattiker A, Bulliard V, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Hulo N. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucl Acids Res 2006, 34(suppl 2):W362-W365. 1538847, 16845026.
32. Guha R, Howard MT, Hutchison GR, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa H, Steinbeck C, Wegner JK, Willighagen EL. The blue obelisk-interoperability in chemical informatics. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:991-998. 10.1021/ci050400b, 16711717.
33. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibrshriani R. Least angle regression. Ann Stat 2004, 32(9):407-499.