Comparison of strategies to overcome the inhibitory effects in high-gravity fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 65, Issue , 2014, Pages 79-90

  Xiros, Charilaos ^a   Olsson, Lisbeth ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Detoxification; Lignocellulosic inhibitors; Nutrient supplementation; Softwood

Indexed keywords

BIOETHANOL; DETOXIFICATION; DISTILLATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; SOFTWOODS; SUGARS; YEAST;

ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; IMPROVEMENT METHODS; INHIBITORY EFFECT; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; SEPARATE HYDROLYSIS AND FERMENTATION; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; TEMPERATURE INCREASE; VOLUMETRIC PRODUCTIVITY;

NUTRIENTS;

BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DETOXIFICATION; DISTILLATION; DRY MATTER; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITOR; LIGNIN; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TOXICITY; WOOD; YEAST; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION; GRAVITY FIELD; NUTRITIONAL STATUS;

PICEA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84901279954     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.060     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Koppram R., Tomas-Pejo E., Xiros C., Olsson L. Lignocellulosic ethanol production at high-gravity: challenges and perspectives. Trends Biotechnol 2014, 32(1):46-53.
2. Galbe M., Sassner P., Wingren A., Zacchi G. Process engineering economics of bioethanol production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2007, 108:303-327.
3. Almeida J.R.M., Modig T., Petersson A., Hahn-Hagerdal B., Liden G., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2007, 82(4):340-349.
4. Ding M.Z., Wang X., Yang Y., Yuan Y.J. Metabolomic study of interactive effects of phenol, furfural, and acetic acid on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Omics 2011, 15(10):647-653.
5. Wallace-Salinas V., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F. Adaptive evolution of an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for combined tolerance to inhibitors and temperature. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6.
6. Jonsson L.J., Alriksson B., Nilvebrant N.O. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6.
7. Stenberg K., Tengborg C., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Optimisation of steam pretreatment of SO2-impregnated mixed softwoods for ethanol production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 1998, 71(4):299-308.
8. Pienkos P.T., Zhang M. Role of pretreatment and conditioning processes on toxicity of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. Cellulose 2009, 16(4):743-762.
9. Koppram R., Albers E., Olsson L. Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5.
10. Jorgensen H. Effect of nutrients on fermentation of pretreated wheat straw at very high dry matter content by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009, 153(1-2):44-57.
11. Tomas-Pejo E., Negro M.J., Saez F., Ballesteros M. Effect of nutrient addition on preinoculum growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for application in SSF processes. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 45:168-174.
12. Alvira P., Tomas-Pejo E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101(13):4851-4861.
13. Alriksson B., Cavka A., Jonsson L.J. Improving the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolysates of lignocellulose through chemical in-situ detoxification with reducing agents. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102(2):1254-1263.
14. Lan T.Q., Gleisner R., Zhu J.Y., Dien B.S., Hector R.E. High titer ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine by simultaneous enzymatic saccharification and combined fermentation. Bioresour Technol 2013, 127:291-297.
15. Alvira P., Moreno A.D., Ibarra D., Saez F., Ballesteros M. Improving the fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by laccase during ethanol production from steam-exploded wheat straw at high-substrate loadings. Biotechnol Prog 2013, 29(1):74-82.
16. Yang X.S., Zhang S.J., Zuo Z., Men X., Tian S. Ethanol production from the enzymatic hydrolysis of non-detoxified steam-exploded corn stalk. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102(17):7840-7844.
17. Larsson S., Reimann A., Nilvebrant N.O., Jonsson L.J. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1999, 77-9:91-103.
18. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D., et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass 2010;Jul, Gold Colo Natl Renew Energy Laboratory, p. 17, Report No.TP-510-42618.
19. Verduyn C., Postma E., Scheffers W.A., Van Dijken J.P. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 1992, 8(7):501-517.
20. Wood T.M., Bhat K.M. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Meth Enzymol 1988, 160:87-112.
21. Boyle D. Nutritional factors limiting the growth of Lentinula edodes and other white-rot fungi in wood. Soil Biol Biochem 1998, 30(6):817-823.
22. Olsson L., HahnHagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb Technol 1996, 18(5):312-331.
23. Xiros C., Christakopoulos P. Biotechnological potential of brewers spent grain and its recent applications. Waste Biomass Valorization 2012, 3(2):213-232.
24. Brandberg T., Karimi K., Taherzadeh M.J., Franzen C.J., Grustafsson L. Continuous fermentation of wheat-supplemented lignocellulose hydrolysate with different types of cell retention. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 98(1):80-90.
25. Albers E., Larsson C., Lidén G., Niklasson C., Gustafsson L. Influence of the nitrogen source on Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaerobic growth and product formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996, 62(9):3187-3195.
26. Ylitervo P., Franzen C.J., Taherzadeh M.J. Impact of furfural on Rapid ethanol production using a membrane Bioreactor. Energies 2013, 6(3):1604-1617.
27. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74(1):17-24.
28. Jones A.M., Ingledew W.M. Fuel alcohol production - appraisal of nitrogenous yeast foods for very high gravity wheat mash fermentation. Process Biochem 1994, 29(6):483-488.
29. Brehmer B., Bals B., Sanders J., Dale B. Improving the corn-ethanol industry: studying protein separation techniques to obtain higher value-added product options for distillers grains. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 101(1):49-61.
30. Cavka A., Alriksson B., Ahnlund M., Jonsson L.J. Effect of sulfur oxyanions on lignocellulose-derived fermentation inhibitors. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108(11):2592-2599.
31. Alkasrawi M., Rudolf A., Liden G., Zacchi G. Influence of strain and cultivation procedure on the performance of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam pretreated spruce. Enzyme Microb Technol 2006, 38(1-2):279-286.
32. Parawira W., Tekere M. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2011, 31(1):20-31.
33. Soderstrom J., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Effect of washing on yield in one- and two-step steam pretreatment of softwood for production of ethanol. Biotechnol Prog 2004, 20(3):744-749.
34. Tengborg C., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 2001, 28(9-10):835-844.
35. Jorgensen H., Vibe-Pedersen J., Larsen J., Felby C. Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 96(5):862-870.
36. Larsen J., Petersen M.O., Thirup L., Li H.W., Iversen F.K. The IBUS process - lignocellulosic bioethanol close to a commercial reality. Chem Eng Technol 2008, 31(5):765-772.
37. Sun Y., Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 2002, 83(1):1-11.
38. Graves T., Narendranath N.V., Dawson K., Power R. Interaction effects of lactic acid and acetic acid at different temperatures on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 73(5):1190-1196.
39. Graves T., Narendranath N., Power R. Development of a "Stress Model" fermentation system for fuel ethanol yeast strains. J I Brew 2007, 113(3):263-271.
40. Steels E.L., Learmonth R.P., Watson K. Stress tolerance and membrane lipid unsaturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown aerobically or anaerobically. Microbiology 1994, 140(Pt 3):569-576.
41. Soudham V.P., Alriksson B., Jonsson L.J. Reducing agents improve enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates in the presence of pretreatment liquid. J Biotechnol 2011, 155(2):244-250.
42. Andric P., Meyer A.S., Jensen P.A., Dam-Johansen K. Effect and modeling of glucose inhibition and in situ glucose removal during enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2010, 160(1):280-297.
43. Xiros C., Katapodis P., Christakopoulos P. Evaluation of Fusarium oxysporum cellulolytic system for an efficient hydrolysis of hydrothermally treated wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100(21):5362-5365.
44. Olofsson K., Bertilsson M., Liden G. A short review on SSF- an interesting process option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Biotechnol Biofuels 2008, 1(1):7.
45. Lallemand. Thermosacc® Dry: High performance active yeast. http://www.lallemandbds.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2013_LBDS_Data-Sheet_Thermosacc-Dry_10080_Data_Rev.00.01.01.2013.pdf [accessed 19.03.14].