What makes a youth-produced film good? The youth audience perspective

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 386-403

  Halverson, Erica Rosenfeld ^a   Gibbons, Damiana ^b   Copeland, Shelby ^a   Andrews, Alon ^a   Llorens, Belen Hernando ^a   Bass, Michelle B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescents; audience; evaluation; quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901258838     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2012.706222     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bass, M.B. 2008. Balancing credibility and reportability in youth produced documentaries. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of English Assembly for Research, UCLA, February 15-17, 2008, Bloomington, IN
2. Bass, M.B. 2009. Examining identity representations: An analysis of youth produced films focused on identity. Unpublished Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison
3. Bourdieu, P. 1979. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of pure taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Buckingham, D., P. Fraser, and J. Sefton-Green 2000. Evaluating student production in media studies. In Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people, ed. J. Sefton-Green, G.R. Sinker, 129-53.London: Routledge.
5. Buttram, J. 1990. Focus groups: A starting point for needs assessment. Evaluation Practice, 11, no. 3: 207-12. doi: 10.1016/0886-1633(90)90025-9
6. Cachia, R., A. Ferrari, K. Ala-Mutka, and Y. Punie. 2010. Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in EU Member States. The Institute for Prospective Technologies (IPTS) in collaboration with DG Education and Culture. European Commission. http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=3900
7. Chi, M.T. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, no. 3: 271-315. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
8. Eisner, E. 1985. The art of educational evaluation. Brighton: The Falmer Press
9. Fiske, E.B. 1999. Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning, Chicago: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
10. Fleming, M. 2010. Arts in education and creativity: A literature review. 2nd ed. UK: Arts Council England. http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/research-impact/exploreresearch/arts-in-education-and-creativity-a-literature-review,59,RAR.html (accessed July 1, 2011)
11. Goodman, S. 2003. Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production, & social change, New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Halverson, E.R. 2008. From one woman to everyman: The reportability paradox in publicly performed narratives. Narrative Inquiry 18, no. 1: 29-52
13. Halverson, E.R. 2010. Film as identity exploration: A multimodal analysis of youth-produced films. Teachers College Record 112, no. 9: 2352-78
14. Halverson, E.R., M. Bass, and D. Woods. 2012. The process of creation: A novel methodology for analyzing multimodal data. The Qualitative Report 17, no. 2: 430-56
15. Halverson, E.R., and D. Gibbons. 2010. "Key moments" as pedagogical windows into the digital video production process. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 26, no. 2: 69-74
16. Heath, S.B. 2000. Seeing our way into learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, no. 1: 121-32. doi: 10.1080/03057640050005816
17. Heath, S.B. 2004. Risks, rules, and roles: Youth perspectives on the work of learning for community development. In Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth, ed. A. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, and B. Burge, 41-70.New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ito, M., H. Horst, M. Bittani, D. Boyd, B. Herr-Stephenson, P.G. Lange, C.J. Pascoe, and L. Robinson. 2008. Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning, MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL
19. Lange, P.G., and M. Ito 2010. Creative production. In Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media, ed. M. Ito, S. Baumer, M. Bittanti, d. boyd, R. Cody, B. Herr-Stephenson, and H.A. Horst, 243-93.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Magnifico, A. 2010. Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer's audience. Educational Psychologist, 45, no. 3: 167-84. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.493470
21. McCloskey, M. 1983. Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 210, 1139-41.
22. McLaughlin, M.W., M.A. Irby, and J. Langman 1994. Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Nelson, M.E., G. Hull, and J. Roche-Smith 2008. Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25, no. 4: 415-40. doi: 10.1177/0741088308322552
24. Purcell-Gates, V., N.K. Duke, and J.A. Martineau 2007. Learning to read and write in genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, no. 1: 8-45. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1
25. Saldaña, J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Sefton-Green, J. 2000. From creativity to cultural production: Shared perspectives. In Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people, ed. J. Sefton-Green, and R. Sinker, 216-31.London: Routledge.
27. Sefton-Green, J., and R. Sinker 2000. Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people, London: Routledge.
28. Sheridan, K. 2008. Reading, writing and watching: The informal education of film fans. In Handbook on teaching literacy through the communicative, visual and performing arts, ed. J. Flood, D. Lapp, S.B. Heath. 2nd ed., 259-70.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Soep, E. 2006. Critique: Assessment and the production of learning. Teachers College Record, 108, no. 4: 748-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00667.x
30. Stewart, D.W., P.N. Shamdasani, and D.W. Rook 2007. Focus groups, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Wiley, L., and D. Feiner 2001. Making a scene: Representational authority and a community-centered process of script development. In Performing democracy: International perspectives on urban community-based performance, ed. S.C. Haedicke, and T. Nellhaus, 121-42.Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.