Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 680-703

  Féry, Caroline ^a   Kügler, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54149117994     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Barker, G. (2002). Intonation patterns in Tyrolean German: An autosegmental-metrical analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
2. Bartels, C., & Kingston, J. (1994). Salient pitch cues in the perception of contrastive focus. In P. Bosch, R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus and natural language processing, Vol. 1, Intonation and syntax (pp. 11-28). IBM Working Papers of the Institute for Logic and Linguistics.
3. Baumann S. The intonation of givenness (2006), Niemeyer, Tübingen
4. Baumann, S., Grice, M., & Steindamm, S. (2006). Prosodic marking of focus domains-Categorical or gradient? In Proceedings of speech prosody 2006 (pp. 301-304). Dresden: TVD Press.
5. Beaver D., Clark B.Z., Flemming E., Jaeger T.F., and Wolters M. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus. Language 83 (2007) 245-276
6. Beckman M.E., and Pierrehumbert J.B. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3 (1986) 255-309
7. van den Berg R., Gussenhoven C., and Rietveld T. Downstep in Dutch: Implications for a model. In: Docherty G., and Ladd D.R. (Eds). Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 335-367
8. Bierwisch M. Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. Studia Grammatica 7 (1966) 99-201
9. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2006). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.20) [Computer program]. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from 〈http://www.praat.org/〉.
10. Brown G., Currie K., and Kenworthy J. Questions of intonation (1980), Croom Helm, London
11. Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish word accent in sentence perspective. Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund 12, Gleerup, Lund.
12. Büring D. What do definites do that indefinites definitely don't?. In: Féry C., and Sternefeld W. (Eds). Audiatur vox sapientiae. A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (2001), Akademie Verlag, Berlin 70-100
13. Cinque G. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24 (1993) 239-297
14. Clements G.N. The status of register in intonation theory: Comments on the papers by Ladd and by Inkelas and Leben. In: Kingston J., and Beckman M. (Eds). Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and the physics of speech (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 58-71
15. Connell B., and Ladd D.R. Aspects of pitch realization in Yoruba. Phonology 7 (1990) 1-30
16. Cooper W.E., Eady S.J., and Mueller P.R. Acoustical aspects of contrastiveness in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77 (1985) 2142-2156
17. Cruttenden A. The de-accenting of given information: A cognitive universal?. In: Bernini G., and Schwartz M.L. (Eds). Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe (2006), de Gruyter, Berlin, New York 311-356
18. Eady S.J., and Cooper W.E. Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80 (1986) 402-415
19. Eady S.J., Cooper W.E., Klouda G.V., Mueller P.R., and Lotts D.W. Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: Narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments. Language and Speech 29 (1986) 233-251
20. von Essen O. Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation (1956), Henn, Ratingen
21. Féry C. German intonational patterns (1993), Niemeyer, Tübingen
22. In: Féry C., Fanselow G., and Krifka M. (Eds). The notions of information structure. ISIS 6 (2006), University of Potsdam
23. Féry C., and Ishihara S. Interpreting second occurrence focus (2005), Ms. Potsdam
24. Féry, C., & Ishihara, S. (to appear). How focus and givenness shapes prosody. In M. Zimmermann, C. Féry (Eds.), Information structure from different perspectives. OUP.
25. Féry C., and Samek-Lodovici V. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82 (2006) 131-150
26. Féry C., and Truckenbrodt H. Sisterhood and tonal scaling. Studia Linguistica 59 (2005) 223-243 (Special issue "Boundaries in Intonational Phonology")
27. Fuchs A. 'Normaler' und 'kontrastiver' Akzent. Lingua 38 (1976) 293-312
28. Gandour J., Potisuk S., and Dechongkit S. Tonal coarticulation in Thai. Journal of Phonetics 22 (1994) 477-492
29. Gilles P. Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen. Variabilität in der Intonation von Abschluss und Weiterweisung (2005), de Gruyter, Berlin, New York
30. Grabe, E. (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Nijmegen.
31. Grice M., Baumann S., and Benzmüller R. German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In: Jun S. (Ed). Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 55-83
32. Grønnum N. The groundwork of Danish intonation (1992), Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen
33. Gussenhoven C. Sentence accents and argument structure. In: Roca I. (Ed). Thematic structure. Its role in grammar (1992), Foris, Dordrecht 79-106
34. Gussenhoven C. The phonology of tone and intonation (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Jacobs, J. (1993). Integration. In M. Reis (Ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur (Linguistische Arbeiten 306). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
36. In: Jun S.-A. (Ed). Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Katz J., and Selkirk E. Two types of focus, two types of prominence. Ms (2005), University of Massachusetts, Amherst
38. Kubozono H. Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese. Phonology 6 (1989) 39-67
39. Kügler F. The intonational phonology of Swabian and Upper Saxon (Linguistische Arbeiten 515) (2007), Niemeyer, Tübingen
40. Kügler F. The role of duration as a phonetic correlate of focus. In: Barbosa P.A., Madureira S., and Reis C. (Eds). Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference (2008), Editora RG/CNPq, Campinas, Brazil 591-594
41. Kügler, F., Féry, C., & van de Vijver, R. (2003). Pitch accent realization in German. In Proceedings of the 15th ICPhS, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 1261-1264).
42. Ladd D.R. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English (1980), Indiana University Press, Bloomington
43. Ladd D.R. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language 59 (1983) 721-759
44. Ladd D.R. Metrical representation of pitch register. In: Kingston J., and Beckman M. (Eds). Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and the physics of speech (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 35-57
45. Ladd D.R. Intonational phonology (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
46. Laniran Y.O., and Clements G.N. Downstep and high raising: Interacting factors in Yoruba tone production. Journal of Phonetics 31 (2003) 203-250
47. Lenerz J. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen (1977), Narr, Tübingen
48. Liberman M., and Pierrehumbert J. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In: Aronoff M., and Oehrle R.T. (Eds). Language, sound, structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students (1984), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 157-223
49. Maeda, S. (1976). A characterization of American English intonation. PhD thesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Mayer, J. (1997). Intonation und Bedeutung. Doctoral dissertation, Arbeitspiere des IMS, Universität Stuttgart.
51. Menn L., and Boyce S. Fundamental frequency and discourse structure. Language and Speech 25 (1982) 341-383
52. Peters J. Intonation deutscher Regionalsprachen (2006), de Gruyter, Berlin, New York
53. Pheby J. Phonologie: Intonation. In: Heidolph K.E., Flämig W., Motsch W., et al. (Eds). Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik (1980), Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 839-897
54. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Prieto P., D'Imperio M., Elordieta G., Frota S., and Vigário M. Evidence for soft preplanning in tonal production: Initial scaling in Romance. In: Hoffmann R., and Mixdorff H. (Eds). Proceedings of speech prosody 2006 (2006), TUD Press, Dresden 803-806
56. Prieto P., Shih C., and Nibert H. Pitch downtrends in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 24 (1996) 445-473
57. Rialland A., and Somé P.A. Dagara downstep: How speakers get started. In: Carstens V., and Parkinson F. (Eds). Advances in African linguistics. Trends in African linguistics Vol. 4 (2000), Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ 251-263
58. Rooth, M. (1985). Associations with focus. PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
59. Rooth M. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1 (1992) 75-116
60. Schwarzschild R. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7 (1999) 141-177
61. Selkirk E. The prosodic phrasing of FOCUS followed by focus: The case of English. In: Gussenhoven C., and Riad T. (Eds). Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody (2006), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
62. von Stechow A., and Uhmann S. On the focus-pitch accent relation. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 25 (1984) 228-263
63. Stewart J.M. Dschang and Ebrié as Akan-type total downstep languages. In: van der Hulst H., and Snider K. (Eds). The phonology of tone: The representation of tonal register (1993), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 185-244
64. Thorsen N. Intonation and text in standard Danish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77 (1985) 1205-1216
65. Truckenbrodt H. Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology 19 (2002) 77-120
66. Truckenbrodt H. Final lowering in non-final position. Journal of Phonetics 32 (2004) 313-348
67. Xu Y. Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics 25 (1997) 61-83