Warm or competent? Improving intergroup relations by addressing threatened identities of advantaged and disadvantaged groups

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 482-492

  Shnabel, Nurit ^a   Ullrich, Johannes ^b   Nadler, Arie ^a   Dovidio, John F ^c   Aydin, Anna Lisa ^d  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901248145     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1975     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063-1065.
2. Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York: Henry Holt.
3. Becker, J. C. (2012). Virtual special issue on theory and research on collective action in the European Journal of Social Psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 19-23.
4. Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62-77.
5. Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264.
6. Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). How to show that 9>221: Collect judgments in a between subjects design. Psychological Methods, 4, 243-249.
7. Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V., & DuNann Winter, D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63, 540-552.
8. Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal strategy: A "reality check" for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.
9. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Ditlmann, R. K., & West, T. V. (2012). Intergroup relations in post-conflict contexts: How the past influences the present (and the future). In K. J. Jonas, & T. Morton (Eds.), Restoring civil societies: The psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis (pp. 135-155). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2008). Another view of "we": Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296-330.
11. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.
12. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C, Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
13. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167-191.
14. Gergen, K. J. (1999). Agency: Social construction and relational action. Theory and Psychology, 9, 113-115.
15. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
16. Harth, N. S., Kessler, T., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Advantaged group's emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115-129.
17. Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
18. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system justification ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-264.
19. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
20. Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Judd, C. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155-187.
21. Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
22. Leunissen, J. M., De Cremer, D., & Reinders Folmer, C. P. (2012). An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 215-222.
23. LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: John Wiley.
24. Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
25. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245.
26. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2004). Intergroup reconciliation process in Israel: Theoretical analysis and empirical findings. In N. R. Branscombe, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 216-235). Cambridge: University Press.
27. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients' trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470.
28. Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: The instrumental and socio-emotional paths and the need based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2011). Promoting intergroup reconciliation in conflicts involving direct and structural violence: Implications of the Needs-Based Model. In L. R. Tropp, & R. Mallett (Eds.), Moving beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 201-219). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Osgood, C. E. (1962). An alternative to war or surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
31. Pearson, A. R., West, T. V., Dovidio, J. F., Powers, S. R., Buck, R., & Henning, R. (2008). The fragility of intergroup relations: Divergent effects of delayed audiovisual feedback in intergroup and intragroup interaction. Psychological Science, 19, 1272-1279.
32. Reicher, S. D. (1996). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317-337). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
33. Roccas, S. (2003). The effects of status on identification with multiple groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 352-366.
34. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
35. Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523-528.
36. Saguy, T., & Chernyak-Hai, L. (2012). Intergroup contact can undermine disadvantaged group members' attributions to discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 714-720.
37. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114-121.
38. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
39. Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132.
40. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J. Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030.
41. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Siem, B., von Oettingen, M., Mummendey, A., & Nadler, A. (2013). When status differences are illegitimate, groups' needs diverge: Testing the needs-based model of reconciliation in contexts of status inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 137-148. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1929
43. Staub, E., Pearlman, L. A., Gubin, A., & Hagengimana, A. (2005). Healing, reconciliation, forgiving and the prevention of violence after genocide or mass killing: An intervention and its experimental evaluation in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 297-334.
44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
45. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2010). The social psychology of 'Making Poverty History': Motivating anti-poverty action in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 45, 4-15.
46. Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationship between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951-957.
47. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
48. Vorauer, J. D., & Sakamoto, Y. (2008). Who cares what the outgroup thinks? Testing an information search model of the importance individuals accord to an outgroup member's view of them during intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1467-1480.
49. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
50. Zhong, C. B., Liljenquist, K., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75-89). New York: Information Age Publishing.