Optimal sensory evaluation protocol to model concentration-response curve of sweeteners

Food Research International

Volumn 62, Issue , 2014, Pages 886-893

  Choi, Ji hye ^a   Chung, Seo jin ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Concentration response curve; Rating method; Sensory analysis; Sweetener; Sweetness potency

Indexed keywords

FOOD ADDITIVES; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES;

CONCENTRATION LEVELS; CONCENTRATION METHOD; CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE CURVE; LOW CONCENTRATIONS; REFERENCE STANDARD; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SWEETENER; SWEETNESS POTENCY;

SUGAR (SUCROSE);

EID: 84901195014     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cadena R.S., Bolini H.M.A. Time-intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream. Food Research International 2011, 44:677-683.
2. Cadena R.S., Cruz A.G., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: Sensory profiling and external preference mapping. Journal of Dairy Science 2012, 95:4842-4850.
3. Cardello H.M.A.B., Da Silva M.A.P.A., Damasio M.H. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 1999, 54:119-129.
4. Cardoso J.M.P., Bolini H.M.A. Different sweeteners in peach nectar: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. Food Research International 2007, 40:1249-1253.
5. Choi J.-H., Kim K.-P., Chung S.-J. Relative sweetness and sweetness quality of low calorie sweeteners in milk and coffee model system. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 2013, 45:754-762.
6. Clark C.C., Lawless H.T. Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: An examination of the halo-dumping effect. Chemical Senses 1994, 19:583-594.
7. De Souza V.R., Pinheiro A.C., Carneiro J.D.D.S., Pinto S., Abreu L.R., Menezes C.C. Analysis of various sweeteners in Petit Suisse cheese: Determination of the ideal and equivalent sweetness. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:339-345.
8. Diamond J., Lawless H.T. Context effects and reference standards with magnitude estimation and the labeled magnitude scale. Journal of Sensory Studies 2001, 16:1-10.
9. Esmerino E.A., Cruz A.G., Pereira E.P.R., Rodrigues J.B., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. The influence of sweeteners in probiotic Petit Suisse cheese in concentrations equivalent to that of sucrose. Journal of Dairy Science 2013, 96:5512-5521.
10. Fry J.C., Yurttas N., Biermann K.L. Sweetness concentration-response behavior of Rebiana at room and refrigerator temperatures. Journal of Food Science 2011, 76:S545-S548.
11. Fry J.C., Yurttas N., Biermann K.L., Lindley M.G., Goulson M.J. The sweetness concentration-response of R,R-Monatin, a naturally occurring high-potency sweetener. Journal of Food Science 2012, 77:S362-S364.
12. Fujimaru T., Park J.H., Lim J. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 2012, 77:S323-S328.
13. Heenan S.P., Dufour J.P., Hamid N., Harvey W., Delahunt C.M. The influence of ingredients and time from baking on sensory quality and consumer freshness perceptions in a baked model cake system. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2010, 43:1032-1041.
14. Kim M., Cho H., Park J., Lee S., Suh D., Chung S., et al. Relative sweetness of sucralose in beverage systems and sensory properties of low calorie beverages containing sucralose. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 2005, 37:425-430.
15. Kim K.O., O'mahony M. A new approach to category scales of intensity i: Traditional versus rank-rating. Journal of Sensory Studies 1998, 13:241-249.
16. Lawless H.T., Horne J., Spiers W. Contrast and range effects for category, magnitude and labeled magnitude scales in judgements of sweetness intensity. Chemical Senses 2000, 25:85-92.
17. Lin S.D., Lee C.C., Mau J.L., Lin L.Y., Chiou S.Y. Effect of erythritol on quality characteristics of reduced-calorie Danish cookies. Journal of Food Quality 2010, 33:14-26.
18. Martinez-Cervera S., Sanz T., Salvador A., Fiszman S.M. Rheological, textural and sensorial properties of low-sucrose muffins reformulated with sucralose/polydextrose. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2012, 45:213-220.
19. Moraes T., Barbosa P.C., Bolini H., André M. Different sweeteners in beverages prepared with instant and roasted ground coffee: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:215-225.
20. Moskowitz H.R. Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Perception & Psychophysics 1970, 7:315-320.
21. Olabi A., Lawless H. Persistence of context effects after training and with intensity references. Journal of Food Science 2008, 73:S185-S189.
22. Palazzo A.B., Bolini H.M.A. Multiple time-intensity analysis: sweetness, bitterness, chocolate flavor and melting rate of chocolate with sucralose, rebaudioside and neotame. Journal of Sensory Studies 2014, 29:21-32.
23. Parducci A., Wedell D.H. The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1986, 12:496.
24. Park J.Y., Jeon S.Y., O'mahony M., Kim K.O. Induction of scaling errors. Journal of Sensory Studies 2004, 19:261-271.
25. Patil S., Ravi R., Saraswathi G., Prakash M. Development of low calorie snack food based on intense sweeteners. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2012, 10.1007/s13197-012-0911-9.
26. Portmann M.-O., Kilcast D. Psychophysical characterization of new sweeteners of commercial importance for the EC food industry. Food Chemistry 1996, 56:291-302.
27. Poulton E.C. Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:777-803.
28. Poulton C. Bias and range effects in sensory judgments. Chemistry and Industry 1987, 1:18-22.
29. Reis R.C., Minim V.P.R., Bolini H.M.A., Dias B.R.P., Minim L.A., Ceresino E.B. Sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in strawberry-flavored yogurt. Journal of Food Quality 2011, 34:163-170.
30. Ribeiro K.O., Rodrigues M.I., Sabadini E., Cunha R.L. Mechanical properties of acid sodium caseinate-k-carrageenan gels: Effect of co-solute addition. Food Hydrocolloids 2004, 18:71-79.
31. Schifferstein H.N. Contextual effects in difference judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:56-70.
32. Schifferstein H.N. Cognitive factors affecting taste intensity judgments. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:167-175.
33. Stillman J. Context effects in judging taste intensity: A comparison of variable line and category rating methods. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 54:477-484.
34. Taylor T.P., Fasina O., Bell L.N. Physical properties and consumer liking of cookies prepared by replacing sucrose with tagatose. Journal of Food Science 2008, 73:S145-S151.
35. Williams E.J. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Austrian Journal of Scientific Research A 1949, 2:149-168.
36. Yau N., Mcdaniel M., Bodyfelt F. Sensory evaluation of sweetened flavored carbonated milk beverages. Journal of Dairy Science 1989, 72:367-377.
37. Zahn S., Forker A., Krügel L., Rohm H. Combined use of rebaudioside A and fibres for partial sucrose replacement in muffins. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2013, 50:695-701.