Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 7415-7420

  Liao, Can ^a   Yin, Ai Hua ^b,c,d   Peng, Chun Fang ^e   Fu, Fang ^a   Yang, Jie Xia ^b,c   Li, Ru ^a   Chen, Yang Yi ^e   Luo, Dong Hong ^e   Zhang, Yong Ling ^a   Ou, Yan Mei ^a   Li, Jian ^a   Wu, Jing ^b,c   Mai, Ming Qin ^b,c   Hou, Rui ^f   Wu, Frances ^g   Luo, Hongrong ^g,h   Li, Dong Zhi ^a   Liu, Hai Liang ^e   Zhang, Xiao Zhuang ^b,c,d   Zhang, Kang ^g,i  

^a GUANGZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Prenatal Diagnosis Centre   (China)

^c Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital   (China)

^d Guangdong Thalassemia Diagnostic Centre   (China)

^e IGenomics Co Ltd   (China)

^f Guangzhou KangRui Biological Pharmaceutical Technology Company Ltd   (China)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

ⁱ VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE 45,X; KARYOTYPE 47,XXX; KARYOTYPE 47,XXY; KARYOTYPE 47,XYY; KARYOTYPING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING; SEMICONDUCTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; TRISOMY 13; TRISOMY 18; TRISOMY 21;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 13; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 18; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MALE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEMICONDUCTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRISOMY;

EID: 84901020406     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321997111     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Driscoll DA, Gross S (2009) Clinical practice. Prenatal screening for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med 360(24):2556-2562.
2. Zhang YP, et al. (2011) [Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 46(9):644-648.
3. Rives N, Simon N, Milazzo JP, Barthlmy C, Mac B (2003) Meiotic segregation of sex chromosomes in mosaic and non-mosaic XYY males: Case reports and review of the literature. Int J Androl 26(4):242-249.
4. Park JH, et al. (2008) Effects of sex chromosome aneuploidy on male sexual behavior. Genes Brain Behav 7(6):609-617.
5. Tartaglia NR, Howell S, Sutherland A, Wilson R, Wilson L (2010) A review of trisomy X (47,XXX). Orphanet J Rare Dis 5(1):8.
6. Sybert VP, McCauley E (2004) Turners syndrome. N Engl J Med 351(12):1227-1238.
7. Bouchlariotou S, et al. (2011) Turners syndrome and pregnancy: Has the 45,X/47,XXX mosaicism a different prognosis? Own clinical experience and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24(5):668-672.
8. Leggett V, Jacobs P, Nation K, Scerif G, Bishop DV (2010) Neurocognitive outcomes of individuals with a sex chromosome trisomy: XXX, XYY, or XXY: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 52(2):119-129.
9. Hofherr SE, Wiktor AE, Kipp BR, Dawson DB, Van Dyke DL (2011) Clinical diagnostic testing for the cytogenetic and molecular causes of male infertility: The Mayo Clinic experience. J Assist Reprod Genet 28(11):1091-1098.
10. Korteweg FJ, et al. (2008) Cytogenetic analysis after evaluation of 750 fetal deaths: Proposal for diagnostic workup. Obstet Gynecol 111(4):865-874.
11. Bin W, Yingyao C, Qi S (2006) The economic burden of Downs syndrome in China. Chin Health Econ 25(3):24-26.
12. Williams ES, Cornforth MN, Goodwin EH, Bailey SM (2011) CO-FISH, COD-FISH, ReDFISH, SKY-FISH. Methods Mol Biol 735(1):113-124.
13. Leung TY, et al. (2011) Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38(3):314-319.
14. Vermeesch JR, et al. (2007) Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis. Eur J Hum Genet 15(11):1105-1114.
15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 110(6):1459-1467.
16. Nanal R, Kyle P, Soothill PW (2003) A classification of pregnancy losses after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: An approach to allow comparison of units with a different case mix. Prenat Diagn 23(6):488-492.
17. Tabor A, Alfirevic Z (2010) Update on procedure-related risks for prenatal diagnosis techniques. Fetal Diagn Ther 27(1):1-7.
18. Norton ME, et al. (2012) Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: Results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(2):e1-e8.
19. Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Ashoor G, Birdir C, Touzet G (2012) Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(5):e1-e6.
20. Palomaki GE, et al. (2011) DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: An international clinical validation study. Genet Med 13(11):913-920.
21. Bianchi DW, et al. (2012) Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstet Gynecol 119(5):890-901.
22. Bianchi DW, et al. (2014) DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med 370(9):799-808.
23. Chiu RW, et al. (2008) Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(51):20458-20463.
24. Fan HC, Blumenfeld YJ, Chitkara U, Hudgins L, Quake SR (2008) Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(42):16266-16271.
25. Dan S, et al. (2012) Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11,105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors. Prenat Diagn 32(13):1225-1232.
26. Koboldt DC, Ding L, Mardis ER, Wilson RK (2010) Challenges of sequencing human genomes. Brief Bioinform 11(5):484-498.
27. Fan HC, Quake SR (2010) Sensitivity of noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma using shotgun sequencing is limited only by counting statistics. PLoS One 5(5):e10439.
28. Chiu RW, et al. (2001) Effects of blood-processing protocols on fetal and total DNA quantification in maternal plasma. Clin Chem 47(9):1607-1613.
29. Rothberg JM, et al. (2011) An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 475(7356):348-352.
30. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754-1760.
31. Alkan C, et al. (2009) Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat Genet 41(10):1061-1067.
32. Jiang F, et al. (2012) Noninvasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test: An advanced noninvasive prenatal diagnosis methodology for fetal autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies. BMC Med Genomics 5(1):57.
33. Chen EZ, et al. (2011) Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. PLoS One 6(7):e21791.