Graphene-based nanobiocatalytic systems: Recent advances and future prospects

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 312-320

  Pavlidis, Ioannis V ^a,b   Patila, Michaela ^a   Bornscheuer, Uwe T ^b   Gournis, Dimitrios ^a   Stamatis, Haralambos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biofuel cells; Enzyme immobilization; Enzyme nanomaterial interactions; Graphene based nanomaterials; Nanobiocatalysis

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL FUEL CELLS; ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION; GRAPHENE; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

CATALYTIC BEHAVIOR; FUTURE PROSPECTS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; NANOBIOCATALYSIS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

BIOFUEL; GRAPHENE; IMMOBILIZED ENZYME; GRAPHITE; NANOMATERIAL;

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMEDICINE; BIOSENSOR; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY YIELD; ENZYME ENGINEERING; ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION; HUMAN; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NANOCATALYSIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THERMOSTABILITY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; BIOREACTOR; CHEMISTRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BIOREACTORS; ENZYMES, IMMOBILIZED; GRAPHITE; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84901002787     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Kim J., et al. Nanobiocatalysis and its potential applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26:639-646.
2. Verma M.L., et al. Nanobiotechnology as a novel paradigm for enzyme immobilisation and stabilisation with potential applications in biodiesel production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:23-39.
3. Ge J., et al. Nanobiocatalysis in organic media: opportunities for enzymes in nanostructures. Top. Catal. 2012, 55:1070-1080.
4. Ansari S.A., Husain Q. Potential applications of enzymes immobilized on/in nano materials: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30:512-523.
5. Talbert J.N., Goddard J.M. Enzymes on material surfaces. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2012, 93:8-19.
6. Mateo C., et al. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40:1451-1463.
7. Rana S., et al. Engineering the nanoparticle-protein interface: applications and possibilities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14:828-834.
8. Bornscheuer U.T. Immobilizing enzymes: how to create more suitable biocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2003, 42:3336-3337.
9. Cao L., Schmid R.D. Carrier-bound Immobilized Enzymes: Principles, Application and Design 2006, Wiley-VCH.
10. Sassolas A., et al. Immobilization strategies to develop enzymatic biosensors. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30:489-511.
11. Johnson P.A., et al. Enzyme nanoparticle fabrication: magnetic nanoparticle synthesis and enzyme immobilization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 679:183-191.
12. Coleman J.N., et al. Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 2011, 331:568-571.
13. Nicolosi V., et al. Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 2013, 340. 10.1126/science.1226419.
14. Bitounis D., et al. Prospects and challenges of graphene in biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25:2258-2268.
15. Du D., et al. Graphene-based materials for biosensing and bioimaging. MRS Bull. 2012, 37:1290-1296.
16. Goenka S., et al. Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J. Control. Release 2014, 173:75-88.
17. Krishna K.V., et al. Graphene-based nanomaterials for nanobiotechnology and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine 2013, 8:1669-1688.
18. Geim A.K., Novoselov K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6:183-191.
19. Wang Y., et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29:205-212.
20. Gokhale A.A., et al. Immobilization of cellulase on magnetoresponsive graphene nano-supports. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2013, 90:76-86.
21. Jin L., et al. Functionalized graphene oxide in enzyme engineering: a selective modulator for enzyme activity and thermostability. ACS Nano 2012, 6:4864-4875.
22. Pavlidis I.V., et al. Development of effective nanobiocatalytic systems through the immobilization of hydrolases on functionalized carbon-based nanomaterials. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 115:164-171.
23. Dai L. Functionalization of graphene for efficient energy conversion and storage. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46:31-42.
24. Loh K.P., et al. The chemistry of graphene. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20:2277-2289.
25. Sun X., et al. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res. 2008, 1:203-212.
26. Wang H., et al. Graphene oxide-peptide conjugate as an intracellular protease sensor for caspase-3 activation imaging in live cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50:7065-7069.
27. Cho Y., et al. A graphene oxide-photosensitizer complex as an enzyme-activatable theranostic agent. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2013, 49:1202-1204.
28. Kuila T., et al. Recent advances in graphene-based biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26:4637-4648.
29. Putzbach W., Ronkainen N.J. Immobilization techniques in the fabrication of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors: a review. Sensors 2013, 13:4811-4840.
30. Walcarius A., et al. Nanomaterials for bio-functionalized electrodes: recent trends. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1:4878-4908.
31. Bao H., et al. Immobilization of trypsin in the layer-by-layer coating of graphene oxide and chitosan on in-channel glass fiber for microfluidic proteolysis. Analyst 2011, 136:5190-5196.
32. Liang R.P., et al. Construction of graphene oxide magnetic nanocomposites-based on-chip enzymatic microreactor for ultrasensitive pesticide detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1315:28-35.
33. Kane R.S., Stroock A.D. Nanobiotechnology: protein-nanomaterial interactions. Biotechnol. Prog. 2007, 23:316-319.
34. Jiang B., et al. Hydrophilic immobilized trypsin reactor with magnetic graphene oxide as support for high efficient proteome digestion. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1254:8-13.
35. Pavlidis I.V., et al. Regulation of catalytic behaviour of hydrolases through interactions with functionalized carbon-based nanomaterials. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14. 10.1007/s11051-012-0842-4.
36. Shao Q., et al. Insight into the effects of graphene oxide sheets on the conformation and activity of glucose oxidase: towards developing a nanomaterial-based protein conformation assay. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14:9076-9085.
37. Zhang Y., et al. Assembly of graphene oxide-enzyme conjugates through hydrophobic interaction. Small 2012, 8:154-159.
38. Zuo X., et al. Graphene oxide-facilitated electron transfer of metalloproteins at electrode surfaces. Langmuir 2010, 26:1936-1939.
39. Shao Q., et al. Graphene oxide-induced conformation changes of glucose oxidase studied by infrared spectroscopy. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2013, 109:115-120.
40. Zhang J., et al. Graphene oxide as a matrix for enzyme immobilization. Langmuir 2010, 26:6083-6085.
41. Patila M., et al. Enhancement of cytochrome c catalytic behaviour by affecting the heme environment using functionalized carbon-based nanomaterials. Proc. Biochem. 2013, 48:1010-1017.
42. Raffaini G., Ganazzoli F. Surface topography effects in protein adsorption on nanostructured carbon allotropes. Langmuir 2013, 29:4883-4893.
43. Yang X., et al. Contrasting modulation of enzyme activity exhibited by graphene oxide and reduced graphene. Chem. Commun. (Comb.) 2013, 49:8611-8613.
44. Shim M., et al. Functionalization of carbon nanotubes for biocompatibility and biomolecular recognition. Nano Lett. 2002, 2:285-288.
45. Mesarič T., et al. Effects of surface curvature and surface characteristics of carbon-based nanomaterials on the adsorption and activity of acetylcholinesterase. Carbon 2013, 62:222-232.
46. Wei X.L., Ge Z.Q. Effect of graphene oxide on conformation and activity of catalase. Carbon 2013, 60:401-409.
47. Li Q., et al. Enzyme immobilization on carboxyl-functionalized graphene oxide for catalysis in organic solvent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52:6343-6348.
48. Hua B.Y., et al. Greatly improved catalytic activity and direct electron transfer rate of cytochrome C due to the confinement effect in a layered self-assembly structure. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:2316-2318.
49. Alwarappan S., et al. Comparative study of single-, few-, and multilayered graphene toward enzyme conjugation and electrochemical response. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116:6556-6559.
50. Zhang F., et al. Horseradish peroxidase immobilized on graphene oxide: physical properties and applications in phenolic compound removal. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114:8469-8473.
51. Park J.H., et al. Immobilization of laccase on carbon nanomaterials. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 29:1409-1412.
52. Pavlidis I.V., et al. Functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes for lipase immobilization. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2010, 12:B179-B183.
53. Cazorla C., et al. Calcium-based functionalization of carbon nanostructures for peptide immobilization in aqueous media. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22:19684-19693.
54. Jiang Y., et al. Glucose oxidase and graphene bionanocomposite bridged by ionic liquid unit for glucose biosensing application. Sensors Actuators B 2012, 161:728-733.
55. Gao Y., Kyratzis I. Covalent immobilization of proteins on carbon nanotubes using the cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide - a critical assessment. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19:1945-1950.
56. Stavyiannoudaki V., et al. Comparison of protein immobilisation methods onto oxidised and native carbon nanofibres for optimum biosensor development. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395:429-435.
57. Liu Y., et al. Biocompatible graphene oxide-based glucose biosensors. Langmuir 2010, 26:6158-6160.
58. Shen J., et al. Covalent attaching protein to graphene oxide via diimide-activated amidation. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2010, 81:434-438.
59. Xu G., et al. Immobilization of trypsin on graphene oxide for microwave-assisted on-plate proteolysis combined with MALDI-MS analysis. Analyst 2012, 137:2757-2761.
60. Su R., et al. Studies on the properties of graphene oxide-alkaline protease bio-composites. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 115:136-140.
61. Manjunatha R., et al. An amperometric bienzymatic cholesterol biosensor based on functionalized graphene modified electrode and its electrocatalytic activity towards total cholesterol determination. Talanta 2012, 99:302-309.
62. 4-hemoglobin composite in an electrochemical reactor. Proc. Biochem. 2012, 47:2480-2486.
63. Chen R.J., et al. Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123:3838-3839.
64. Huang Y., et al. Nanoelectronic biosensors based on CVD grown graphene. Nanoscale 2010, 2:1485-1488.
65. Wang G., et al. Gold nanoparticles/L-cysteine/graphene composite based immobilization strategy for an electrochemical immunosensor. Anal. Methods 2010, 2:1692-1697.
66. Loo A.H., et al. Biorecognition on graphene: physical, covalent, and affinity immobilization methods exhibiting dramatic differences. Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8:198-203.
67. Chen H-M., et al. Effect of graphene oxide on affinity-immobilization of purple membranes on solid supports. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2014, 116:482-488.
68. Azamian B.R., et al. Bioelectrochemical single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124:12664-12665.
69. Kishore D., et al. Immobilization of β-galactosidase onto functionalized graphene nano-sheets using response surface methodology and its analytical applications. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040708.
70. Huang C., et al. A graphene oxide/hemoglobin composite hydrogel for enzymatic catalysis in organic solvents. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47:4962-4964.
71. Kim J., et al. Nanobiocatalysis for protein digestion in proteomic analysis. Proteomics 2010, 10:687-699.
72. Jiao J., et al. Realization of on-tissue protein identification by highly efficient in situ digestion with graphene-immobilized trypsin for MALDI imaging analysis. Analyst 2013, 138:1645-1648.
73. Bao H., et al. Immobilization of trypsin via graphene oxide-silica composite for efficient microchip proteolysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1310:74-81.
74. 2 biofuel cell: preparation, characterization and performance in serum. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9:989-996.
75. Gao F., et al. Engineering hybrid nanotube wires for high-power biofuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1:1-7.
76. Liu Y., Dong S. A biofuel cell harvesting energy from glucose-air and fruit juice-air. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23:593-597.
77. Liu C., et al. Membraneless enzymatic biofuel cells based on graphene nanosheets. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25:1829-1833.
78. Wang X., et al. Graphene as a spacer to layer-by-layer assemble electrochemically functionalized nanostructures for molecular bioelectronic devices. Langmuir 2011, 27:11180-11186.
79. 2 biofuel cell based on graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotube composite modified electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7:8064-8075.
80. 4 magnetic nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as a novel electrochemical and bioeletrochemical sensing platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 49:1-8.
81. Bahartan K., et al. In situ fuel processing in a microbial fuel cell. ChemSusChem 2012, 5:1820-1825.
82. Bahartan K., et al. Encapsulation of yeast displaying glucose oxidase on their surface in graphene oxide hydrogel scaffolding and its bioactivation. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:11957-11959.
83. Georgakilas V., et al. Tuning the dispersibility of carbon nanostructures from organophilic to hydrophilic: towards the preparation of new multipurpose carbon-based hybrids. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19:12884-12891.
84. Lerf A., et al. Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102:4477-4482.
85. Bourlinos A.B., et al. Graphite oxide: chemical reduction to graphite and surface modification with primary aliphatic amines and amino acids. Langmuir 2003, 19:6050-6055.
86. Dreyer D.R., et al. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39:228-240.
87. Gengler R.Y.N., et al. Revealing the ultrafast process behind the photoreduction of graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4. 10.1038/ncomms3560.
88. Bagri A., et al. Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2:581-587.
89. Shan C., et al. Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and biosensing for glucose based on graphene. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:2378-2382.
90. Sun W., et al. Electrochemistry of horseradish peroxidase entrapped in graphene and dsDNA composite modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 75:381-386.
91. Zhang Y., et al. Glass carbon electrode modified with horseradish peroxidase immobilized on partially reduced graphene oxide for detecting phenolic compounds. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2012, 681:49-55.
92. Liu X., et al. Preparation of graphene nanoplatelet-titanate nanotube composite and its advantages over the two single components as biosensor immobilization materials. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 51:76-81.
93. Chen H., Zhao G. Nanocomposite of polymerized ionic liquid and graphene used as modifier for direct electrochemistry of cytochrome c and nitric oxide biosensing. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2012, 16:3289-3297.
94. Wu J.F., et al. Graphene-based modified electrode for the direct electron transfer of cytochrome c and biosensing. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12:175-177.
95. Li Z., et al. Graphene materials-based energy acceptor systems and sensors. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 2013, 18:1-17.
96. Li Z.J., Xia Q.F. Recent advances on synthesis and application of graphene as novel sensing materials in analytical chemistry. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012, 31:57-81.