Stakeholders' perceptions of participation in forest policy: A case study from Baden-Württemberg

Land Use Policy

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 166-176

  Maier, Carolin ^a   Lindner, Theresia ^a   Winkel, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Forest management; Forest policy; Germany; Participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900987046     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abram S., Cowell R. Dilemmas of implementation: 'Integration' and 'Participation' in Norwegian and Scottish local government. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2004, 22:701-719.
2. Acharya K.P. Conserving biodiversity and improving livelihoods: the case of community forestry in Nepal 2004, Online verfügbar unter http://www.cifor.org/publications/corporate/cd-roms/bonn-proc/pdfs/papers/T4_FINAL_Acharya.pdf.
3. Agrawal A., Gibson C.C. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 1999, 27(4):629-649.
4. Bogumil J. Verwaltung und Verwaltungswissenschaft in Deutschland 2005, VS Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden.
5. Booth A., Halseth G. Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: a case study of British Columbia communities. Land Use Policy 2011, 28(4):898-906.
6. Borrass L. Varying practices of implementing the Habitats Directive in German and British forests. Forest Policy and Economics 2014, 38:151-160.
7. Bouwma I.M., van Apeldoorn R., Kamphorst D.A. Current Practices in Solving Multiple Use Issues of Natura 2000 Sites: Conflict Management Strategies and Participatory Approaches 2010, Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
8. Bouwma I.M., van Apeldoorn R., Cil A., Snethlage M., McIntosh N., Nowicki N., Braat L.S. Natura 2000 - Addressing Conflicts and Promoting Benefits 2000, Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
9. Buchy M., Hoverman S. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. Forest Policy and Economics 2000, 1:15-25.
10. Bulkeley H., Mol A. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values 2003, 12:143-154.
11. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen und SPD Der Wechsel beginnt - Koalitionsvertrag zwischen BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen und der SPD Baden-Württemberg 2011, Available at http://www.dokumente.wscms-basis.de/Koalitionsvertrag-web.pdf.
12. Cantiani M.G. Forest planning and public participation: a possible methodological approach. iForest 2012, 5(2):72-82.
13. Cappelmann L., Schraml U., Winkel G., Volz K.-R. Forderungen des Naturschutzes an die Forstwirtschaft. Wissenschaftliche Synopse zu Anforderungen des Naturschutzes an die Forstwirtschaft in Baden-Württemberg. Arbeitsbericht 04/2011 2011, Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg Fakultät für Forst-und Umweltwissenschaften.
14. Creighton J.L. The Public Participation Handbook - Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
15. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making 2008, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. T. Dietz, P.C. Stern (Eds.).
16. Dolly A. From state regulation to people's participation: case of forest management in India. Economic and Political Weekly 1994, 29(12):691-698.
17. Elsasser P. Rules for participation and negotiation and their possible influence on the content of a National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics 2002, 4:291-300.
18. Feindt P.H., Newig J. Politische Ökonomie von partizipation und Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung im nachhlatigkeitskontext - probleme und Forschungsperspektiven. Partizipation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Nachhaltigkeit - Perspektiven der politischen Ökonomie 2005, 9-40. Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, (Ökologie und Wirtschaftsforschung 62). P.H. Feindt, J. Newig (Eds.).
19. Fey, G., 2012. Projekthandbuch Novelle des Landesjagdgesetzes. Unpublished Manuskript.
20. FVA-Baden-Württemberg Gesamtkonzeption Waldnaturschutz 2012, Infothek, Available online http://www.waldnaturschutz-forstbw.de/page1405.html.
21. NFP Research: Its Retrospect and Outlook: Proceedings of the Seminar of COST Action E19 National Forest Programmes in a European context, vol. 52 2003, Publication Series of the Institute of Forest Sector Policy and Economics. P. Glück, J. Voitleithner (Eds.).
22. Hartard B., Wirth T., Hehn M., Waldenspuhl T. Situationsanalyse - Mitwirkung und Einbindung bei der Waldpflege. Manuskript. Forstliche Versuches- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg 2011, Abteilung Wald und Gesellschaft, Freiburg, Draft 08.09.2011.
23. Healey P. Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies 1997, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. 2nd ed.
24. Heltberg R. Property rights and natural resource management in developing countries. Journal of Economic Surveys 2002, 16(2):189-214.
25. Heinrichs H., Kuhn K., Newig J. Nachhaltige Gesellschaft: Welche Rolle für Partizipation und Kooperation? 2011, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
26. Howlett M., Rayner J. Globalization and governance capacity: explaining divergence in National Forest Programs as instances of next-generation regulation in Canada and Europe. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 2006, 19(2):251-275.
27. Johnson N.K. Will linking science to policy lead to sustainable forestry? Lessons from the federal forests of the United States. Sustainable Forestry. From Monitoring and Modelling to Knowledge Management and Policy Science 2007, 14-34. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK. K.M. Reynolds, A.J. Thomson, M. Köhl, M.A. Shannon, D. Ray, K. Rennolls (Eds.).
28. King C.S., Stivers C. Government is US: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era 1998, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. Koontz T.M. SSPP: collaboration for sustainability? A framework for analyzing government impacts in collaborative environmental management. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 2006, 2(1):15-24.
30. Koontz T.M., Thomas C.W. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management?. Public Administration Review 2006, 66(1):111-121.
31. Krott M. Politikfeldanalyse Forstwirtschaft 2001, Eine Einführung für Studium und Praxis, Berlin, Parey.
32. Leach W.D. Public involvement in USDA forest service policymaking: a literature review. Journal of Forestry 2006, 104(1):43-49.
33. Lüchtrath A., Liebmann S., Schraml U. Vom Gerichtssaal zu gemeinsamen Strategien: Entwicklung des Luchskonflikts in Baden-Württemberg aus Sicht der beteiligten Akteure. Natur und Landschaft 2012, 87(3):114-118.
34. Michener V.J. The participatory approach: contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso. World Development 1998, 36(12):2105-2118.
35. MLR Nationalpark Nordschwarzwald. Bürgerbeteiligung Ministerium für Verbraucherschutz und den ländlichen Raum 2013, Available online: http://www.nordschwarzwald-nationalpark.de/index.php?id=85.
36. Moseley C. New ideas, old institutions: environment, community, and state in the Pacific Northwest 1999, (Ph.D. Dissertation), Yale University, New Haven, CT.
37. Moseley C., Winkel G. Sustainable Forest Management on Federal Lands in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Making Sense of Science, Conflict, and Collaboration. Forests Under Pressure: Local Solutions to Global Issues. IUFRO World Series 2013, (in print). P. Katila, G. Galloway, W. de Jong, P. Pacheco, G. Mery, R. Alfaro (Eds.).
38. NABU Moderne und zeitgemäße Jagd. Naturschutzbund Baden-Württemberg 2012, Available online http://baden-wuerttemberg.nabu.de/themen/wald/jagd/14962.html.
39. Newig J. Partizipation und neue Formen der Governance. Handbuch Umweltsoziologie 2011, 486-502. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. 1. Aufl. M. Groß (Ed.).
40. Newig J., Fritsch O. Effektivität von Beteiligungsprozessen. Beiträge des Instituts für Umweltsystemforschung der Universität Osnabrück, Bd. 34 2006, 1-84. Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück. M. Matthies (Ed.).
41. Newig J., Fritsch O. Der Beitrag zivilgesellschaftlicher Partizipation zur Effektivitätssteigerung von Governance Eine Analyse umweltpolitischer Beteiligungsverfahren im transatlantischen Vergleich. Bürgergesellschaft als Projekt. Eine Bestandsaufnahme zu Entwicklung und Förderung zivilgesellschaftlicher Potenziale in Deutschland 2009, 214-239. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. 1. Aufl. I. Bode, A. Evers, A. und Klein (Eds.).
42. Newig J., Fritsch O. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?. Environmental Policy and Governance 2009, 19(3):197-214.
43. Olsen M. The Logic of Collective Action 1971, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
44. Rauschmayer F., van den Hove S., Koetz T. Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric?. Environmental Planning C 2009, 27(1):42-58.
45. Ott W. Forstpolitische Zielsetzung zwischen Ökonomie und Ökologie. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 1987, 37(34):873-876.
46. Rasche K., Krywkow J., Newig J., Hare M. Assessing the intensity of participation along six dimensions. Paper Presented at the Conference CAIWA 12.-15.11.2007 2007, Available online: http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/pathconference/outputs/PATH_abstract_3.3.3.pdf.
47. Renn O. Risk Governance - Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World 2008, Earthscan, London.
48. Robinson C.J., Margerum R.D., Koontz T.M., Moseley C., Lurie S. Policy-level collaboratives for environmental management at the regional scale: lessons and challenges from Australia and the United States. Society and Natural Resources 2011, 24(8):849-859.
49. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 2000, 25(1):3-29.
50. Sanders L.M. Against deliberation. Political Theory 1997, 25(3):347-376.
51. Schanz H. National forest programmes as discursive institutions. Forest Policy and Economics 2002, 4(4):269-279.
52. Scott J.C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed 2008, Yale University Press (The Yale ISPS series), New Haven, CT.
53. Somanathan E., Prabhakar R., Mehta B.S. Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(11):4143-4147.
54. Stenseke M. Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):214-223.
55. Swearingen White S. Public participation and organizational change in Wisconsin land use management. Land Use Policy 2001, 18:341-350.
56. United Nations Public Participation in Forestry in Europe and North America. Report of the Team of Specialists on Participation in Forestry 2000, Joint FAO/ECE/ILO Committee on Forest Technology, Management and Training, Geneva.
57. van Tatenhove J.P.M., Leroy P. Environment and participation in a context of political modernization. Environmental Values 2003, 12:155-174.
58. Volz K.-R. Zur ordnungspolitischen Diskussion über die nachhaltige Nutzung der Zentralressource Wald. Forst und Holz 1995, 50(6):163-170.
59. Volz K.-R. Zur Rolle des Staatswaldes in unserer Gesellschaft. Forst und Holz 2000, 55(17):550-552.
60. Walker P.A., Hurley P.T. Collaboration derailed: the politics of community-based resource management in Nevada County. Society & Natural Resources 2004, 17(8):735-751.
61. Weber N. Neue Akteure in der forstpolitischen Arena. Forst und Holz 1999, 54:355-359.
62. Weber, N., 2003. Die Rolle der Umweltverbände in der Forstpolitik. Einzelverbändliche und verbandssystemische Analyse der neuen Akteure im ökologischen Konflikt um die qualitative Walderhaltung. State doctorate thesis at the University of Freiburg, unpublished.
63. Wesselink A., Paavola J., Fritsch O., Renn O. Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners' perspectives. Environment and Planning 2011, 43(11):2688-2704.
64. White A., Martin A. Who owns the world's forests? Forest tenure and public forest in transition. The Earthscan Reader in Forestry and Development 2005, 72-104. Routledge. J. Sayer (Ed.).
65. Winkel G. Forstpolitik. Handbuch Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege 2008, Wiley VCH, Weinheim. 21. Ergaenzungslieferung, 23 pp. W. Konold, R. Böcker, U. Hampicke (Eds.).
66. Winkel G. Forstpolitik. Handbuch Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege 2007, 1-22. W. Konold, R. Böcker, U. Hampicke (Eds.).
67. Winkel G. Waldnaturschutzpolitik in Deutschland. Bestandsaufnahme, Analysen und Entwurf einer Story-Line 2007, Universität Freiburg.
68. Winkel G., Sotirov M. An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of new modes of governance in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 13(2):143-154.
69. Wondolleck J.M., Yaffee S.L. Making Collaboration Work. Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management 2000, Island Press, Washington, DC.
70. Our Common Future 1987, World Commission on Environment Development, Oxford University Press, New York.