Assessment: A boundary object linking professional education and work?

Balancing Dilemmas in Assessment and Learning in Contemporary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 101-114

  Havnes, Anton ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900840726     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203942185     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 46-69.
3. Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström, (Eds.), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 39-61.
4. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 361-363.
5. Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insight into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.) Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Blakeslee, A. M. (2001). Bridging the workplace and the academy: Teaching professional genres through classroom-workplace collaboration. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 169-192.
7. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22 (2), 151-167.
8. Bowden, F. & Marton, J. (1997). The university of learning. Beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page
9. Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
11. Davidov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
13. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
14. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1996). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319-336.
15. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 15-46. New York: Macmillan
18. Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning. An activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 159-76.
20. Heggen, K. (1995). Sykehuset som 'klasserom': praksisopplæring i profesjon-sutdanninger. [The hospital as 'classroom'. Work practice in professional education.] Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
21. Knight, P. T. M. & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. London: Open University Press.
22. Kvale, S. (1993). Examination re-examined: Certification of students or certification of knowledge. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kvale, S. (1996). Assessment as construction of knowledge. In R. Hayhoe & J. Pan (Eds.), East-west dialogue knowledge and higher education. New York: Sharpe, 117-140.
24. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Russel, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society. An activity theoretical analysis, Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
27. Säljö, R. (2003). Epilogue: From transfer to boundary-crossing. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström, (Eds.), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 311-321.
28. Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 56, 411-436.
30. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translational' and boundary objects. Social Studies of Sciences, 19, 387-420.
31. Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (Eds.) (2003). Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1976). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models: Representation and scientific understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.
34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.