Examination and learning: An activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 159-176

  Havnes, Anton ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747345847     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293042000188456     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baune, Ø. (1991) Vitenskap og metode [Science and method] (7th edn) (Oslo, published privately).
2. Baune, Ø. (1993a) Språk, logikk og argumentasjonsteori [Language, logic and theory of argumentation] (7th edn) (Oslo, published privately).
3. Baune, Ø. (1993b) Veiledning i oppgaveløsning [Guide to problem solving] (Oslo, Temagruppe A & B).
4. Biggs, J. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. A role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education, 5(1), 103-110.
5. Cole, M. (1996) Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
6. Crooks, T. J. (1988) The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students, Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
7. Cuban, A. P. (1992) Curriculum stability and change, in: P. W. Jackson (Ed.) Handbook on curriculum (New York, Macmillan), 216-247.
8. Elton, L. & Laurillard, D. (1979) Trends in student learning, Studies in Higher Education, 4, 87-102.
9. Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit Oy).
10. Engeström, Y. (2000) Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work, Ergonomics 2000, 43(7), 960-974.
11. Engeström, Y. & Miettinen, R. (1999) Introduction, in: Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R. L. Punamäki (Eds) Perspectives on activity theory (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 1-16.
12. Føllestad, D., Walløe, L. & Elster, J. (1985) Logikk, språk og vitenskapsteori, 2. utgave [Logic, language and philosophy of science] (3rd edn) (Oslo, Scandinavian University Press).
13. Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception (Boston, MA, Mifflin).
14. Havnes, A. (1996) Læring som sosial praksis. Examen philosophicum som eksempel [Learning as a social practice. Examen Philosophicum as an example], in: O. Dysthe, Ulike perspektiver på læring og læringsforskning (Oslo, Cappelen Academic Publishers), 136-173.
15. Havnes, A. (1997) Agency in learning. A case study of learning at university. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Institute for Educational Research, University of Oslo.
16. Heggen, K. (1995) Sykehus som 'klasserom' [The hospital as 'classroom'] (Oslo, Scandinavian University Press).
17. Jackson, P. W. (1968) Life in classrooms (New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston).
18. Lauvaas, P., Havnes, A. & Raaheim, A. (2001) Why this inertia in the development of better assessment methods, Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), 91-100.
19. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
20. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978) Subject, object, cognition (Moscow, Progress).
21. Shepard, L. (2000) The role of assessment in a learning culture, Educational Researcher, 29(7), 1-14.
22. Stigen, A. (1990) Om målsettingen for Examen philosophicum [On the intentions of Examen Philosophicum], in: H. F. Skram & E. Viestad (Eds) Hjelpehåndbok i filosofihistorie til Examen philosophicum (Oslo, Scandinavian University Press), 71-72.
23. Säljö, R. (2000) Lärande i Praktiken [Learning in practice] (Stockholm, Liber).
24. University of Oslo (1993) Curriculum guide for Examen Philosophicum (Oslo, University of Oslo).
25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
26. Wormnæs, O. (1987) Vitenskapsfilosofi [Philosophy of science] (Oslo, Gyldendal).