Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make?

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 569-580

  Boyack, Kevin W ^a   Klavans, Richard ^a  

^a SciTech Strategies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Books; Direct citation; Non source documents; Science mapping

Indexed keywords

BOOKS; CONFERENCE PAPERS; DIRECT CITATION; NON-SOURCE DOCUMENTS; RESEARCH EVALUATION; WORKING PAPERS;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 84900819642     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bollen J., Van de Sompel H., Hagberg A., Bettencourt L., Chute R., Rodriguez M., et al. Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(3):e4803.
2. Börner K., Klavans R., Patek M., Zoss A.M., Biberstine J.R., Light R.P., et al. Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(7):e39464.
3. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2014, 65(4):670-685. 10.1002/asi.22990.
4. Butler L., Visser M.S. Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics 2006, 66(2):327-343.
5. Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(3):359-377.
6. Chen C., Ibekwe-SanJuan F., Hou J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(7):1386-1409.
7. Chen C., Kuljis J. The rising landscape: A visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(5):435-446.
8. Chi P.-S. Do non-source items make a difference in the social sciences?. 14th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics 2013, 612-625. J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, H. Moed (Eds.).
9. Franceschini F., Maisano D. Structured evaluation of the scientific output of academic research groups by recent h-based indicators. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5:64-74.
10. Garfield E. Historiographs, librarianship, and the history of science. Toward a theory of librarianship: Papers in honor of Jesse Hauk Shera 1973, 380-402. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ. C.H. Rawski (Ed.).
11. Hicks D. The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics 1999, 44(2):193-215.
12. Hicks D. The four literatures of the social science. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems 2004, 473-495. Springer, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
13. Huang M., Chang Y. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(11):1819-1828.
14. Kousha K., Thelwall M., Rezaie S. Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(11):2147-2164.
15. Leydesdorff L. Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences?. Journal of Documentation 2003, 59:84-104.
16. Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(2):278-287.
17. Martin S., Brown W.M., Klavans R., Boyack K.W. OpenOrd: An open-source toolbox for large graph layout. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 2011, 7868:786806.
18. Moed H. Citation analysis in research evaluation 2005, Springer, Dordrecht.
19. Nederhof A.J. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and humanities: A review. Scientometrics 2006, 66(1):81-100.
20. Nederhof A.J., van Leeuwen T.N., van Raan A.F.J. Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: A first exploration. Scientometrics 2010, 83:363-374.
21. Noyons E.C.M., Calero-Medina C. Applying bibliometrics mapping in a high level science policy context: Mapping the research areas of three Dutch Universities of Technology. Scientometrics 2009, 79(2):261-275.
22. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1973, 24:265-269.
23. Tijssen R.J.W., van Leeuwen T.N. On generalising scientometric journal mapping beyond ISI's journal and citation databases. Scientometrics 1995, 33(1):93-116.
24. van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84(2):523-538.
25. van Leeuwen T.N. The application of bibliometric analysis in the evaluation of social science research: Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics 2006, 66(1):133-154.
26. Waltman L., Van Eck N.J. A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63(12):2378-2392.
27. White H.D., Griffith B.C. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981, 32(3):163-171.
28. Zuccala A., Guns R. Comparing book citations in humanities journals to library holdings: Scholarly use versus perceived cultural benefit. 14th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics 2013, 353-360. J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, H. Moed (Eds.).