Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 670-685

  Boyack, Kevin W ^a   Klavans, Richard ^a  

^a SciTech Strategies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLINGS; EMERGING TOPICS; GLOBAL MODELING; HIGH-LEVEL STRUCTURE; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; RESEARCH EVALUATION; RESEARCH PLANNING; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84899554030     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22990     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
2. Börner, K., Boyack, K.W., Milojević, S., & Morris, S. (2012). An introduction to modeling science: Basic model types, key definitions, and a general framework for the comparison of process models. In A. Scharnhorst, P. van den Besselaar, & K. Börner (Eds.), Understanding complex systems (pp. 3-22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Börner, K., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Zoss, A.M., Biberstine, J.R., Light, R.P., et al. (2012). Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e39464.
4. Boyack, K.W. (2009). Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations. Scientometrics, 79(1), 27-44.
5. Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
6. Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2011). Multiple dimensions of journal specificity: Why journals can't be assigned to disciplines. 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 123-133.
7. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
8. Boyack, K.W., Newman, D., Duhon, R.J., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Biberstine, J.R., et al. (2011). Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: Comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches. PLoS One, 6(3), e18029.
9. Chen, C., Chen, Y., Horowitz, M., Hou, H., Liu, Z., & Pelligrino, D. (2009). Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 191-209.
10. Franklin, J.J., & Johnston, R. (1988). Co-citation bibliometric modeling as a tool for S&T policy and R&D management: Issues, applications, and developments. In A.F.J. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 325-389). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.
11. Garfield, E., Malin, M.V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, & H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Griffith, B.C., Small, H.G., Stonehill, J.A., & Dey, S. (1974). Structure of scientific literatures. 2. Toward a macrostructure and microstructure for science. Science Studies, 4(4), 339-365.
13. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2006). Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 475-499.
14. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455-476.
15. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2010). Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership. Scientometrics, 82(3), 539-553.
16. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2011). Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1-18.
17. Klavans, R., Boyack, K.W., & Small, H. (2012). Indicators and precursors of "hot science." In 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 475-487). Montreal, Canada.
18. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362.
19. Lin, J. (1991). Divergence measures based on Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1), 145-151.
20. Lin, J., & Wilbur, W.J. (2007). PubMed related articles: A probabilistic topic-based model for content similarity. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 423.
21. Martin, B.R., Nightingale, P., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2012). Science and technology studies: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1182-1204.
22. Martin, S., Brown, W.M., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2011). Open Ord: An open-source toolbox for large graph layout. Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 7868, 786-806.
23. Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Morris, S.A., & Martens, B.V. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 213-295.
25. Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871-1887.
26. Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
27. Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8(5/6), 321-340.
28. Small, H., Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2013). Identifying emerging topics by combining direct citation and co-citation. In 14th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Vienna, Austria.
29. Spärck Jones, K., Walker, S., & Robertson, S.E. (2000a). A probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and comparative experiments. Part 1. Information Processing & Management, 36(6), 779-808.
30. Spärck Jones, K., Walker, S., & Robertson, S.E. (2000b). A probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and comparative experiments. Part 2. Information Processing & Management, 36(6), 809-840.
31. van Raan, A.F.J. (2005). Reference-based publication networks with episodic memories. Scientometrics, 63(3), 549-566.
32. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392.
33. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E.C.M., Tijssen, R.J.W., van Eck, N.J., et al. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419-2432.
34. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
35. Zitt, M. (2010). Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 392-406.