Investigating the accessibility of state government web sites in Maryland

Designing Inclusive Interactions: Inclusive Interactions Between People and Products in Their Contexts of Use

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 69-78

  Lazar, J ^a   Beavan, P ^a   Brown, J ^a   Coffey, D ^a   Nolf, B ^a   Poole, R ^a   Turk, R ^a   Waith, V ^a   Wall, T ^a   Weber, K ^a   Wenger, B ^a  

^a TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900551534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-166-0_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bailey J, Burd (2005) Web accessibility evolution in the United Kingdom. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution (WSE 2005), Budapest, Hungary.
2. Bertot J, Jaeger P (2006) User-centered e-government: challenges and benefits for government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2): 163-168.
3. Chen Y, Chen Y, Shao M (2005) Accessibility diagnosis on the government web sites in Taiwan, R.O.C. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A 2006), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
4. Fagen J, Fagen B (2004) An accessibility study of state legislative web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1): 65-85.
5. Freire A, Bittar T, Fortes R (2008) An approach based on metrics for monitoring web accessibility in Brazilian municipalities web sites. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Ceará, Brazil.
6. Goette T, Collier C, Whilte J (2006) An exploratory study of the accessibility of state government web sites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(1): 41-50.
7. Hackett S, Parmento B, Zeng X (2004) Accessibility of internet websites through time. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2004), Atlanta, GA, US.
8. Jaeger P (2006) Assessing section 508 compliance on federal e-government websites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2): 169-190.
9. Kane S, Shulman J, Shockley T, Ladner R (2007) A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A 2007), Banff, Alberta, Canada.
10. Lazar J, Beere P, Greenidge K, Nagappa Y (2003) Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: A study of 50 web sites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2(4): 331-341.
11. Lazar J, Dudley-Sponaugle A, Greenidge K (2004) Improving web accessibility: A study of webmaster perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2): 269-288.
12. Lazar J, Greenidge K (2006) One year older, but not necessarily wiser: An evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(4): 285-291.
13. Loiacono E, McCoy S (2004) Web site accessibility: An online sector analysis. Information Technology and People, 17(1): 87-101.
14. Mankoff J, Fait H, Tran T (2005) Is your web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), Portland, OR, US.
15. Paris M (2006) Website accessibility: A survey of local e-government web sites and legislation in Northern Ireland. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(4): 292- 299.
16. Shah B, Shakya S (2007) Evaluating the web accessibility of websites of the central government of Nepal. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of eElectronic Governance (ICEGOV 2007), Macao, China.
17. Sullivan T, Matson R (2000) Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the web's most popular sites. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability, Arlington, VA, US.