Improving web accessibility: A study of webmaster perceptions

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 269-288

  Lazar, Jonathan ^a   Dudley Sponaugle, Alfreda ^a   Greenidge, Kisha Dawn ^a  

^a TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; LEARNING AIDS FOR HANDICAPPED PERSONS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WEB BROWSERS;

LEARNING DISABILITIES; POINTING DEVICES; SCREEN READING; WEB ACCESSIBILITY;

WEBSITES;

EID: 1142291796     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ceaparu I., Shneiderman B. Improving Web-based civic information access. a case study of the 50 US States Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society. 2002;275-282.
2. Dudley-Sponaugle A., Lazar J. The ethical implications of web accessibility for users with disabilities. Proceedings of the Information Resource Management Association 2003 International Conference. 2003;109-111.
3. Ivory M., Mankoff J., Le A. Using automated tools to improve web site usage by users with diverse abilities. IT and Society. 1(3):2003;195-236.
4. Johnson D. Computer ethics. 3rd ed. 2001;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
5. Lazar J. Integrating accessibility into the information systems curriculum. Proceedings of the International Association for Computer Information Systems. 2002;373-379.
6. Lazar J., Beere P., Greenidge K., Nagappa Y. Web accessibility in the mid-Atlantic United States. a study of 50 web sites Universal Access in the Information Society. 2(4):2003;1-11.
7. Lazar, J., Greenidge, K. (2003). One year older, but not necessarily wiser: an evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time (under review).
8. Lazar J., Preece J. Designing and implementing web-based surveys. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 39(4):1999;63-67.
9. Lazar J., Preece J. Using electronic surveys to evaluate networked resources: from idea to implementation. McClure C., Bertot J. Evaluating networked information services: techniques, policy, and issues. 2001;137-154 Information Today, Medford, NJ.
10. Paciello M. Web accessibility for people with disabilities. 2000;CMP Books, Lawrence, KS.
11. Pence G. A dictionary of common philosophical terms. 2000;The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
12. Sharff R., Dusek V. Philosophy of technology: the technological condition. 2003;Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
13. Shneiderman B. Universal usability. pushing human-computer interaction research to empower every citizen Communications of the ACM. 43(5):2000;84-91.
14. Slatin J., Rush S. Maximum accessibility. 2003;Addison-Wesley, New York.
15. Spinello R. CyberEthics: morality and law in cyberspace. 2nd ed. 2003;Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA.
16. Stowers, G. (2002). The state of federal web sites: the pursuit of excellence. Available at: http:// endowment.pwcglobal.com/pdfs/StowersReport0802.pdf.
17. Sullivan T., Matson R. Barriers to use. usability and content accessibility on the web's most popular sites Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability. 2000;139-144.
18. Tavani, H. (2004). Ethics technology: ethical issues in an age of information and communication technology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.