The QSPR-THESAURUS: The online platform of the CADASTER project

ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 13-24

  Brandmaier, Stefan ^a   Peijnenburg, Willie ^b,c   Durjava, Mojca K ^d   Kolar, Boris ^d   Gramatica, Paola ^e   Papa, Ester ^e   Bhhatarai, Barun ^e   Kovarich, Simona ^e   Cassani, Stefano ^e   Roy, Partha Pratim ^e   Rahmberg, Magnus ^f   Öberg, Tomas ^g   Jeliazkova, Nina ^h   Golsteijn, Laura ⁱ   Comber, Mike ^j   Charochkina, Larisa ^k   Novotarskyi, Sergii ^l   Sushko, Iurii ^l   Abdelaziz, Ahmed ^l   D'Onofrio, Elisa ^a,e   Kunwar, Prakash ^a   Ruggiu, Fiorella ^a   Tetko, Igor V ^a,l,m   more..

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d Environmental Protection Institute   (Slovenia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^f IVL SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^g LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^h IDEACONSULT LTD   (Bulgaria)

ⁱ RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^j Mike Comber Consulting Ltd Devon   (United Kingdom)

^k INSTITUTE OF BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY AND PETROCHEMISTRY   (Ukraine)

^l EADMET GmbH   (Germany)

^m KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

more..

Author keywords

CADASTER; Fate assessment; Hazard assessment; Multimedia models; Online tools

Indexed keywords

BENZOTRIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; FRAGRANCE; MUSK; POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; COMPUTER MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; WEB BROWSER;

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; INTERNET; LINEAR MODELS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84900526209     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119291404200104     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. European Parliament (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Reg - istration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L396, 30.12.2006, 1-849.
2. Peijnenburg, W. & Tetko, I. V. (2013). Exemplifi - cation of the implementation of alternatives to experimental testing in chemical risk assessment - case studies from within the CADASTER project. ATLA 41, 13-17.
3. CADASTER (undated). QSPR-THESAURUS Online Platform. Available at: http://qspr-thesaurus.eu/(Accessed 04.01.14).
4. Sushko, I., Novotarskyi, S., Körner, R., Pandey, A. K., Rupp, M., Teetz, W., Brandmaier, S., Abdelaziz, A., Prokopenko, V. V., Tanchuk, V. Y., Todeschini, R., Varnek, A., Marcou, G., Ertl, P., Potemkin, V., Grishina, M., Gasteiger, J., Schwab, C., Baskin, I. I., Palyulin, V. A., Radchenko, E. V., Welsh, W. J., Kholodovych, V., Chekmarev, D., Cherkasov, A., Aires-de-Sousa, J., Zhang, Q. Y., Bender, A., Nigsch, F., Patiny, L., Williams, A., Tkachenko, V. & Tetko, I. V. (2011). Online Chemical Modeling Environment (OCHEM): Web platform for data storage, model development and publishing of chemical information. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 25, 533-554.
5. Aldenberg, T. & Rorije, E. (2013). Species sensitivity distribution estimation from uncertain (QSARbased) effects data. ATLA 41, 19-31.
6. Brandmaier, S., Sahlin, U., Tetko, I. V. & Öberg, T. (2012). PLS-Optimal: A stepwise D-optimal design based on latent variables. Journal of Chemical Inf - ormation & Modeling 52, 975-983.
7. Brandmaier, S., Tetko, I. V. & Öberg, T. (2012). An evaluation of experimental design in QSAR modelling utilizing the K-medoid clustering. Journal of Chemometrics 26, 509-517.
8. Brandmaier, S. & Tetko, I. V. (2013). Robustness in experimental design: A study on the reliability of selection approaches. Computational & Structural Biotechnology Journal 7.
9. JRC (2014). QSAR Reporting Formats and JRC (Q) SAR Model Inventory. Ispra, Italy: Institute for Health and Consumer Protection (JRC-IHCP). Available at: http://ihcp. jrc.ec.europa.eu/our-labs/predictive-toxicology/qsar-tools/QRF (Accessed 04. 01.14).
10. CADASTER (undated). Tutorial on Model Upload to QSPR-THESAURUS Web Using JRC Models. Available at: http://www.cadaster.eu/node/118 (Acc - essed 05.01.14).
11. JRC (undated). (Q) SAR Model Reporting Format Inventory. Available at: http://qsardb.jrc.it/qmrf/(Acc - essed 05.01.14).
12. Anon. (2012). Model Uploader. Available at: http://wiki.cadaster.eu/ index.php/Model-uploader (Acc - essed 05.01.14).
13. Sushko, I., Novotarskyi, S., Körner, R., Pandey, A. K., Kovalishyn, V. V., Prokopenko, V. V. & Tetko, I. V. (2010). Applicability domain for in silico models to achieve accuracy of experimental measurements. Journal of Chemometrics 24, 202-208.
14. Tetko, I. V., Sushko, I., Pandey, A. K., Zhu, H., Tropsha, A., Papa, E., Oberg, T., Todeschini, R., Fourches, D. & Varnek, A. (2008). Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: Focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling 48, 1733-1746.
15. Tetko, I. V., Bruneau, P., Mewes, H.-W., Rohrer, D. C. & Poda, G. I. (2006). Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions? Drug Discovery Today 11, 700-707.
16. Roy, P. P., Kovarich, S. & Gramatica, P. (2011). QSAR model reproducibility and applicability: A case study of rate constants of hydroxyl radical reaction models applied to polybrominated diphenyl ethers and (benzo-) triazoles. Journal of Comput - ational Chemistry 32, 2386-2396.
17. Sushko, I., Novotarskyi, S., Körner, R., Pandey, A. K., Cherkasov, A., Li, J., Gramatica, P., Hansen, K., Schroeter, T., Müller, K.-R., Xi, L., Liu, H., Yao, X., Öberg, T., Hormozdiari, F., Dao, P., Sahinalp, C., Todeschini, R., Polishchuk, P., Artemenko, A., Kuz'min, V., Martin, T. M., Young, D. M,. Fourches, D., Muratov, E., Tropsha, A., Baskin, I., Horvath, D., Marcou, G., Muller, C., Varnek, A., Prokopenko, V. V. & Tetko, I. V. (2010). Applicability domains for classification problems: Benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling 50, 2094-2111.
18. Gramatica, P., Cassani, S., Roy, P. P., Kovarich, S., Yap, C. W. & Papa, E. (2012). QSAR modeling is not 'push a button and find a correlation': A case study of toxicity of (benzo-) triazoles on algae. Molecular Informatics 31, 817-835.
19. OECD (2004). OECD Principles for the Validation, for Regulatory Purposes, of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship Models, 2pp. Paris, France: 37th Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/ 37849783.pdf (Accessed 05.01.14).
20. Anon. (2011). StandaloneAccess. Available at: http://wiki.ochem.eu/w/ StandaloneAccess (Accessed 05. 01.14).
21. De Aguiar, P. F., Bourguignon, B., Khots, M. S., Massart, D. L. & Phan-Than-Luu, R. (1995). Doptimal designs. Chemometrics & Intelligent Labor - atory Systems 30, 199-210.
22. Anon. (2012). Welcome to OCHEM. Available at: http://wiki.ochem.eu/w/ Main-Page (Accessed 05.01. 14).
23. Posthuma, L., Traas, T. P. & Suter, G. W. I. (2002). Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology, 616pp. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis Publishers.
24. Aldenberg, T. & Slob, W. (1993). Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety 25, 48-63.
25. Sahlin, U. (2013). Uncertainty in QSAR predictions. ATLA 41, 111-125.
26. Sahlin, U., Golsteijn, L., Iqbal, M. S. & Peijnenburg, W. (2013). Arguments for considering QSAR uncertainty in hazard and risk assessments. ATLA 41, 91-110.
27. Aldenberg, T. & Jaworska, J. S. (2000). Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Eco - toxicology & Environmental Safety 46, 1-18.
28. Tetko, I. V., Sopasakis, P., Kunwar, P., Brandmaier, S., Novotarskyi, S., Charochkina, L., Prokopenko, V. & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2013). Prioritisation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) by using the QSPR-THESAURUS web tool. ATLA 41, 127-135.
29. Cassani, S., Kovarich, S., Papa, E., Roy, P. P., Rahmberg, M., Nilsson, S., Sahlin, U., Jeliazkova, N., Kochev, N., Pukalov, O., Tetko, I., Brandmaier, S., Durjava, M. K., Kolar, B., Peijnenburg, W. & Gramatica, P. (2013). Evaluation of CADASTER QSAR models for the aquatic toxicity of (benzo) triazoles and prioritisation by consensus prediction. ATLA 41, 49-64.
30. Cassani, S., Kovarich, S., Papa, E., Roy, P. P., Van Der Wal, L. & Gramatica, P. (2013). Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo) triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies Quantitative Activity-Activity modelling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 258-259, 50-60.
31. Den Hollander, H., Van Eijkeren, J. & Van De Meent, D. (2004). SimpleBox 3.0: Multimedia Mass Balance Model for Evaluating the Fate of Chemicals in the Environment. Report No. 601200003, 155pp. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
32. Sarfraz Iqbal, M., Golsteijn, L., Öberg, T., Sahlin, U., Papa, E., Kovarich, S. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2013). Understanding Quantitative Structure-Property relationships uncertainty in environmental fate modeling. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry 32, 1069-1076.
33. Rorije, E., Aldenberg, T. & Peijnenburg, W. (2013). Read-across estimates of aquatic toxicity for selected fragrances. ATLA 41, 77-90.
34. CADASTER (undated). Deliverables. Available at: http://ecoitn. eu/node/110 (Accessed 05.01.14).
35. Ding, G.-H., Frömel, T., Van Den Brandhof, E.-J., Baerselman, R. & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2012). Acute toxicity of poly- and perfluorinated compounds to two cladocerans, Daphnia magna and Chydorus sphaericus. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry 31, 605-610.
36. Ding, G., Wouterse, M., Baerselman, R. & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2012). Toxicity of polyfluorinated and perfluorinated compounds to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and green algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata). Archives of Environmental Contamin - ation & Toxicology 62, 49-55.
37. Ding, G. & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2013). Physico - chemical properties and aquatic toxicity of polyand perfluorinated compounds. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology 43, 598-678.
38. Mansouri, K., Consonni, V., Durjava, M. K., Kolar, B., Öberg, T. & Todeschini, R. (2012). Assessing bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers for aquatic species by QSAR modeling. Chemo - sphere 89, 433-444.
39. Durjava, M. K., Kolar, B., Arnus, L., Papa, E., Kovarich, S., Sahlin, U. & Peijnenburg, W. (2013). Experimental assessment of the environmental fate and effects of triazoles and benzotriazole. ATLA 41, 65-75.
40. Mojca Durjava, M. K., Kolar, B. & Peijnenburg, W. (2012). Overview of New Data Generated (Deliv - erable 2.5). Available at: http://www.cadaster. eu/sites/cadaster.eu/files/data/deliverable/public/Deliverable2.5.pdf (Accessed 14.03.14).
41. Bhhatarai, B. & Gramatica, P. (2010). Per- and polyfluoro toxicity (LC50 inhalation) study in rat and mouse using QSAR modeling. Chemical Research in Toxicology 23, 528-539.
42. Bhhatarai, B., Teetz, W., Liu, T., Öberg, T., Jeliazkova, N., Kochev, N., Pukalov, O., Tetko, I. V., Kovarich, S., Papa, E. & Gramatica, P. (2011). CADASTER QSPR models for predictions of melting and boiling points of perfluorinated chemicals. Molecular Informatics 30, 189-204.
43. Bhhatarai, B. & Gramatica, P. (2011). Prediction of aqueous solubility, vapor pressure and critical micelle concentration for aquatic partitioning of perfluorinated chemicals. Environmental Science & Technology 45, 8120-8128.
44. Bhhatarai, B. & Gramatica, P. (2011). Modelling physico-chemical properties of (benzo) triazoles, and screening for environmental partitioning. Water Research 45, 1463-1471.
45. Bhhatarai, B. & Gramatica, P. (2011). Oral LD50 toxicity modeling and prediction of per- and polyfluorinated chemicals on rat and mouse. Molecular Diversity 15, 467-476.
46. Papa, E., Kovarich, S. & Gramatica, P. (2009). Development, validation and inspection of the applicability domain of QSPR models for physicochemical properties of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 28, 790-796.
47. Papa, E., Kovarich, S. & Gramatica, P. (2011). On the use of local and global QSPRs for the prediction of physico-chemical properties of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Molecular Informatics 30, 232-240.
48. Öberg, T. & Liu, T. (2011). Extension of a prediction model to estimate vapor pressures of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs). Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems 107, 59-64.
49. Papa, E., Kovarich, S. & Gramatica, P. (2010). QSAR modeling and prediction of the endocrine-disrupting potencies of brominated flame retardants. Chemical Research in Toxicology 23, 946-954.
50. Kovarich, S., Papa, E. & Gramatica, P. (2011). QSAR classification models for the prediction of endocrine disrupting activity of brominated flame retardants. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190, 106-112.
51. Kovarich, S., Papa, E., Li, J. & Gramatica, P. (2012). QSAR classification models for the screening of the endocrine-disrupting activity of perfluorinated compounds. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research 23, 207-220.
52. Papa, E., Luini, M. & Gramatica, P. (2009). Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship modelling of oral acute toxicity and cytotoxic activity of fragrance materials in rodents. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research 20, 767-779.
53. Papa, E., Kovarich, S. & Gramatica, P. (2013). QSAR prediction of the competitive interaction of emerging halogenated pollutants with human trans - thyretin. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research 24, 333-349.
54. Chirico, N. & Gramatica, P. (2011). Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling 51, 2320-2335.
55. Chirico, N. & Gramatica, P. (2012). Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling 52, 2044-2058.
56. Golsteijn, L., Iqbal, M. S., Cassani, S., Hendriks, H. W. M., Kovarich, S., Papa, E., Rorije, E., Sahlin, U. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2014). Assessing predictive uncertainty in comparative toxicity potentials of triazoles. Environmental Toxicology & Chem istry 33, 293-301.
57. CADASTER (undated). MOPAC. Available at: http://cadaster.eu/mopac/ (Accessed 06.01.14).
58. Anderson, D. P. (2004). BOINC: A System for Publicresource Computing and Storage. Proceedings Fifth IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 4-10.
59. Stewart, J. J. P. (1990). MOPAC: A semiempirical molecular orbital program. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 4, 1-103.
60. Brandmaier, S., Novotarskyi, S., Sushko, Y. & Tetko, I. V. (2013). From descriptors to predicted properties: Experimental design by using applicability domain estimation. ATLA 41, 33-47.
61. Birnbaum, L. & Staskal, D. (2004). Brominated flame retardants: Cause for concern? Environ - mental Health Perspectives 112, 9-17.
62. Tetko, I. (2012). The perspectives of computational chemistry modeling. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 26, 135-136.