Exemplification of the implementation of alternatives to experimental testing in chemical risk assessment - Case studies from the cadaster project

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 13-17

  Peijnenburg, Willie J G M ^a,b   Tetko, Igor V ^c,d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^d EADMET GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ANIMAL TESTING REDUCTION; ANIMAL TESTING REFINEMENT; ANIMAL TESTING REPLACEMENT; COMPUTER MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84877155424     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119291304100104     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. European Parliament (2006).Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration Evaluation Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) establishing a European Chemicals Agency amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC 93/67/EEC 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.Official Journal of the European Union L396 30.12.2006 1-849.
2. Bradbury S.P.Feijtel T.C.Van Leeuwen C.J.(2004).Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context.Environmental Science Technology 38 463A-470A.
3. Van Leeuwen C.J.Bro-Rasmussen F.Feijtel T.C.Arndt R.Bussian B.M.Calamari D.Glynn P.Grandy N.J.Hansen B.Van Hemmen J.J.Hurst P.King N.Koch R.Muller M.Solbe J.F.Speijers G.A.Vermeire T.(1996).Risk assessment and management of new and existing chemicals.Environmental Toxicology Pharmacology 2 243-299.
4. Durjava M.K.Kolar B.Arnus L.Papa E.Kovarich S.Sahlin U.Peijnenburg W.(2013).Experimental assessment of the environmental fate and effects of triazoles and benzotriazoles.ATLA 41 65-75.
5. Brandmaier S.Novotarskyi S.Sushko I.Tetko I.V.(2013).From descriptors to predicted properties: Experimental design using the applicability domain estimation.ATLA 41 33-47.
6. Cassani S.Kovarich S.Papa E.Roy P.Rahmberg M.Nilsson S.Sahlin U.Jeliazkova N.Kochev N.Pukalov O.Tetko I.V.Brandmaier S.Durjava M.K.Kolar B.Peijnenburg W.J.G.M.Gramatica P.(2013).Evaluation of CADASTER QSAR models for aquatic toxicity of (benzo)triazoles and prioritisation by consensus.ATLA 41 49-64.
7. Rorije E.Aldenberg T.Peijnenburg W.(2013) Read-across estimates of aquatic toxicity for selected fragrances.ATLA 41 77-90.
8. Sahlin U.Golsteijn L.Iqbal M.S.Peijnenburg W.(2013).Arguments for considering QSAR uncertainty in hazard and risk assessments.ATLA 41 91-110.
9. Sahlin U.(2013).Uncertainty in QSAR predictions.ATLA 41 111-125.
10. Aldenberg T.Rorije E.(2013).Species sensitivity distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data.ATLA 41 19-31.
11. Tetko I.V.Sopasakis P.Kunwar P.Brandmaier S.Novotarskyi S.Charochkina L.Prokopenko V.Peijnenburg W.J.G.M.(2013).Prioritisation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) by using the QSPR-THESAURUS web tool.ATLA 41 127-135.