The application of QSAR approaches to nanoparticles

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 43-50

  Ehret, Jacques ^a   Vijver, Martina ^b   Peijnenburg, Willie ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Nanoparticles; QSAR

Indexed keywords

NANOPARTICLE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DATA MINING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

DATA MINING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NANOPARTICLES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84900525955     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119291404200107     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anon. (2012). ASTM Standard E 2456-06(2012), 4pp. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM Inter - national.
2. Shevchenko, V. Y., Madison, A. E. & Mackay, A. L. (2003). The structural diversity of the nanoworld. Glass Physics & Chemistry 296, 577-582.
3. Maynard, A. D. & Aitken, R. J. (2007). Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities & future requirements. Nanotoxicology 11, 26-41.
4. Oberdörster, G., Maynard, A., Donaldson, K., Castranova, V., Fitzpatrick, J., Ausman, K., Carter, J., Karn, B., Kreyling, W., Lai, D., Olin, S., Monteiro-Riviere, N., Warheit, D. & Yang, H. (2005). Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: Elements of a screening strategy. Particle & Fibre Toxicology 28.
5. Todeschini, R. & Consoni, V. (2003). Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Volume 3, pp. 12. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
6. Livingstone, D. J. (ed.) (2008). Artificial Neural Networks: Methods & Applications, pp. 185-202. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press.
7. Ajay, A. (1993). A unified framework for using neural networks to build QSARs. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 36, 3565-3571.
8. Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector network. Machine Learning 203, 273-297.
9. Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In Systems Under Indirect Observation, Vol. 2(ed. K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold) pp. 1-54. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Ltd.
10. Wold, S. (1995). PLS for multivariate linear modeling. In Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, pp. 195-218. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
11. Clementi, S. & Wold, S. (1995). How to choose the proper statistical method. In Chemometrics Meth - ods in Molecular Design. pp. 319-336. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
12. Golbraikh, A. & Tropsha, A. (2002). Beware of q2! Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling 20, 269-276.
13. Nettleton, D. F., Orriols-Puig, A. & Fornells, A. (2010). A study of the effect of different types of noise on the precision of supervised learning technique. Artificial Intelligence Review 33, 275-306.
14. Hawkins, D. M. (2004). The problem of overfitting. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Sciences 44, 1-12.
15. Thomas, D. G., Pappu, R. V. & Baker, N. A. (2011). Nanoparticle ontology for cancer nanotechnology research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 441, 59-74.
16. Shaw, S. Y., Westly, E. C., Pittet, M. J., Subramanian, A., Schreiber, S. L. & Weissleder, R. (2008). Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activity. Applied Biological Science 10, 521, 7387-7392.
17. Fourches, D., Pu, D., Tassa, C., Weissleder, R., Shaw, S. Y., Mumper, R. & Tropsha, A. (2010). Quantit - ative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. ACS Nano 410, 5703-5712.
18. Anon. (undated). SMILES - A Simplified Chemical Language. Laguna Niguel, CA, USA: Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc. Available at: http://daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smil es.html (Accessed 10.03.14).
19. ® Handbook. Paisley, UK: Life Technologies. Available at: http://de-de.invitrogen.com/site/de/de/home/references/molecular- probesthehandbook.html/(Accessed 05.03.14).
20. RSC (2013). ChemSpider. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry. Available at: http://www.chemspider.com/(Accessed 20.12.13).
21. Mauri, A., Consonni, V., Pavan, M. & Todeschini, R. (2006). DRAGON software: An easy approach to molecular descriptor calculations. MATCH Comm - un ications in Mathematical & in Computer Chemistry 562, 237-248.
22. Yap, C. W. (2011). PaDEL-descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. Journal of Computational Chem - istry, 327, 1466-1474.
23. Hall, L. H. & Kier, L. B. (1995). Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Sciences 356, 1039-1045.
24. Hall, L. H., Kier, L. B. & Brown, B. B. (1995). Molecular similarity based on novel atom-type electrotopological state indices. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Sciences 356, 1074-1080.
25. Steinbeck, C., Han, Y., Kuhn, S., Horlacher, O., Luttmann, E. & Willighagen, E. L. (2003). The chemistry development kit (CDK): An open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Sciences, 432, 493-500.
26. Steinbeck, C., Hoppe, C., Kuhn, S., Floris, M., Guha, R. & Willighagen, E. L. (2006). Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK): An open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Sciences 1217, 2111-2120.
27. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P. & Witten, I. H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11, 10-18.
28. Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis & graphics. Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics 53, 299-314.