Controllability in protein interaction networks

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 19, 2014, Pages 7156-7160

  Wuchty, Stefan ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b University of Miami   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUB PROTEIN; MINIMUM DOMINATING SETS OF PROTEIN; PROTEIN DERIVATIVE; PROTEIN KINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; GENE INTERACTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; TUMOR GENE; VIRUS GENE;

DATABASES, GENETIC; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84900503465     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311231111     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Liu YY, Slotine JJ, Barabási AL (2011) Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473(7346):167-173.
2. Nacher J, Akutsu T (2012) Dominating scale-free networks with variable scaling exponent: Heterogeneous networks are not difficult to control. New J Phys 14(7): 073005-073028.
3. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411(6833):41-42.
4. Yu H, et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast inter-actome network. Science 322(5898):104-110.
5. Wuchty S, Almaas E (2005) Peeling the yeast protein network. Proteomics 5(2): 444-449.
6. Zotenko E, Mestre J, O'Leary DP, Przytycka TM (2008) Why do hubs in the yeast protein interaction network tend to be essential: Reexamining the connection between the network topology and essentiality. PLOS Comput Biol 4(8):e1000140.
7. Song J, Singh M (2013) From hub proteins to hub modules: The relationship between essentiality and centrality in the yeast interactome at different scales of organization. PLOS Comput Biol 9(2):e1002910.
8. Batada NN, Hurst LD, Tyers M (2006) Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins. PLOS Comput Biol 2(7):e88.
9. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296(5568):750-752.
10. Kar G, Gursoy A, Keskin O (2009) Human cancer protein-protein interaction network: A structural perspective. PLOS Comput Biol 5(12):e1000601.
11. Jonsson PF, Bates PA (2006) Global topological features of cancer proteins in the human interactome. Bioinformatics 22(18):2291-2297.
12. Das J, Yu H (2012) HINT: High-quality protein interactomes and their applications in understanding human disease. BMC Syst Biol 6:92.
13. Lehner B, Fraser AG (2004) A first-draft human protein-interaction map. Genome Biol 5(9):R63.
14. Higgins ME, Claremont M, Major JE, Sander C, Lash AE (2007) CancerGenes: A gene selection resource for cancer genome projects. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Database issue): D721-D726.
15. Zanzoni A, et al. (2002) MINT: A Molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett 513(1): 135-140.
16. Zhang R, Ou HY, Zhang CT (2004) DEG: A database of essential genes. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Database issue):D271-D272.
17. Ruepp A, et al. (2010) CORUM: The comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes-2009. Nucleic Acids Res 38(Database issue):D497-D501.
18. Pu S, Wong J, Turner B, Cho E, Wodak SJ (2009) Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 37(3):825-831.
19. Wuchty S, Siwo GH, Ferdig MT (2011) Shared molecular strategies of the malaria parasite P. falciparum and the human virus HIV-1. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(10):M111 009035.
20. Yu H, Kim PM, Sprecher E, Trifonov V, Gerstein M (2007) The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: Correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLOS Comput Biol 3(4):e59.
21. Costanzo M, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327(5964):425-431.
22. Stark C, et al. (2006) BioGRID: A general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Database issue):D535-D539.
23. Subramanian A, et al. (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(43):15545-15550.
24. Matys V, et al. (2006) TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: Transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Database issue):D108-D110.
25. Linding R, et al. (2007) Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 129(7):1415-1426.
26. Linding R, et al. (2008) NetworKIN: A resource for exploring cellular phosphorylation networks. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Database issue):D695-D699.
27. Abdulrehman D, et al. (2011) YEASTRACT: Providing a programmatic access to cu-rated transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a web services interface. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database issue):D136-D140.
28. Ptacek J, et al. (2005) Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 438(7068):679-684.
29. De Las Rivas J, Fontanillo C (2010) Protein-protein interactions essentials: Key concepts to building and analyzing interactome networks. PLOS Comput Biol 6(6): e1000807.
30. Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs. Pure Applied Mathematics (Marcel Dekker, New York).
31. Land AH, Doig AG (1960) An automatic method of solving discrete programming-problems. Econometrica 28(3):497-520.
32. Wuchty S, Siwo G, Ferdig MT (2010) Viral organization of human proteins. PLoS ONE 5(8):e11796.