Reasoned explanation and irs adjudication

Duke Law Journal

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1771-1834

  Johnson, Steve R ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900484218     PISSN: 00127086     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Peter L. Strauss, Overseers or "The Deciders"-The Courts in Administrative Law, 75 U. CHI. L. REV. 815, 817 (2008).
2. Richard E. Levy & Robert L. Glicksman, Agency-Specific Precedents, 89 TEX. L. REV. 499, 500 (2011)
3. Kristin E. Hickman, Agency-Specific Precedents: Rational Ignorance or Deliberate Strategy, 89 TEX. L. REV. SEE ALSO 89, 89 (2011)
4. Sidney A. Shapiro & Richard E. Levy, Heightened Scrutiny of the Fourth Branch: Separation of Powers and the Requirement of Adequate Reasons for Agency Decisions, 1987 DUKE L.J. 387, 388.
5. Patrick J. Smith, The APA's Reasoned- Explanation Rule and IRS Deficiency Notices, 134 TAX NOTES 331, 331 (2012)
6. Lawrence Zelenak, Should Courts Require the Internal Revenue Service To Be Consistent?, 40 TAX L. REV. 411, 411 (1985)
7. Robert L. Rabin, Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective, 38 STAN. L. REV. 1189
8. William H. Rodgers, Jr., Judicial Review of Risk Assessments: The Role of Decision Theory in Unscrambling the Benzene Decision, 11 ENVTL. L. 301, 302 (1981)
9. Henry Friendly, Chenery Revisited: Reflections on Reversal and Remand of Administrative Orders, 1969 DUKE L.J. 199, 224
10. Thomas J. Miles & Cass R. Sunstein, The Real World of Arbitrariness Review, 75 U. CHI. L. REV. 761, 814 (2008).
11. Craig Smith, Note, Taking "Due Account" of the APA's Prejudicial-Error Rule, 96 VA. L. REV. 1727 (2010).
12. Kevin M. Stack, The Constitutional Foundations of Chenery, 116 YALE L. J. 952 (2007).
13. Steve R. Johnson, Auer/Seminole Rock Deference in the Tax Court, 11 PITT. TAX REV. 1 (2013).
14. Catherine M. Sharkey, Federalism Accountability: "Agency-Forcing" Measures, 58 DUKE L.J. 2125, 2181 (2009)
15. William S. Jordan, III, Ossification Revisited: Does Arbitrary and Capricious Review Significantly Interfere with Agency Ability To Achieve Regulatory Goals Through Informal Rulemaking?, 94 NW. U. L. REV. 393, 440 (2000)
16. Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Probing the Mind of the Administrator: Hearing Variations and Standards of Judicial Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act and Other Federal Statutes, 75 COLUM. L. REV. 721, 723 n.18 (1975).
17. Frederick Schauer, Giving Reasons, 47 STAN. L. REV. 633, 633 (1995).
18. Jerry L. Mashaw, Reasoned Administration: The European Union, the United States, and the Project of Democratic Governance, 76 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 99 (2007)
19. Thomas O. Sargentich, The Critique of Active Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies: A Reevaluation, 49 ADMIN. L. REV. 599, 642 (1997)
20. Mark Seidenfeld, Demystifying Deossification: Rethinking Recent Proposals To Modify Judicial Review of Notice and Comment Rulemaking, 75 TEX. L. REV. 483, 510 (1997);
21. Joseph L. Sax, The (Unhappy) Truth About NEPA, 26 OKLA. L. REV. 239, 239 (1973)
22. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Role of Constitutional and Political Theory in Administrative Law, 64 TEX. L. REV. 469, 504-07 (1985).
23. Peter L. Strauss, Revisiting Overton Park: Political and Judicial Controls over Administrative Actions Affecting the Community, 39 UCLA L. REV. 1251 (1992).
24. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Is Standing Law or Politics?, 77 N.C. L. REV. 1741, 1746 (1999)
25. Sidney A. Shapiro & Richard W. Murphy, Eight Things Americans Can't Figure Out About Controlling Administrative Power, 61 ADMIN. L. REV. 5, 24-26 & n.80 (2009).
26. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Seven Ways To Deossify Agency Rulemaking, 47 ADMIN. L. REV. 59, 62-66 (1995);
27. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Two Problems in Administrative Law: Political Polarity on the District of Columbia Circuit and Judicial Deterrence of Agency Rulemaking, 1988 DUKE L.J. 300, 310
28. Michael Asimov, The Scope of Judicial Review of Decisions of California Administrative Agencies, 42 UCLA L. REV. 1157, 1238 (1995)
29. Steve R. Johnson, Unfinished Business on the Taxpayer Rights Agenda: Achieving Fairness in Transferee Liability Cases, 19 VA. TAX. REV. 403, 406-07 (2000).
30. Leandra Lederman, "Civil"izing Tax Procedure: Applying General Federal Learning to Statutory Notices of Deficiency, 30 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 183, 203 (1996)
31. Stephanie Hoffer, Hobgoblins of Little Minds No More: Justice Requires an IRS Duty of Consistency, 2006 UTAH L. REV. 317, 318-19
32. Timothy Jacobs, Barnes Group: Tax Court Turns Blind Eye to Ravenhorst, 140 TAX NOTES 481, 481 (2013)
33. Steve R. Johnson, An IRS Duty of Consistency: The Failure of Common Law Making and Proposed Legislative Solution, 77 TENN. L. REV. 563, 567-68 (2010)
34. Christine K. Lane, On-the-Record Review of CDP Determinations: An Examination of Policy Reasons Encouraging Judges To Stick to the Administrative Record, 6 FLA. ST. U. BUS. L. REV. 149 (2007).
35. Malvern B. Fink, Note, Effect of the Administrative Procedure Act on Decisions of the Tax Court, 2 TAX L. REV. 103 (1946).
36. Steve R. Johnson, Swallows as It Might Have Been: Regulations Revising Case Law, 112 TAX NOTES 773, 780-81 (2006).
37. Mary Ferrari, "Was Blind but Now I See" (Or What's Behind the Notice of Deficiency and Why Won't the Tax Court Look?), 55 ALB. L. REV. 407, 437-45 (1991)
38. James R. Repetti & Diane M. Ring, Horizontal Equity Revisited, 13 FLA. TAX REV. 135 (2012)
39. Amandeep S. Grewal, Legislative Entrenchment Rules in Tax Law, 62 ADMIN L. REV. 1011 (2010).
40. RICHARD J. PIERCE, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE § 11.1, at 772 (4th ed. 2002)
41. Paul L. Caron, Tax Myopia, or Mamas Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Tax Lawyers, 13 VA. TAX REV. 517, 518 (1994)
42. Kristin E. Hickman, The Need for Mead: Rejecting Tax Exceptionalism in Judicial Deference, 90 MINN. L. REV. 1537, 1542 (2006)