Problem Solving

The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Bassok, Miriam ^a   Novick, Laura R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagrams; Expertise; Gestalt; Insight; Math; Problem solving; Representation; Science; Search

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900466801     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0021     Document Type: Chapter

References (119)

1. Adams, J. L. (1979). Conceptual blockbusting: A guide to better ideas (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
2. Adelson, B. (1981). Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages. Memory and Cognition, 9, 422-433.
3. Alibali, M. W., Bassok, M., Solomon, K. O., Syc, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science, 10, 327-333.
4. Allard, F., & Starkes, J. L. (1991). Motor-skill experts in sports, dance, and other domains. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 126-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
6. Anzai, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124-140.
7. Atwood, M. E, & Polson, P.G. (1976). A process model for water jug problems. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 191-216.
8. Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1991). Visual information and valid reasoning. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 9-24). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
9. Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 99-134.
10. Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153-166.
11. Bassok, M., & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Object-based representations: Transfer between cases of continuous and discrete models of change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1522-1538.
12. Bassok, M., Pedigo, S. F., & Oskarsson, A. T. (2008). Priming addition facts with semantic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 343-352.
13. Bassok, M., Wu, L., & Olseth, L. K. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem solving transfer. Memory and Cognition, 23, 354-367.
14. Beilock, S. L. (2008). Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 339-343.
15. Birch, H. G. & Rabinowitz, H. S. (1951). The negative effect of previous experience on productive thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 122-126.
16. Blessing, S. B., & Ross, B. H. (1996). Content effects in problem categorization and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 792-810.
17. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 6, 435-440.
18. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 730-737.
19. Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 322-328.
20. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal-learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 355-376.
21. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
22. Chen, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2010). Enhancing acquisition of intuition versus planning in problem solving. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1875-1880). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
23. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
24. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
25. Clement, J., Lochhead, J., & Monk, G. S. (1981). Translation difficulties in learning mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 88, 286-290.
26. Coughlin, L. D., & Patel, V. L. (1987). Processing of critical information by physicians and medical students. Journal of Medical Education, 62, 818-828.
27. Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 343-363.
28. Deakin, J. M., & Allard, F. (1991). Skilled memory in expert figure skaters. Memory and Cognition, 19, 79-86.
29. Doumas, L. A. A., Bassok, M., Guthormsen, A., & Hummel, J. E. (2006). Theory of reflexive relational generalization. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1246-1250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), Analogy: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 58 (Whole No. 270). (Original work published 1935).
32. Durso, F. T., Rea, C. B., & Dayton, T. (1994). Graph-theoretic confirmation of restructuring during insight. Psychological Science, 5, 94-98.
33. Egan, D. E., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in the recall of symbolic drawings. Memory and Cognition, 7, 149-158.
34. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
35. Ernst, G. W., & Newell, A. (1969). GPS: A case study in generality and problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
36. Fisher, K. J., & Bassok, M. (2009). Analogical alignments in algebraic modeling. In B. Kokinov, D. Gentner, & K. J. Holyoak (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (pp. 137-144). Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University Press.
37. Fisher, K. J., Bassok, M., & Osterhout, L. (2010). When two plus two does not equal four: Event-related potential responses to semantically incongruous arithmetic word problems. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1571-1576). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
38. Fisher, K. J., Borchert, K., & Bassok, M. (2011). Following the standard form: Effects of equation format on algebraic modeling. Memory and Cognition, 39, 502-515.
39. Garber, P., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Gesture offers insight into problem solving in adults and children. Cognitive Science, 26, 817-831.
40. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. (1996). Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 159-163.
41. Goldstone, R. L., Landy, D. H., & Son, J. Y. (2010). The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 265-284.
42. Goldstone, R. L., & Sakamoto, J. Y. (2003). The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 414-466.
43. Greeno, J. G. (1974). Hobbits and orcs: Acquisition of a sequential concept. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 270-292.
44. Hardiman, P. T., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. P. (1989). The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among experts and novices. Memory and Cognition, 17, 627-638.
45. Haverty, L. A., Koedinger, K. R., Klahr, D., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Solving induction problems in mathematics: Not-so-trivial Pursuit. Cognitive Science, 24, 249-298.
46. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 2, pp. 21-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Hegarty, M., Canham, M. S., & Fabricant, S. I. (2010). Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 37-53.
48. Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students' eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 76-84.
49. Hinsley, D. A., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations: Meaning and representation in algebra word problems. In D. Hinsley, M. Just., & P. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 89-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 15, 332-340.
51. Jones, G. (2003). Testing two cognitive theories of insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1017-1027.
52. Jung-Beeman, M., & Bowden, E. M. (2000). The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be solved insight problems. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1231-1241.
53. Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R.,... Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLOS Biology, 2, 500-510.
54. Kellman, P. J. (2000). An update on Gestalt psychology. In B. Landau, J. Sabini, J. Jonides, & E. Newport (Eds.), Perception, cognition, and language: Essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman (pp. 157-190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Kellman, P. J., Massey, C. M., & Son, J. Y (2009). Perceptual learning modules in mathematics: Enhancing students' pattern recognition, structure extraction, and fluency. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 1-21.
56. Kellman, P. J., Massey, C., Roth, Z., Burke, T., Zucker, J., Saw, A.,... Wise, J. A. (2008). Perceptual learning and the technology of expertise. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16, 356-405.
57. Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 3-13.
58. Kindfield, A. C. H. (1993/1994). Biology diagrams: Tools to think with. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 1-36.
59. Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92, 109-129.
60. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1534-1555.
61. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1000-1009.
62. Kohler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Harcourt Brace.
63. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-294.
64. Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949-968.
65. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007a). Formal notations are diagrams: Evidence from a production task. Memory and Cognition, 35, 2033-2040.
66. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007b). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 720-733.
67. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317-345.
68. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
69. Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 363-371.
70. Lynch, M. (1990). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 153-186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 176-201.
72. Maier, N. (1930). Reasoning in humans. I. On direction. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10, 15-43.
73. Maier, N. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181-194.
74. Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Martin, S. A., & Bassok, M. (2005). Effects of semantic cues on mathematical modeling: Evidence from word-problem solving and equation construction tasks. Memory and Cognition, 33, 471-478.
76. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
77. Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329-339.
78. McKeithen, K. B., Reitman, J. S., Rueter, H. H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 307-325.
79. Medin, D. L., & Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, and after an impasse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 140-148.
81. Myles-Worsley, M., Johnston, W. A., & Simons, M. A (1988). The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 553-557.
82. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
83. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical enquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113-126.
84. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
85. Novick, L. R. (1995). Some determinants of successful analogical transfer in the solution of algebra word problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 5-30.
86. Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 197-223.
87. Novick, L. R., Catley, K. M., & Funk, D. J. (2010). Characters are key: The effect of synapomorphies on cladogram comprehension. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 539-547.
88. Novick, L. R., & Hmelo, C. E. (1994). Transferring symbolic representations across non-isomorphic problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1296-1321.
89. Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
90. Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy: That is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158-216.
91. Novick, L. R., Shade, C. K., & Catley, K. M. (2011). Linear versus branching depictions of evolutionary history: Implications for diagram design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 536-559.
92. Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2003). On the nature of insight solutions: Evidence from skill differences in anagram solution. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 351-382.
93. Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). The effects of superficial and structural information on on-line problem solving for good versus poor anagram solvers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1098-1120.
94. Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited I. Summary and critique of the Gestalt theory of problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 65-78.
95. Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 55, 269-282.
96. Ormerod, T. C., MacGregor, J. N., & Chronicle, E. P. (2002). Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 791-799.
97. Paige, J. M., & Simon, H. A. (1966). Cognitive processes in solving algebra word problems. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 51-119). New York: Wiley
98. Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., & Arocha, J. F. (1990). Medical expertise as a function of task difficulty. Memory and Cognition, 18, 394-406.
99. Patsenko, E. G., & Altmann, E. M. (2010). How planful is routine behavior? A selective attention model of performance in the Tower of Hanoi. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 95-116.
100. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
101. Posner, M. I. (1973). Cognition: An introduction. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
102. Reitman, W. R. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.
103. Richland, L. E., & McDonough, I. M. (2010), Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 28-43.
104. Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., & Stephens, D. L. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory and Cognition, 17, 759-769.
105. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem-solving performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 173-187.
106. Schoenfeld, A. H., & Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 484-494.
107. Schwartz, S. H. (1971). Modes of representation and problem solving: Well evolved is half solved. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 347-350.
108. Silver, E. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 195-210.
109. Silver, E. A. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 54-64.
110. Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
111. Simon, H. A. (1978). Information-processing theory of human problem solving. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5, pp. 271-295). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
112. Simon, H. A. (1986). The information processing explanation of Gestalt Phenomena. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 241-255.
113. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
114. Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2009). Fostering general transfer with specific simulations. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17, 1-42.
115. Thomas, J. C., Jr., (1974). An analysis of behavior in the hobbits-orcs problem. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 257-269.
116. Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of "fixation" in the solution of several "insight" problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 169-192.
117. Weiser, M., & Shertz, J. (1983). Programming problem representation in novice and expert programmers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19, 391-398.
118. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking (Rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
119. Winn, W. (1989). The design and use of instructional graphics. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 125-144). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier