Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 874-882

  Ortiz, H ^a   Ciga, M A ^b   Armendariz, P ^b   Kreisler, E ^c   Codina Cazador, A ^d   Gomez Barbadillo, J ^e   Garcia Granero, E ^f   Roig, J V ^g   Biondo, S ^c  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

^b BELLVITGE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE IDIBELL   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL JOSEP TRUETA   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO REINA SOFÍA   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^g HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANAL CANAL; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; RECTUM TUMOR; REOPERATION; STATISTICS; TUMOR RECURRENCE; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; ANAL CANAL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; REOPERATION; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84900464775     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9522     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC,. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 918-928.
2. Biondo S, Trenti L, Espín E, Frago R, Vallribera F, Jiménez LM, et al. [ Post-surgical complications and mortality after two-stage coloanal anastomosis using the Turnbull-Cutait procedure.] Cir Esp 2012; 90: 248-253.
3. Kennelly RP, Rogers AC, Winter DC,; Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group. Multicentre study of circumferential margin positivity and outcomes following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 160-166.
4. Påhlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Lindmark G, Sjödahl R, et al. The Swedish rectal cancer registry. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1285-1292.
5. Biondo S, Ortiz H, Lujan J, Codina-Cazador A, Espin E, Garcia-Granero E, et al. Quality of mesorectum after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer-results of an audited teaching programme in Spain. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 24-31.
6. den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L, Marijnen CA, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, et al. The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 1175-1183.
7. Anderin C, Martling A, Hellborg H, Holm T,. A population-based study on outcome in relation to the type of resection in low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 753-760.
8. Lange MM, Martz JE, Ramdeen B, Brooks V, Boachie-Adjei K, van de Velde CJ, et al. Long-term results of rectal cancer surgery with a systematical operative approach. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 1806-1815.
9. Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ,. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 53-56.
10. Mathis KL, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Huebner M, Haddock MG, et al. Outcomes following surgery without radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 137-143.
11. Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J,. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 232-238.
12. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P,; European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 588-599.
13. Dabbas N, Adams K, Chave H, Branagan G,. Current practice in abdominoperineal resection: an email survey of the membership of the Association of Coloproctology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012; 94: 173-176.
14. Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H,. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 1227-1240.
15. Beyond TME, Collaborative. Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1009-1014.
16. Asplund D, Haglind E, Angenete E,. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1191-1196.
17. Krishna A, Rickard MJ, Keshava A, Dent OF, Chapuis PH,. A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 57-65.
18. Messenger DE, Cohen Z, Kirsch R, O'Connor BI, Victor JC, Huang H, et al. Favorable pathologic and long-term outcomes from the conventional approach to abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 793-802.
19. Hiranyakas A, da Silva G, Wexner SD, Ho YH, Allende D, Berho M,. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 298-303.
20. Ortiz H, Wibe A, Ciga MA, Lujan J, Codina A, Biondo S; Spanish Rectal Cancer Project. Impact of a multidisciplinary team training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Spain. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 544-551.
21. Quirke P, Dixon MF,. The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988; 3: 127-131.
22. Keller DS, Paspulati R, Kjellmo A, Rokseth KM, Bankwitz B, Wibe A, et al. MRI-defined height of rectal tumours. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 127-132.
23. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Kennedy BJ, Murphy GP, et al. (eds). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (5th edn). Lippincott Raven: Philadelphia, 1997.
24. Manchon-Walsh P, Borras JM, Espinas JA, Aliste L,; Catalonian Rectal Cancer Group. Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for action. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37: 325-333.
25. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, et al. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 449-457.
26. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P,. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 303-312.
27. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 821-828.
28. Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G,. Oncological outcome after incidental perforation in radical rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 731-740.
29. Bülow S, Christensen IJ, Iversen LH, Harling H; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1256-1264.
30. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O,. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 48-58.
31. Mulsow J, Winter DC,. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: new direction or miles behind? Arch Surg 2010; 145: 811-813.