Current practice in abdominoperineal resection: An email survey of the membership of the Association of Coloproctology

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Dabbas, N ^a   Adams, K ^b   Chave, H ^c   Branagan, G ^c  

^a PORTSMOUTH HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c SALISBURY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical audit; Colon cancer; Colorectal surgery; Survey

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DISSECTION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; METHODOLOGY; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABDOMEN; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DISSECTION; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862592891     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588412X13171221589973     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S et al. A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 77-84.
2. Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD et al. Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 2008; 57: 1,690-1,697.
3. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 74-82.
4. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA et al. Low rectal cancer: a call for change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 9,257-9,264.
5. Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T et al. The extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 232-238.
6. Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908; 2: 1,812-1,813.
7. Low Rectal Cancer National Development Programme. http://www.lorec.nhs.uk/ (cited February 2012).
8. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ et al. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 588-599.
9. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C et al. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3,517-3,522.
10. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E et al. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 48-58.
11. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Putter H et al. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 83-90.
12. Bebenek M. Abdominosacral amputation of the rectum for low rectal cancers: ten years of experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 2,211-2,217.
13. Chavarriaga LF, Lin E, Losken A et al. Management of complex abdominal wall defects using acellular porcine dermal collagen. Am Surg 2010; 76: 96-100.
14. Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG et al. Pelvic floor reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix after cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 219-223.
15. Harth KC, Rosen MJ. Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov 2009; 16: 324-329.
16. Loganathan A, Ainslie WG, Wedgwood KR. Initial evaluation of Permacol bioprosthesis for the repair of complex incisional and parastomal hernias. Surgeon 2010; 8: 202-205.
17. National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. http://www. lapco.nhs.uk/ (cited February 2012).
18. VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 2007; 30: 303-321.
19. Fleming CM, Bowden M. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. J Environ Manage 2009; 90: 284-292.
20. Heiervang E, Goodman R. Advantages and limitations of web-based surveys: evidence from a child mental health survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011; 46: 69-76.
21. van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172: 1,292-1,298.
22. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 2000; 60; 821-836.