Evaluation of reach and grasp robot-assisted therapy suggests similar functional recovery patterns on proximal and distal arm segments in sub-acute Hemiplegia

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 593-602

  Loureiro, Rui C V ^a   Harwin, William S ^b   Lamperd, Robert ^c   Collin, Christine ^c  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL BERKSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Reach and grasp therapy; rehabilitation robotics; sensorimotor environment; sub acute stroke

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING;

COORDINATED MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; NEUROREHABILITATION; REACH AND GRASP; REHABILITATION ROBOTICS; ROBOT-ASSISTED THERAPIES; SENSORIMOTOR ENVIRONMENT; SUB-ACUTE STROKE;

ROBOTICS;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARM; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARM; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84900453449     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2265263     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. B. Bobath, Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment, 3rd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Heinemann, 1990.
2. J. H. Carr and R. B. Shepherd, A Motor Relearning Programme forStroke, 2nd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Heinemann, 1987.
3. M. S. ROOD, "Neurophysiological reactions as a basis for physicaltherapy, " Phys. Ther. Rev., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 444-449, Sep. 1954.
4. M. Knott and D. E. Voss, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation.New York: Harper Row, 1968.
5. S. Brunnstrom, Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia: A NeurophysiologicalApproach, 1st ed. New York: Harper Row, 1970.
6. E. Cotton and R. Kinsman, Conductive Education for Adult Hemiplegia.New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1983.
7. M. A. Banks, Stroke (International Perspectives in Physical Therapy, 2). New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1986.
8. A. Sunderland, D. J. Tinson, E. L. Bradley, D. Fletcher, R. LangtonHewer, and D. T. Wade, "Enhanced physical therapy improves recoveryof arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial, " J.Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 530-535, Jul. 1992.
9. G. Kwakkel, R. C.Wagenaar, T.W.Koelman, G. J. Lankhorst, and J. C.Koetsier, "Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A researchsynthesis, " Stroke, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1550-1556, Aug. 1997. (Pubitemid 27349680)
10. N. B. Lincoln, R. H. Parry, and C. D. Vass, "Randomized, controlledtrial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of armfunction after stroke, " Stroke, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 573-579, Mar. 1999. (Pubitemid 29115394)
11. E. Taub, G. Uswatte, and R. Pidikiti, "Constraint-induced movementtherapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physicalrehabilitation-A clinical review, " J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 237-251, Jul. 1999.
12. R. C. V. Loureiro, W. S.Harwin, K. Nagai, andM. Johnson, "Advancesin upper limb stroke rehabilitation: A technology push, " Med. Biol.Eng. Comput., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1103-1118, Jul. 2011.
13. S. C. Cramer and E. P. Bastings, "Mapping clinically relevant plasticityafter stroke, " Neuropharmacology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 842-851, Mar.2000. (Pubitemid 30103687)
14. B. B. Connor, A. M. Wing, G. W. Humphreys, R. M. Bracewell, andD. A. Harvey, "Errorless learning using haptic guidance: Research incognitive rehabilitation following stroke, " in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Disabil., Virt. Real. Assoc. Technol., 2002, pp. 77-84.
15. J. L. Patton, M. E. Stoykov, M. Kovic, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, "Evaluationof robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error inchronic hemiparetic stroke survivors, " Exp. Brain Res., vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 368-383, Jan. 2006. (Pubitemid 41830946)
16. B. E. Fisher and K. J. Sullivan, "Activity-dependent factors affectingpoststroke functional outcomes, " Top Stroke Rehabil., vol. 8, no. 3, pp.31-44, 2001. (Pubitemid 33095709)
17. R. J. Nudo, "Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: Implicationsfor stroke recovery, " Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am., vol.14, no. 1, pp. S57-S76, Feb. 2003. (Pubitemid 36259031)
18. A. C. Lo, P. D. Guarino, L. G. Richards, J. K. Haselkorn, G. F.Wittenberg, D. G. Federman, R. J. Ringer, T. H.Wagner, H. I. Krebs, B. T.Volpe, C. T. Bever, D. M. Bravata, P. W. Duncan, B. H. Corn, A. D.Maffucci, S. E. Nadeau, S. S. Conroy, J. M. Powell, G. D. Huang, andP. Peduzzi, "Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairmentafter stroke, " N. Eng. J. Med., vol. 362, no. 19, pp. 1772-1783, May 2010.
19. S. E. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, J. Stein, W. R. Frontera, R. Hughes, and N.Hogan, "Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke:Follow-up results, " Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 6-6, Jun. 2004.
20. P. S. Lum, C. G. Burgar, M. Van der Loos, P. C. Shor, M. Majmundar, and R. Yap, "MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitationin subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study, " J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 631-642, Jan. 2006. (Pubitemid 44759900)
21. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, M. A. Maier, E. Guigon, V. Chan, O. Akoner, E. T. Wolbrecht, S. C. Cramer, and J. E. Bobrow, "Do robotic andnon-robotic arm movement training drive motor recovery after strokeby a common neuralmechanism? Experimental evidence and a computationalmodel, " in Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf., 2009, vol.2009, pp. 2439-2441.
22. S. Masiero, A. Celia, G. Rosati, and M. Armani, "Robotic-assisted rehabilitationof the upper limb after acute stroke, " Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 142-149, Feb. 2007. (Pubitemid 46161321)
23. E. J. Koeneman, R. S. Schultz, S. L. Wolf, D. E. Herring, and J. B.Koeneman, "A pneumatic muscle hand therapy device, " in Proc.26th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2004, vol. 3, pp.2711-2713. (Pubitemid 40035599)
24. C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. H. Le, and S. C. Cramer, "Arobotic device for hand motor therapy after stroke, " in Proc. 9th Int.Conf. Rehabil. Robot., 2005, pp. 17-20. (Pubitemid 44017749)
25. A. S. Merians, "Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment:Does it improve functional recovery poststroke?, " Neurorehabil.Neural Repair, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 252-267, Jun. 2006.
26. F. Amirabdollahian, R. Loureiro, E. Gradwell, C. Collin, W. Harwin, and G. Johnson, "Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcomemeasures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediatedstroke therapy, " J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 16, 2007.
27. R. C. V. Loureiro, B. Lamperd, C. Collin, and W. S. Harwin, "Reach& grasp therapy: Effects of the Gentle/G System assessing sub-acutestroke whole-arm rehabilitation, " in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabil.Robot., 2009, pp. 755-760.
28. J. G. Colebatch and S. C. Gandevia, "The distribution of muscularweakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm, " Brain, vol.112, pp. 749-763, Jun. 1989. (Pubitemid 19151168)
29. P. W. Duncan, L. B. Goldstein, R. D. Horner, P. B. Landsman, G. P.Samsa, and D. B.Matchar, "Similar motor recovery of upper and lowerextremities after stroke, " Stroke, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1181-1188, Jun.1994. (Pubitemid 24164758)
30. A. M. Wing, A. Turton, and C. Fraser, "Grasp size and accuracy ofapproach in reaching, " J. Mot. Behav., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 245-260, Sep. 1986.
31. P. Haggard and A. Wing, "On the hand transport component of prehensilemovements, " J. Mot. Behav., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 282-287, Sep.1997.
32. W. S. Harwin, A. Murgia, and E. K. Stokes, "Assessing the effectivenessof robot facilitated neurorehabilitation for relearning motorskills following a stroke, " Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1093-1102, Oct. 2011.
33. J. J. Scholz, M. C.M. Klein, T. E. J. T. Behrens, and H. H. Johansen-Berg, "Training induces changes in white-matter architecture, " NatureNeurosci., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1370-1371, Nov. 2009.
34. R. Van der Linde, P. Lammertse, and E. Frederiksen, "The Haptic-Master, a new high-performance haptic interface, " in Proc. Eurohaptics, 2002.
35. R. C. V. Loureiro and W. S. Harwin, "Reach & grasp therapy: Designand control of a 9-DOF robotic neuro-rehabilitation system, " in Proc.IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot., 2007, pp. 757-763.
36. D.M.Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani, and M. I. Jordan, "Are arm trajectoriesplanned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study, "Exp. Brain Res., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 460-470, 1995.
37. E. Nakano, H. Imamizu, R. Osu, Y. Uno, H. Gomi, T. Yoshioka, andM. Kawato, "Quantitative examinations of internal representations forarm trajectory planning: Minimum commanded torque change model, "J. Neurophysiol., vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 2140-2155, May 1999. (Pubitemid 29262548)
38. N. Hogan, "An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements, "J. Neurosci., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2745-2754, Nov. 1984. (Pubitemid 15224418)
39. T. Flash and N. Hogan, "The coordination of arm movements: An experimentallyconfirmed mathematical model, " J. Neurosci., vol. 5, no.7, pp. 1688-1703, Jul. 1985. (Pubitemid 15234427)
40. F. Amirabdollahian, R. Loureiro, and W. Harwin, "Minimum jerktrajectory control for rehabilitation and haptic applications, " in Proc.IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., 2002, vol. 4, pp. 3380-3385. (Pubitemid 34916066)
41. R. Loureiro, F. Amirabdollahian, M. Topping, B. Driessen, and W.Harwin, "Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy-GENTLE/s approach, "Auton. Robots, vol. 15, no. 1, Jul. 2003.
42. T. Flash and E. Henis, "Arm trajectory modifications during reachingtowards visual targets, " J. Cognit. Neurosci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 220-230, Jul. 1991.
43. M. Jeannerod, "Intersegmental coordination during reaching at naturalvisual objects, " in Attent. Performance IX, 1981.
44. T. Iberall, "Grasp planning for human prehension, " in Proc. Int. JointConf. Artif. Intell., 1987.
45. B. Hoff and M. A. Arbib, "Models of trajectory formation and temporalinteraction of reach and grasp, " J. Motor Behauior, vol. 25, pp.175-192, 1993.
46. P. Haggard and A. Wing, "Coordinated responses following mechanicalperturbation of the arm during prehension, " Exp. Brain Res., vol.102, no. 3, 1995.
47. A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jääskö, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind, "The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation ofphysical performance, " Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 7, no. 1, pp.13-31, 1975.
48. D. T. Wade, Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000.
49. J. H. Carr, R. B. Shepherd, L. Nordholm, and D. Lynne, "Investigationof a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients, " Phys. Ther., vol.65, no. 2, pp. 175-180, Feb. 1985. (Pubitemid 15140059)
50. C. E. Lang, J. M. Wagner, D. F. Edwards, S. A. Sahrmann, and A.W. Dromerick, "Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesispoststroke, " Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, vol. 20, no. 4, pp.444-454, Dec. 2006. (Pubitemid 44690625)
51. J. Klein, S. J. Spencer, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Breaking it downis better: Haptic decomposition of complex movements aids in robotassistedmotor learning, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol.20, no. 3, pp. 268-275, May 2012.
52. A. J. Butler and S. J. Page, "Mental practice with motor imagery: Evidencefor motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke, "Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 2-11, Dec. 2006. (Pubitemid 44820031)