Introduction of a computer-based surgical platform in the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer: Outcomes and impact on approach

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 394-399

  Leitao Jr , Mario M ^a   Briscoe, Gabriel ^a   Santos, Kevin ^a   Winder, Abigail ^a   Jewell, Elizabeth L ^a   Hoskins, William J ^a   Chi, Dennis S ^a   Abu Rustum, Nadeem R ^a   Sonoda, Yukio ^a   Brown, Carol L ^a   Levine, Douglas A ^a   Barakat, Richard R ^a   Gardner, Ginger J ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer based surgery; Laparotomy; Robotic surgery; Uterine cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; HERNIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL PATIENT; UTERUS CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84859566311     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.046     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60: 277-300.
2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90.
3. Leitao Jr MM, Barakat RR. Advances in the management of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120:489-92.
4. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5331-6.
5. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL, et al. Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5337-42.
6. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomies - a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:167-75.
7. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, et al. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114: 1041-8.
8. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:360.e1-9.
9. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:36-41.
10. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:162-7.
11. Grobmeyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, et al. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:356-64. (Pubitemid 46283487)
12. Bijen CB, Vermeulen KM, Mourits MJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2010;121:76-82.
13. Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Cohen SL, et al. Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1142-9.
14. Perron-Burdick M, Yamamoto M, Zaritsky E. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1136-41.
15. Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A. Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:339-43.
16. Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR. Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS 2009;13:364-9.
17. Martino MA, Shubella J, Thomas MB, et al. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123(3):528-31.
18. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, et al. Surgical outcomes of roboticassisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol 2010;117:224-8.
19. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:1005-13.
20. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, et al. Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1207-13.
21. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, et al. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:231-5.
22. Robinson BL, Liao JB, Adams SF, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:369-71.