Digital facial dysmorphology for genetic screening: Hierarchical constrained local model using ICA

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 699-710

  Zhao, Qian ^a   Okada, Kazunori ^b   Rosenbaum, Kenneth ^a   Kehoe, Lindsay ^a   Zand, Dina J ^a   Sze, Raymond ^a   Summar, Marshall ^a   Linguraru, Marius George ^a,c  

^a CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided diagnosis; Down syndrome; Hierarchical constrained local model; Independent component analysis; Machine learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; FACE RECOGNITION; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATIENT MONITORING;

CONSTRAINED LOCAL MODELS; DOWN SYNDROME; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS(ICA); INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; LOCAL TEXTURE FEATURE; MORPHOLOGY AND STRUCTURES;

INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BECKWITH WIEDEMANN SYNDROME; CHILD; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; DIGITAL FACIAL DYSMORPHOLOGY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DOWN SYNDROME; FACIES; FEMALE; FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INFANT; KLINEFELTER SYNDROME; MACHINE LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBULOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS; NEWBORN; NOONAN SYNDROME; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUBINSTEIN SYNDROME; SOTOS SYNDROME; STICKLER SYNDROME; SYNDROME CHARGE; TRISOMY 18; WAARDENBURG SYNDROME; WILLIAMS BEUREN SYNDROME; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACE; GENETICS; PATHOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOWN SYNDROME; FACE; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84900446653     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alcantara D., Carmichael O., Harcourt-Smith W., Sterner K., Frost S., Dutton R., Thompson P., Delson E., Amenta N. Exploration of shape variation using localized components analysis 2009, 31:1510-1516.
2. Aldridge K., Boyadjiev S.A., Capone G.T., DeLeon V.B., Richtsmeier J.T. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dmd photogrammetric images. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2005, 138A:247-253.
3. Gonzalez Ballester, M., Linguraru, M.G., Reyes Aguirre, M., Ayache, N., 2005. On the adequacy of principal factor analysis for the study of shape variability. In: Proc. SPIE, pp. 1392-1399.
4. Benn P.A. Advances in prenatal screening for down syndrome: I. general principles and second trimester testing. Clin. Chim. Acta 2002, 323:1-16.
5. Bergstra J., Bengio Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012, 13:281-305.
6. Bishop C. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) 2007, Springer.
7. Boehringer S., Guenther M., Sinigerova S., Wurtz R.P., Horsthemke B., Wieczorek D. Automated syndrome detection in a set of clinical facial photographs. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2011, 155:2161-2169.
8. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learn. 2001, 45:5-32.
9. Burçin K., Vasif N.V. Down syndrome recognition using local binary patterns and statistical evaluation of the system. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:8690-8695.
10. Cai D., Zhang C., He X. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Unsupervised Feature Selection for Multi-cluster Data 2010, 333-342. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
11. Cardoso J. High-order contrasts for independent component analysis. Neural Comput. 1999, 11:157-192.
12. Chiu R.W.K., Akolekar R., Zheng Y.W.L., Leung T.Y., Sun H., Chan K.C.A., Lun F.M.F., Go A.T.J.I., Lau E.T., To W.W.K., Leung W.C., Tang R.Y.K., Au-Yeung S.K.C., Lam H., Kung Y.Y., Zhang X., van Vugt J.M.G., Minekawa R., Tang M.H.Y., Wang J., Oudejans C.B.M., Lau T.K., Nicolaides K.H., Lo Y.M.D. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma dna sequencing: large scale validity study. BMJ 2011, 342.
13. Cootes T.F., Taylor C.J., Cooper D.H., Graham J. Active shape models-their training and application. Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 1995, 61:38-59.
14. Cootes, T., Edwards, G., Taylor, C., 1998. Active appearance models. In: ECCV98, pp. 484-498.
15. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learn. 1995, 20:273-297.
16. Cristinacce D., Cootes T. Automatic feature localisation with constrained local models. Pattern Recogn. 2008, 41:3054-3067.
17. Dalal, N., Triggs, B., 2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: CVPR 2005, vol. 1, pp. 886-893.
18. de Graaf G., Haveman M., Hochstenbach R., Engelen J., Gerssen-Schoorl K., Poddighe P., Smeets D., van Hove G. Changes in yearly birth prevalence rates of children with down syndrome in the period 1986-2007 in the Netherlands. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2011, 55:462-473.
19. Denoeux T. A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on dempster-shafer theory. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 1995, 25:804-813.
20. Faghih Roohi S., Aghaeizadeh Zoroofi R. 4D statistical shape modeling of the left ventricle in cardiac mr images. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2012, 1-17.
21. χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of p. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 1922, 85:87-94.
22. Gerig, G., Styner, M., Szekely, G., 2002. Statistical shape models for segmentation and structural analysis. In: ISBI 2002, pp. 18-21.
23. Giessen, M., Raedt, S., Stilling, M., Hansen, T., Maas, M., Streekstra, G., Vliet, L., Vos, F., 2011. Localized component analysis for arthritis detection in the trapeziometacarpal joint. In: MICCAI 2011, vol. 6892, pp. 360-367.
24. Gower J.C. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975, 40:33-51.
25. Hammond, P., Hutton, Tim, J., Patton, Michael, A., Allanson, Judith, E., 2001. Delineation and visualisation of congenital abnormality using 3d facial images. In: IDAMAP at MedInfo 2001, pp. 26-29.
26. Hammond P., Hutton T.J., Allanson J.E., Campbell L.E., Hennekam R.C.M., Holden S., Patton M.A., Shaw A., Temple I.K., Trotter M., Murphy K.C., Winter R.M. 3D analysis of facial morphology. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2004, 126A:339-348.
27. Heimann T., Meinzer H.P. Statistical shape models for 3d medical image segmentation: a review. Med. Image Anal. 2009, 13:543-563.
28. Hollander M., Wolfe D.A. Non-parametric Statistical Methods 1999, Wiley-Interscience. second ed.
29. Horst, J.A., Beichel, I., 1997. A simple algorithm for efficient piecewise linear approximation of space curves. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 744-747.
30. Hotelling H. The Generalization of Student's Ratio. Springer Series in Statistics 1992, Springer, New York, Chapter 4, pp. 54-65.
31. Jadhav D.V., Holambe R.S. Feature extraction using radon and wavelet transforms with application to face recognition. Neurocomputing 2009, 72:1951-1959.
32. Loos H.S., Wieczorek D., Wurtz R.P., Malsburg C.v.d., Horsthemke B. Computer-based recognition of dysmorphic faces. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 11:555-560.
33. Lötjönen J., Kivistö S., Koikkalainen J., Smutek D., Lauerma K. Statistical shape model of atria, ventricles and epicardium from short- and long-axis mr images. Med. Image Anal. 2004, 8:371-386.
34. Lucey S., Wang Y., Cox M., Sridharan S., Cohn J.F. Efficient constrained local model fitting for non-rigid face alignment. Image Vis. Comput. 2009, 27:1804-1813.
35. Ma, W.Y., Manjunath, B.S., 1995. A comparison of wavelet transform features for texture image annotation. In: Proceedings.of International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 256-259.
36. Mika, S., Ratsch, G., Weston, J., Scholkopf, B., Mullers, K.R., 1999. Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop Neural Networks for Signal Processing IX, pp. 41-48.
37. Milborrow, S., Nicolls, F., 2008. Locating facial features with an extended active shape model. In: Computer Vision - ECCV 2008, pp. 504-513.
38. Ojala T., Pietikäinen M., Harwood D. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recogn. 1996, 29:51-59.
39. Ojala T., Pietikainen M., Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns 2002, 24:971-987.
40. Okada K., Steffens J., Maurer T., Hong H., Elagin E., Neven H., Malsburg C. The Bochum/USC Face Recognition System and How it Fared in the FERET Phase III Test. NATO ASI Series 1998, vol. 163. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Chapter 10, pp. 186-205.
41. Parker S.E., Mai C.T., Canfield M.A., Rickard R., Wang Y., Meyer R.E., Anderson P., Mason C.A., Collins J.S., Kirby R.S., Correa A. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res. Part A: Clin. Molec. Teratol. 2010, 88:1008-1016.
42. Reyes, M., Gonzalez Ballester, M.A., Li, Z., Kozic, N., See, C., Summers, R.M., Linguraru, M.G., 2009. Anatomical variability of organs via principal factor analysis from the construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009. ISBI '09, pp. 682-685.
43. Saragih, J.M., Lucey, S., Cohn, J.F., 2009. Face alignment through subspace constrained mean-shifts. In: 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1034-1041.
44. Saraydemir c., Taşpinar N., Eroǧul O., Kayserili H., Dinçkan N. Down syndrome diagnosis based on Gabor wavelet transform. J. Med. Syst. 2012, 36:3205-3213.
45. Seshadri, K., Savvides, M., 2009. Robust modified active shape model for automatic facial landmark annotation of frontal faces. In: IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, 2009. BTAS '09, pp. 1-8.
46. Sivakumar S., Larkins S. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in down syndrome. Arch. Disease Childhood 2004, 89. 691-691.
47. Skotko B.G. First- and second-trimester evaluation of risk for down syndrome. Obstetr. Gynecol. 2007, 110.
48. Skotko B.G., Davidson E.J., Weintraub G.S. Contributions of a specialty clinic for children and adolescents with down syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2013, 161:430-437.
49. Srinivasan, M., Ravichandran, N., 2013. A new technique for face recognition using 2D-gabor wavelet transform with 2D-hidden markov model approach. In: 2013 International Conference on Signal Processing Image Processing & Pattern Recognition (ICSIPR), pp. 151-156.
50. Suinesiaputra A., Frangi A., Kaandorp T., Lamb H., Bax J., Reiber J., Lelieveldt B. Automated detection of regional wall motion abnormalities based on a statistical model applied to multislice short-axis cardiac mr images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2009, 28:595-607.
51. Suinesiaputra A., Frangi A.F., Kaandorp T.A., Lamb H.J., Bax J.J., Reiber J.H., Lelieveldt B.P. Automated regional wall motion abnormality detection by combining rest and stress cardiac mri: correlation with contrast-enhanced mri. J. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 2011, 34:270-278.
52. Swarts K. Genetic Disorders 2009, Greenhaven Press.
53. Upton G., Cook I. Understanding Statistics 1996, Oxford University Press.
54. Uzümcü, M., Frangi, A., Sonka, M., Reiber, J., Lelieveldt, B., 2003a. ICA vs. PCA active appearance models: application to cardiac mr segmentation. In: Proc. MICCAI 2003, LNCS 2878.
55. Uzümcü, M., Frangi, R.F., Reiber, J.H.C., Lelieveldt, B.P.F., 2003b. Independent component analysis in statistical shape models. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 375-383.
56. Viola, P., Jones, M., 2001. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: CVPR 2001, vol. 1, pp. I-511-I-518.
57. Wilamowska, K., Shapiro, L., Heike, C., 2009. Classification of 3d face shape in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009. ISBI '09, pp. 534-537.
58. Wiseman F.K., Alford K.A., Tybulewicz V.L., Fisher E.M. Down syndrome recent progress and future prospects. Human Molec. Genet. 2009, 18:R75-R83.
59. Yang, W., Lucey, S., Cohn, J.F., 2008. Enforcing convexity for improved alignment with constrained local models. In: CVPR 2008, pp. 1-8.
60. Zhao, Q., Okada, K., Rosenbaum, K., Zand, D., Sze, R., Summar, M., Linguraru, M., 2013a. Hierarchical constrained local model using ica and its application to down syndrome detection. In: MICCAI 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8150, pp. 222-229.
61. Zhao, Q., Rosenbaum, K., Okada, K., Zand, D., Sze, R., Summar, M., Linguraru, M.G., 2013b. Automated down syndrome detection using facial photographs. In: 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
62. Zhao, Q., Rosenbaum, K., Sze, R., Zand, D., Summar, M., Linguraru, M.G., 2013c. Down syndrome detection from facial photographs using machine learning techniques. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 867003-867003.
63. Zhou, M., Liang, L., Sun, J., Wang, Y., 2010. Aam based face tracking with temporal matching and face segmentation. In: CVPR2010, pp. 701-708.